Set Theory Talks

Global set theory seminar and conference announcements

58th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium will be in the afternoon. Our speaker this week will be Haosui Duanmu from the Harbin Institute of Technology. This talk will take place this Friday, November 8th, from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: Nonstandard Decision Theory

Abstract: Nonstandard analysis, a powerful machinery derived from mathematical logic, has had many applications in probability theory as well as stochastic processes. Nonstandard analysis allows construction of a single object—a hyperfinite probability space—which satisfies all the first order logical properties of a finite probability space, but which can be simultaneously viewed as a measure-theoretical probability space via the Loeb construction. As a consequence, the hyperfinite/measure duality has proven to be particularly in porting discrete results into their continuous settings. 

The connection between frequentist and Bayesian optimality in statistical decision theory is a longstanding open problem. For statistical decision problems with a finite parameter space, it is well known that a decision procedure is extended admissible (frequentist optimal) if and only if it is Bayes. Such connection becomes fragile for decision problems with an infinite parameter space and one must relax the notion of Bayes optimality to regain such equivalence between extended admissibility and Bayes optimality. Various attempts have been made in the literature but they are subject to technical conditions which often rule our semi-parametric and nonparametric problems. By using nonstandard analysis, we develop a novel notion of nonstandard Bayes optimality (Bayes with infinitesimal excess risk). We show that, without any technical condition, a decision procedure is extended admissible if and only if it is nonstandard Bayes. We conclude by showing that several existing standard results in the literature can be derived from our main result.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is going to be an in-person/online hybrid event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title: The 58th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Haosui Duanmu Time: 16:00pm, Nov. 8, 2024(Beijing Time) Zoom Number: 436 658 8683 Passcode: 477893 Link: https://frontai-hk.zoom.us/j/4366588683?pwd=ob0TsLuLeIl0JT7403RaqvFKgOnuRf.1&omn=82954404806

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Best regards,
Wei

Logic Seminar 6 Nov 2024 17:00 hrs by Michael Takaaki Leong at NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 06.11.2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Michael Takaaki Leong Title: A weakening of a Suslin tree with variants of Martin's Axiom Abstract: A weakening of a Suslin tree, known as a Suslin lattice, was introduced by Dilworth, Odell, and Sari in 2007, and subsequently investigated by Raghavan and Yorioka in 2012. In this talk, we will show that the compatibility of a Suslin lattice with Martin's Axiom and its variants mirrors that of a Suslin tree by showing that a fragment of Martin's Axiom suffices to imply the non-existence of a Suslin lattice. We will also discuss the possible consistency of a Suslin lattice with the P-ideal Dichotomy. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Nov 4, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, November 4, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Elena Ficara (Paderborn)
Title: Logic and discrimination

Abstract: My talk is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood’s ideas in her groundbreaking article ‘The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic’ (1993). Although Plumwood’s paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination at the basis of my analysis, I present Plumwood’s ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how?




- - - - Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Date: Tuesday, November 5, 1pm (NY time), CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)
Piotr Gruza, University of Warsaw



- - - - Wednesday, Nov 6, 2024 - - - -

Philosophy Colloquium
Wednesday Nov 6, 4:15 P.M. to 6:15 P.M, CUNY Graduate Center Room 9206/9207
Alan Hájek
Professor of Philosophy, Australian National University
“A Chancy Theory of Counterfactuals”
 


The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York

Speaker:     David Jaz Myers, NYU Abu Dhabi.

Date and Time:     Wednesday November 6, 2024, SPECIAL TIME: 2:00 PM NYC TIME (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)

Title:     Contextads: Para and Kleisli constructions as wreath products.

Abstract: Given a comonad D on a category C, we can produce a double category whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps are Kleisli maps for D --- this is the Kleisli double category kl(D). Given a monoidal right action & : C x M --> C, we can produce a double category Para(&) whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps A -|-> B are pairs (P, f : A & P --> B) of a parameter space P in M and a parameterised map f.

In this talk, we'll see both these as special cases of a general construction: the Ctx construction which takes a *contextad* on a (double) category and produces a new double category. We'll see that this construction is "just" the wreath product of pseudo-monads in Span(Cat). We'll then exploit this observation to find 2-algebraic structure on the Ctx constructions of suitably structured contextads; vastly generalizing the old observation that a colax monoidal comonad has a monoidal Kleisli category.

This is joint work with Matteo Capucci.








- - - - Thursday, Nov 7, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Thursday November 7, 2pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 423
NOTE SPECIAL DAY/TIME/LOCATION
Assaf Shani, Concordia University
Generic dichotomies for Borel homomorphisms for the finite Friedman-Stanley jumps



- - - - Friday, Nov 8, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Geoff Galgon,
Distributivity and Base trees for 

For  a regular uncountable cardinal, we show that distributivity and base trees for  of intermediate height in the cardinal interval  exist in certain models. We also show that base trees of height  can exist as well as base trees of various heights  depending on the spectrum of cardinalities of towers in . These constructions answer questions of V. Fischer, M. Koelbing, and W. Wohofsky in certain models.





Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Artem Chernikov University of Maryland




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Nov 11, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday November 11, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Frank Wagner, Ohio State



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, November 11, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Friederike Moltmann (CNRS).
Title: On the ontology and semantics of absence

Abstract: This talk proposes a new semantic analysis of verbs of absence such as ‘lack’ and ‘be missing’. The semantics is based on the notion of a conceptual whole and its (conceptual) parts, which generates both variable embodiments (of the whole and its structural parts) and modal objects of the sort of a ‘lack’. It involves an extension of truthmaker semantics (applied to modal objects) where truthmakers (satisfiers) now include parts of wholes. The talk rehabilitates entities of the sort of ‘lacks’ often subject to ridicule, most notoriously by Chomsky.




- - - - Tuesday, Nov 12, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 1pm (NY time), CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)
Piotr Gruza, University of Warsaw




- - - - Wednesday, Nov 13, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Speaker:    Emilio Minichiello, CUNY CityTech.
Date and Time:     Wednesday November 13, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM.IN-PERSON TALK. CUNY Graduate Center Room 6417
Title:     Decision Problems on Graphs with Sheaves.

Abstract: This semester I don’t feel like talking about my research. Instead I’ll talk about what I’ve learned from reading the paper Compositional Algorithms on Compositional Data: Deciding Sheaves on Presheaves by Althaus, Bumpus, Fairbanks and Rosiak. This paper is about how we can use sheaf theory to break apart a computational problem, solve it on small pieces, and then glue the solutions together to get a global solution to the computational problem. I’ll go through the main ideas of this paper, using the category of simple graphs with monomorphisms as a main example to showcase their results.




- - - - Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Nov 15, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 15, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Philipp Schlicht Kurt Gödel Research Center



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 15, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Russell Miller, CUNY
Computable reductions on groups and fields

Hjorth and Thomas established that the complexity of the isomorphism problem for torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank grows dramatically higher as the rank increases: for each , there is no Borel function  that maps each rank- group  to a rank- group  in such a way that . We say that there is no Borel reduction from isomorphism on  to isomorphism on . (From lower to higher rank, in contrast, such a reduction is readily seen.) Fields of transcendence degree  over  have very similar computability properties to groups in . This being so, we extend their investigations to include the isomorphism relations on the classes  of such fields. We show that there do exist reductions (not merely Borel, but actually computable, and moreover functorial) from each  to the corresponding , and also from each  to  (which proves more challenging than it was for the groups!). It remains open whether a theorem analogous to that of Hjorth-Thomas holds for the fields, but we use the notion of countable reductions to show that the fundamental obstacle to a reduction from  to  is the uncountability of these spaces. This is joint work with Meng-Che 'Turbo' Ho and Julia Knight.





- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Set Theory in the United Kingdom, Cambridge, November 18, 2024

Conference
STUK 14 is the fourteenth installment of the series and will take place at Churchill College, Cambridge on Monday, 18 November 2024. The meeting will also be broadcast via zoom, please get in touch for joining info. Invited speakers include: Zachiri McKenzie (Chester) End extensions of models of subsystems of ZF Tristan van der Vlugt (Vienna) The horizontal direction & other differences between the classical and higher Cichoń diagram Allison Wang (Pittsburgh PA) Complexity of codes for Ramsey positive sets Talks will be in the Bevin Room: when entering the College through the main gate, go straight ahead along the Concourse to the end, turn left, and leave the building through a glass door, use the covered walkpath to the opposite building; the Bevin Room is one of the seminar rooms accessible from the foyer of the building.
Link to more info

Summer School on Topology, dynamics, and logic in interaction, in Cetraro, Italy, September 1-5, 2025

Conference
Registrations are open for a Summer School in Cetraro, Italy, September 1-5, 2025, on "Topology, dynamics, and logic in interaction" Some funding is available to support the attendance of early-career researchers The full list of minicourses and lecturers can be found at https://sites.google.com/unifi.it/cime/c-i-m-e-courses/c-i-m-e-courses-2025/topology-dynamics-and-logic-in-interaction
Link to more info

Set theory and topology seminar 05.11.2024 Paweł Krupski

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology on 2024-11-05 Tuesday 17:15 in MI, 605 the lecture:

An update on hyperspaces of knots.

will be presented by

Paweł Krupski

Abstract: New properties of the hyperspaces of simple closed curves in the plane or in the 3-space will be presented. In particular, the hyperspace of polygonal knots is a sigma-compact, strongly countable-dimensional ANR which is an infinite-dimensional Cantor manifold. The hyperspace of tame knots is an absolute Borel, strongly infinite-dimensional Cantor manifold. Joint work with Krzysztof Omiljanowski.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
PBN

About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.

***

Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Wednesday seminar and other events

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, There will be no seminar next week Wednesday November 6th due to the open house days in the Institute. However, there will be multiple events during the week of November 11.--15. Monday November 11, 16:30 -- Colloquium of the MLTCS department Wednesday November 13, 11:00 -- Seminar on reckoning Friday November 15, whole day -- Set theory workshop with University of Vienna Some more info: The colloquium/joint logic seminar of the MLTSC department will take place on Monday November 11th at 16:30, blue lecture hall, Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25. The seminar will start at 16:15 with coffee and cakes, after the talk we will go for drinks/dinner/.. Program: Pedro Marun -- TBA The seminar will take place as usual on Wednesday November 13th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Hannes Jakob (a student of Heike Mildenberger visiting Prague) -- TBA Radek Honzik (FF UK) and Vera Fisher will organize a small workshop. Forwarding information from Radek: Vera Fischer and myself will organize a small workshop which will take place on Friday 15.11.2024 at the Department of Logic of the Charles University, Celetna 20, Praha 1. We will have 5 people from Vienna (Vera, Corey, Monroe, Julia, Valentin). We would be happy if you could take part. Would you like to give a talk lasting either 30 or 50 mins (at your preference)? We have a room reserved which might not have a projector, so it would be better if you could do the traditional BB talk. Please let me know, we will prepare a schedule and Vera will also set up a website to make it official. If any of your students or colleagues at the Institute would like to attend as well, they are welcome, please let them know. Ask them to write an email to me to confirm so that I can send any updates to them directly. Best, David

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 28, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Date: Monday, October 28, 2pm (NY time), CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)

Sun Mengzhou, National University of Singapore
The Kaufmann–Clote question on end extensions of models of arithmetic and the weak regularity principle

We investigate the end extendibility of models of arithmetic with restricted elementarity. By utilizing the restricted ultrapower construction in the second-order context, for each  and any countable model of , we construct a proper -elementary end extension satisfying , which answers a question by Clote positively. We also give a characterization of countable models of  in terms of their end extendibility similar to the case of . Along the proof, we will introduce a new type of regularity principles in arithmetic called the weak regularity principle, which serves as a bridge between the model's end extendibility and the amount of induction or collection it satisfies.
The talk is based on this paper from arxiv:2409.03527.




Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 28, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Danielle Ullrich, Maryland



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 28, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Panelists: Hartry Field (NYU), Mel Fitting (CUNY), Noah Greenstein (Independent Scholar), Graham Priest (CUNY), and Achille Varzi (Columbia)
Topic: The present and future of logic and metaphysics

The Logic and Metaphysics Workshop will meet on October 28th from 4:15-6:15 in-person at the Graduate Center (Room 4419) to celebrate its 10th Anniversary. For this special occasion, there will be a panel discussing (inter alia) currents trends in, and the future of, Logic and Metaphysics.




- - - - Tuesday, Oct 29, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 30, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday October 30, 2024, 2:00PM NYC Time. NOTE SPECIAL TIME. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Speaker:     Bruno Gavranović, Symbolica AI.
Title:     Categorical Deep Learning: An Algebraic Theory of Architectures.Date and Time:     



- - - - Thursday, Oct 31, 2024 - - - -

6th Saul Kripke Lecture
The Saul Kripke Center 
Date: October 31st, 2024, from 4:00 to 6:30 pm, 
Room: CUNY Graduate Center Room C198
Kit Fine, Silver Professor and University Professor of Philosophy and Mathematics at NYU
Title: The Myth of the Ungiven

Abstract: The notion of a borderline case has been thought to be central to our understanding of vagueness. I shall argue that there is no intelligible notion that can play this role and that an alternative framework for understanding vagueness needs to be found.



- - - - Friday, Nov 1, 2024 - - - -

MAMLS (The Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Meeting)
Rutgers University
November 1 - 3, 2004

November 1, the first day of the three-day Rutgers MAMLS Fall Fest: Talks this afternoon are to be given by Justin Moore (3:00 pm) and Valentina Harizanov (4:30 pm) in Rutgers University’s Murray Hall in downtown New Brunswick, NJ. Those planning to attend should please register in advance here, where further information is available.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Nov 4, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, November 4, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Elena Ficara (Paderborn)
Title: Logic and discrimination

Abstract: My talk is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood’s ideas in her groundbreaking article ‘The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic’ (1993). Although Plumwood’s paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination at the basis of my analysis, I present Plumwood’s ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how?




- - - - Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Date: Tuesday, November 5, 1pm (NY time), CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)
Piotr Gruza, University of Warsaw



- - - - Wednesday, Nov 6, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York

Speaker:     David Jaz Myers, NYU Abu Dhabi.

Date and Time:     Wednesday November 6, 2024, ZOOM TALK. TIME TBA (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)

Title:     Contextads: Para and Kleisli constructions as wreath products.


Abstract: Given a comonad D on a category C, we can produce a double category whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps are Kleisli maps for D --- this is the Kleisli double category kl(D). Given a monoidal right action & : C x M --> C, we can produce a double category Para(&) whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps A -|-> B are pairs (P, f : A & P --> B) of a parameter space P in M and a parameterised map f.


In this talk, we'll see both these as special cases of a general construction: the Ctx construction which takes a *contextad* on a (double) category and produces a new double category. We'll see that this construction is "just" the wreath product of pseudo-monads in Span(Cat). We'll then exploit this observation to find 2-algebraic structure on the Ctx constructions of suitably structured contextads; vastly generalizing the old observation that a colax monoidal comonad has a monoidal Kleisli category.

This is joint work with Matteo Capucci.





- - - - Thursday, Nov 7, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Thursday November 7, 2pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 423
NOTE SPECIAL DAY/TIME/LOCATION
Assaf Shani, Concordia University
Generic dichotomies for Borel homomorphisms for the finite Friedman-Stanley jumps



- - - - Friday, Nov 8, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Geoff Galgon,
Distributivity and Base trees for 

For  a regular uncountable cardinal, we show that distributivity and base trees for  of intermediate height in the cardinal interval  exist in certain models. We also show that base trees of height  can exist as well as base trees of various heights  depending on the spectrum of cardinalities of towers in . These constructions answer questions of V. Fischer, M. Koelbing, and W. Wohofsky in certain models.





Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Artem Chernikov University of Maryland




- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Set theory and topology seminar 31.10.2024 Carlos López Callejas

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology on 2024-10-31 Thursday 17:15 in IM, 60? the lecture:

High dimensional sequential compactness

will be presented by

Carlos López Callejas

Abstract: In this talk, we will explore a multidimensional version of sequential compactness introduced by Kubis and Szeptycki, known as n-sequential compactness (n-sc), where n is a natural number. They demonstrated that this property holds in compact metric spaces and showed that it induces a hierarchy of sequential compactness; that is, for any n, if a space X is (n+1)-sc, then it is also n-sc. The question they pose is whether this hierarchy is strict—specifically, whether for each n, it is possible to construct a space that is n-sc but not (n+1)-sc. In this presentation, we will discuss some recent progress on this question and mention further generalizations of sequential compactness to any countable ordinal.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski

About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.

***

Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Set theory and topology seminar 29.10.2024 Francisco Santiago Nieto de la Rosa

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology on 2024-10-29 Tuesday 17:15 in MI, 60? the lecture:

A property of Laver forcing parameterized

will be presented by

Francisco Santiago Nieto de la Rosa

Abstract: Recently, Cieslak and Matinez-Celis have studied the Marczewski ideal associated with the Miller-Laver forcing \(m^0\) and \(l^0\). In particular, they considered parameterized versions of such forcings with ideals over omega (I) and considered the Marczewski ideal associated with these forcings \(m^0(I)\) and \(l^0(I)\). They are interested in studying the cofinality of such ideals. It is known that if the Laver forcing associated with I L(I) has the 1 to 1 or constant property, then \(l^0(I)\) has higher formality than the continuum. The mentioned mathematicians proved that for a certain class of ideals I, L(I) has the mentioned property, however they wonder what happens with ideals that do not belong to that class, specifically for Fin x Fin. In this talk we will give an affirmative answer to that question.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski

About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.

***

Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Set theory and topology seminar 29.10.2024 Ángel Jareb Navarro Castillo

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology on 2024-10-29 Tuesday 18:15 in MI, 60? the lecture:

Determinacy of Filter Games from the Closed-Set Covering Property

will be presented by

Ángel Jareb Navarro Castillo

Abstract: In this talk, we will prove the determinacy of some filter games (for example, \(G(F, \omega, F^∗)\) and \(G(F, [\omega]^{<\omega}, F^+)\)), assuming that the dual ideal satisfies the Closed-Set Covering Property. As corollaries, we obtain that these games are determined for every analytic filter (by a theorem of Solecki) and for every set in the Solovay model (by a theorem of Di Prisco and Todorcevic).

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski

About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.

***

Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

KGRC Set Theory talks October 28--October 31

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, TUESDAY, October 29, 3:00pm--4:30pm, hybrid mode "Very large cardinals and ordinal definability" P. Lücke (U Hamburg, DE) Motivated by the study of strong reflection principles, we introduce and study natural weakenings of the notion of a Reinhardt cardinal that turn out to be compatible with the Axiom of Choice. We then show that the existence of such large cardinals has far-reaching consequences for the class HOD of all hereditarily ordinal definable sets. This is joint work in progress with Juan P. Aguilera and Joan Bagaria. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, October 31, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Compacta and their homeomorphism groups from posets"" M. Malicki (U Warsaw, PL) Very recently Adam Bartoš, Tristan Bice and Alessandro Vignati discovered a duality, generalizing the Stone duality, between second countable $T_1$ compacta and $\omega$-posets. Their approach allows for elementary combinatorial constructions, in the spirit of Fraïssé theory, of classical continua such as the Lelek fan or the pseudo-arc. We extend this framework to study homeomorphism groups of compacta. We characterize Hausdorff compacta such that their group of homeomorphisms has a dense or a comeager conjugacy class. We use this characterization to prove that there exists a comeager conjugacy class in the group of homeomorphisms of the Lelek fan. This sheds light on the dynamics on the Lelek fan: a generic homeomorphism has no Lie-Yorke pair; in particular, its topological entropy is zero. We also show that there is a homeomorphism of the pseudo-arc with a dense conjugacy class. This is joint work with Tristan Bice. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Logic Colloquium Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090, 2nd floor, HS 11, Thursday, October 31, 3:00pm--3:50pm, hybrid mode "Continuous logic and equivalence relations" M. Malicki (Warsaw, PL) We will discuss two applications of infinitary continuous logic to complexity of equivalence relations. We will characterize in model-theoretic terms essentially countable isomorphism relations on Borel classes of locally compact Polish metric structures. This gives a new proof of Kechris' theorem that orbit equivalence relations of actions of Polish locally compact groups are essentially countable. We will also show that isomorphism on such classes is always Borel reducible to graph isomorphism. This immediately answers a question of Gao and Kechris whether isometry of locally compact Polish metric spaces is reducible to graph isomorphism. The first result is joint work with Andreas Hallbäck and Todor Tsankov. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to matthias.aschenbrenner@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: Oct 24: M. Casarosa, U Paris Cité, FR and U Bologna, IT: "Derived limits in the constructible universe" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/qm3bNssYfSEaMeG. -- ________________________________________________ Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0) 1 4277-50501

Wednesday seminar + colloquium of the MLTCS department

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday October 30th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Adam Morawski -- Diamonds and images of RN-compact spaces In 2013 A.Aviles and P.Koszmider solved a long-standing problem concerning continuous images of Radon-Nikodým compact spaces. Together with Arturo Martinez-Celis we took a closer look at one of their constructions and pushed it to its limits. Using parametrized diamond principles of Moore, Hrušák and Džamonja we construct an RN-compact space with an image which is not RN-compact while keeping the weight low. The colloquium/joint logic seminar of the MLTSC department will take place on Monday November 11th at 16:30, blue lecture hall, Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25. The seminar will start at 16:15 with coffee and cakes, after the talk we will go for drinks/dinner/.. Program: Pedro Marun -- TBA Best, David

Logic Seminar at NUS Wed 30 Oct 2024 by Desmond Lau

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 30 October 2024, 16:45 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Desmond Lau Title: Forcing with language fragments ... and without URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html Abstract: We develop a forcing framework based on the idea of amalgamating language fragments into a theory with a canonical term model. We then demonstrate the usefulness of this framework by applying it to variants of the extended Namba problem, as well as to the analysis of models of certain theories with constraints in interpretation (TCIs). Separately, we look at small extensions of V as generalised degrees of computability over V. Using TCIs, we formalise and investigate the complexity of certain methods one can use to define, in V, subclasses of degrees over V. Finally, we give a characterisation of the complexity of forcing. Note the early start of 16:45 hrs for the logic seminar talk.

KGRC Set Theory talk October 24

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talk: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, October 24, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Derived limits in the constructible universe" M. Casarosa (U Paris Cité, FR and U Bologna, IT) Set theory has proven useful in the study of derived limits. These functors are widely studied for their applications in algebraic topology, and their behavior is to some extent independent from ZFC. As already shown by Bergfalk and Lambie-Hanson in the case of ordinals, the derived limits associated with some set-theoretic objects tend not to vanish in $\mathbb{L}$. This corresponds to some form of incompactness. Here I present a similar result for ${}^\kappa \omega$ that uses diamonds and special Aronszajn trees. This is a work in progress with Jeffrey Bergfalk. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/p4pme5TA7KnmFpk "The classification problem for extensions of torsion-free abelian groups". * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 21, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 21, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Jason Block, CUNY
Elementarity of Subgroups and Complexity of Theories for Profinite Groups



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 21, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Thomas M. Ferguson (Rensselaer).
Title: Qua, per se, and other topic-transformative operators

Abstract: Recent work challenging principles of topic transparency in topic-sensitive logics has relied on providing accounts of connectives that are topic-transformative, that is, which non-trivially influence the overall topic assigned to a complex. This leads naturally to the question of what operators in natural language might also act as topic-transformative functions. This talk reviews work in progress studying “qua”, “per se”, and other topic-transformative operators. After discussing ways to analyze these operators, we will emphasize how such analyses are likely to assist in a parallel project of updating Richard Sylvan’s work on relevant containment logic.

Note: This is joint work with Pietro Vigiani (Pisa) and Jitka Kadlečková (Rensselaer).




- - - - Tuesday, Oct 22, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 23, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Oct 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Oct 25, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 25, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Stefan Geschke University of Hamburg

More Borel chromatic numbers

Borel chromatic numbers of definable graphs on Polish spaces have been studied for 25 years, starting with the seminal paper by Kechris, Solecky and Todorcevic. I will talk about some recent results about the consistent separation of uncountable Borel chromatic numbers of some particular graphs and about the Borel chromatic number of graphs related to Turing reducibility.




Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 25, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Computing away negation using ancients: from existential to Diophantine sentences

Last semester, I discussed geometric methods for decidability over a complete discrete valuation ring (DVR) in equal characteristic, suggesting that these methods could be applied effectively. In this talk, I aim to clarify the computability issues surrounding this topic while at the same time shifting focus to the case of mixed characteristic. Whereas quantifier elimination (QE) results are established for p-adic numbers, the general landscape remains less explored. I will demonstrate that for any existential sentence over a computable ring, we can effectively construct a positive existential (or Diophantine) sentence which is logically equivalent to the original in every excellent Henselian DVR containing the ring. This construction hinges on Resolution of Singularities, which is feasible in characteristic zero.

Furthermore, I will utilize ultraproducts, specifically the protoproduct variant, to show how Diophantine statements over a DVR can be reduced to those over a residue ring. Since the residue ring is Artinian—and in the case of p-adics, even finite—the associated problems become significantly more manageable. However, it is important to note that this approach does not yet yield a general QE result, as it applies only to sentences, not formulas. The challenge lies in the dependence of certain effective bounds on parameters. I will provide insights into how to derive a bound based on a refined notion of complexity within the equational system—beyond simply considering its degree—using ultraproducts. Additionally, I will address a request from the audience in my last talk by demonstrating that this bound is indeed effective.

And somehow it will also require some delving into the theory of Witt vectors and ancient elements, as I will explain.




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 28, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Date: Monday, October 28, 2pm (NY time), CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)

Sun Mengzhou, National University of Singapore
The Kaufmann–Clote question on end extensions of models of arithmetic and the weak regularity principle

We investigate the end extendibility of models of arithmetic with restricted elementarity. By utilizing the restricted ultrapower construction in the second-order context, for each  and any countable model of , we construct a proper -elementary end extension satisfying , which answers a question by Clote positively. We also give a characterization of countable models of  in terms of their end extendibility similar to the case of . Along the proof, we will introduce a new type of regularity principles in arithmetic called the weak regularity principle, which serves as a bridge between the model's end extendibility and the amount of induction or collection it satisfies.
The talk is based on this paper from arxiv:2409.03527.




Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 28, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Danielle Ullrich, Maryland



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 28, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Panelists: Hartry Field (NYU), Mel Fitting (CUNY), Noah Greenstein (Independent Scholar), Graham Priest (CUNY), and Achille Varzi (Columbia)
Topic: The present and future of logic and metaphysics

The Logic and Metaphysics Workshop will meet on October 28th from 4:15-6:15 in-person at the Graduate Center (Room 4419) to celebrate its 10th Anniversary. For this special occasion, there will be a panel discussing (inter alia) currents trends in, and the future of, Logic and Metaphysics.




- - - - Tuesday, Oct 29, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 30, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday October 30, 2024, 2:00PM NYC Time. NOTE SPECIAL TIME. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Speaker:     Bruno Gavranović, Symbolica AI.
Title:     Categorical Deep Learning: An Algebraic Theory of Architectures.Date and Time:     



- - - - Thursday, Oct 31, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Nov 1, 2024 - - - -

MAMLS (The Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Meeting)
Rutgers University
November 1 - 3, 2004

November 1, the first day of the three-day Rutgers MAMLS Fall Fest: Talks this afternoon are to be given by Justin Moore (3:00 pm) and Valentina Harizanov (4:30 pm) in Rutgers University’s Murray Hall in downtown New Brunswick, NJ. Those planning to attend should please register in advance here, where further information is available.





- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Set theory and topology seminar 22.10.2024 Dominik Bargieła

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
 I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 22.10.2024 at 17:15 in room 60?  (Mathematical Institute of Wrocław University) the lecture:
"Topological Stäckel Hypothesis"
will be presented by
Dominik Bargieła

Abstract: 
 In this talk I will try to introduce new notion of compactness called Stäckel compactness and compare it against other well-known kinds of compactness (with special emphasis on countable compactness). Moreover I will present and discuss the main problem whether  Stäckel compactness coincides with countable compactness.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

  

Logic Seminar at NUS on 23.10.2024 at 17:00 hrs by Ellen Hammatt

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Ellen Hammatt Title: Arriving on time: punctuality in structures, isomorphisms and 1-decidability In this talk we investigate what happens when we take concepts from computable structure theory and forbid the use of unbounded search. In other words, we discuss the primitive recursive content of structure theory. The central definition is that of punctual structures, introduced by Kalimullin, Melnikov and Ng in 2017. We investigate various concepts from computable structure theory in the primitive recursive case. A common theme is that new techniques are required in the primitive recursive case. In particular we will focus on topics such as finite punctual dimension, punctual 1-decidability and the punctual degrees. Where the punctual degrees is a degree structure within punctual presentations of a fixed structure which is induced by primitive recursive isomorphisms. I will present various results from my PhD thesis as well as pose some open questions in the area. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

57th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,

Welcome back to our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium! The first colloquium of this semester will be held in an irregular time which is going to be in the afternoon next Wednesday (it usually holds every Friday).

Our speaker this time will be Natasha Dobrinen from the University of Notre Dame. This talk is going to take place next Wednesday, October 23rd, from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: Forcing and Ramsey theorems on trees

Abstract: The Halpern Läuchli Theorem is a Ramsey theorem for colorings of products of finitely many trees. It was found as a key step in Halpern and Lévy's proof that BPI is strictly weaker than the Axiom of Choice, over Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Harrington gave a proof of the Halpern Läuchli Theorem using forcing as a means for unbounded search for a finite object, rather than via a generic extension and absoluteness. This talk will focus on extensions of this theorem and Harrington's method to a genre of tree Ramsey theorems. Such theorems are at the heart of infinite structural Ramsey theory such as big Ramsey degrees, infinite-dimensional Ramsey theory on Fraïssé structures, uncountable structures, and computability-theoretic bounds. 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is going to be an in-person/online hybrid event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Title: The 57th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Natasha Dobrinen
Time: 16:00pm, Oct. 23, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number: 436 658 8683
Passcode: 477893
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Best regards,
Wei




This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 14, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 13, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Slawomir Solecki, Cornell
From set theory to combinatorics of simplicial maps



CUNY GRADUATE CENTER CLOSED TODAY



- - - - Tuesday, Oct 15, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 16, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Oct 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Oct 18, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 18, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Hanul Jeon, Cornell University
On a cofinal Reinhardt embedding without Powerset

Reinhardt embedding is an elementary embedding from  to  itself, whose existence was refuted under the Axiom of Choice by Kunen's famous theorem. There were attempts to get a consistent version of a Reinhardt embedding, and dropping the Axiom of Powerset is one possibility. Richard Matthews showed that  proves  without Powerset is consistent with a Reinhardt embedding, but the embedding  in the Matthews' model does not satisfy the cofinality (i.e., for every set  there is  such that ). In this talk, I will show from  that  without Powerset is consistent with a cofinal Reinhardt embedding.




Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 18, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Brian Wynne, CUNY
Old and new decidability results for theories of Abelian lattice-ordered groups

An Abelian lattice-ordered group (l-group) is an Abelian group with a lattice order that is invariant under translations. Examples include , the set of continuous real-valued functions on a topological space  with pointwise operations and order, the  spaces, and certain spaces of measures. After surveying some of the known decidability results for various classes of l-groups, I will present new decidability results concerning existentially closed l-groups.




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 21, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 21, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Jason Block, CUNY
Elementarity of Subgroups and Complexity of Theories for Profinite Groups



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 21, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Thomas M. Ferguson (Rensselaer).
Title: Qua, per se, and other topic-transformative operators

Abstract: Recent work challenging principles of topic transparency in topic-sensitive logics has relied on providing accounts of connectives that are topic-transformative, that is, which non-trivially influence the overall topic assigned to a complex. This leads naturally to the question of what operators in natural language might also act as topic-transformative functions. This talk reviews work in progress studying “qua”, “per se”, and other topic-transformative operators. After discussing ways to analyze these operators, we will emphasize how such analyses are likely to assist in a parallel project of updating Richard Sylvan’s work on relevant containment logic.

Note: This is joint work with Pietro Vigiani (Pisa) and Jitka Kadlečková (Rensselaer).




- - - - Tuesday, Oct 22, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 23, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Oct 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Oct 25, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 25, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Stefan Geschke University of Hamburg



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 25, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Computing away negation using ancients: from existential to Diophantine sentences

Last semester, I discussed geometric methods for decidability over a complete discrete valuation ring (DVR) in equal characteristic, suggesting that these methods could be applied effectively. In this talk, I aim to clarify the computability issues surrounding this topic while at the same time shifting focus to the case of mixed characteristic. Whereas quantifier elimination (QE) results are established for p-adic numbers, the general landscape remains less explored. I will demonstrate that for any existential sentence over a computable ring, we can effectively construct a positive existential (or Diophantine) sentence which is logically equivalent to the original in every excellent Henselian DVR containing the ring. This construction hinges on Resolution of Singularities, which is feasible in characteristic zero.

Furthermore, I will utilize ultraproducts, specifically the protoproduct variant, to show how Diophantine statements over a DVR can be reduced to those over a residue ring. Since the residue ring is Artinian—and in the case of p-adics, even finite—the associated problems become significantly more manageable. However, it is important to note that this approach does not yet yield a general QE result, as it applies only to sentences, not formulas. The challenge lies in the dependence of certain effective bounds on parameters. I will provide insights into how to derive a bound based on a refined notion of complexity within the equational system—beyond simply considering its degree—using ultraproducts. Additionally, I will address a request from the audience in my last talk by demonstrating that this bound is indeed effective.

And somehow it will also require some delving into the theory of Witt vectors and ancient elements, as I will explain.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday October 16th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Francisco Santiago Nieto de la Rosa -- How to preserve multiple gaps Gaps appear through mathematics many times, in specific in set theory. They are useful, for example to prove that the boolean algebra p(\omega)/fin is not complete. Todorcevic and Aviles introduced a multidimensional generalization. In this talk we will present it, some classical results and conditions to preserve it with a forcing notion. Best, David

KGRC Set Theory talk October 17

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talk: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, October 17, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "The classification problem for extensions of torsion-free abelian groups " M. Casarosa (U Paris Cité, FR and U Bologna, IT) In this talk, I discuss the potential Borel complexity of the isomorphism relation for short exact sequences of countable torsion-free abelian groups. For this, we use both set-theoretic methods (in particular the theory of groups with a Polish cover and the notion of Solecki subgroups) and some categorical tools. One of the results is that for a certain class of groups $A$ we can find $C$ such that the classification problem corresponding to $\mathbf{Ext}(C,A)$ can have arbitrarily high potential Borel complexity. I will also present some results on the low-complexity cases and, time permitting, discuss the problem in the case of rigid groups. This is a work in progress with Martino Lupini. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- ________________________________________________ Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0) 1 4277-50501

Set theory and topology seminar 15.10.2024 Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 15.10.2024 at 17:15 in room 60?  (Mathematical Institute of Wrocław University) the lecture:
"On Banach spaces induced by graphs"
will be presented by

Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja


Abstract: 
I will present a way to define a pair of Banach spaces out of an infinite graph with some examples. I will show a combinatorial characterization of those graphs which induce pairs which are dual in a geometric sense.


Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Logic Seminar Wed 9 Oct 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 9 Oct 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Athipat Thamrongthanyalak Title: Tame expansions of real closed fields and Banach fixed point property URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html In this talk, we study a converse of the Banach fixed point theorem and its connection to tameness in expansions of a real closed field. Let R be a definably complete expansion of a real closed field. We say that R has the BFPP (short for, Banach fixed point property) when, for every locally closed definable set E, if every contraction on E has a fixed point, then E is closed. In this talk, we prove that if R has an o-minimal open core, then R has the BFPP; and if R has the BFPP, then R has a locally o-minimal open core.

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday October 9th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Chris Lambie-Hanson -- Higher-dimensional coherence We present some recent results about higher-dimensional analogues of coherent Aronszajn trees, focusing in particular on two-dimensional objects at aleph_2. Guided by an analogy with the theory of (one-dimensional) coherent Aronszajn trees at aleph_1, we will show that there are many situations in which two-dimensional coherent Aronszajn trees provably exist at aleph_2, but we will also show that these objects are typically quite fragile under forcing, indicating a limit to the extent of this analogy. This is joint work with Jeffrey Bergfalk and Jing Zhang. Best, David

This Week in Logic at CUNY (heads up, no email next week)

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Hi everyone,

I'll be traveling next weekend, so I won't be able to send out This Week in Logic on 10/6.  Regular mailings will resume the following week, Sunday 10/13.  

Apologies for any inconvenience,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:


- - - - Monday, Sep 30, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 30, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Su Gao, University of North Texas
Extremely amenable automorphism groups of countable structures



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 30, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Daniel West (CUNY)
Title: The disjunction property for operational relevance logics

Abstract: A logic has the disjunction property just in case whenever a disjunction is valid, at least one of its disjuncts is valid. The disjunction property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this talk I present joint work with Yale Weiss in which we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property also holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics. This is a known result in the case of the positive semilattice logic, but the proof is quite different, being proof-theoretic rather than semantic. These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.

Note: This is joint work with Yale Weiss (CUNY).



- - - - Tuesday, Oct 1, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 2, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER

- - - - Thursday, Oct 3, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER

- - - - Friday, Oct 4, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Oct 7, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 7, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
James Walsh, NYU



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 7, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time), GC 4419
Cian Dorr (NYU) and Matt Mandelkern (NYU)
Title: The logic of sequences

Abstract: In the course of proving a tenability result about the probabilities of conditionals, van Fraassen (1976) introduced a semantics for conditionals based on ω-sequences of worlds, which amounts to a particularly simple special case of ordering semantics for conditionals. On that semantics, ‘If p, then q’ is true at an ω-sequence just in case q is true at the first tail of the sequence where p is true (if such a tail exists). This approach has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, its logic has never been explored. We axiomatize the logic of ω-sequence semantics, showing that it is the result of adding two new axioms to Stalnaker’s logic C2: one, Flattening, which is prima facie attractive, and a second, Sequentiality, which is complex and difficult to assess. We also show that when sequence semantics is generalized to arbitrary (transfinite) ordinal sequences, the result is the logic that adds only Flattening to C2. We also explore the logics of a few other interesting restrictions of ordinal sequence semantics, and explore whether sequence semantics is motivated by probabilistic considerations, answering, pace van Fraassen, in the negative.



- - - - Tuesday, Oct 8, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 9, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday October 9, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky for zoom link)
Speaker:     Sam McCrosson, Montana State University.
Title:     Exodromy.

Abstract: A favorite result of first semester algebraic topology is the “monodromy theorem,” which states that for a suitable topological space X, there is a triple equivalence between the categories of covering spaces of X, sets with an action from the fundamental group of X, and locally constant sheaves on X. This result has recently been upgraded by MacPherson and others to a stratified setting, where the underlying space may be carved into a poset of subspaces. In this talk, we’ll look at the main ingredients of the so-called “exodromy theorem,” reviewing stratified spaces and developing “constructible sheaves” and the “exit-path category” along the way.




- - - - Thursday, Oct 10, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Oct 11, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

KGRC Set Theory talks September 30 - October 4

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following Set Theory talks: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Tuesday, October 1, 3pm--4:30pm, hybrid mode "Coding into the orbits of cofinitary permutations" L. Schembecker (U Hamburg, DE) In my talk I will give an introduction to (maximal) cofinitary groups (mcg's) and their corresponding cardinal characteristic $\mathfrak{a}_g$. I will present a notion of tightness for mcg's which implies the forcing indestructibility for various types of tree forcings, allowing us to prove that $\mathfrak{a}_g$ stays small in various models. Further, I will explain Zhang's forcing - the central forcing notion in context of mcg's - and show how one can adapt this forcing by some new coding techniques in order to construct co-analytic tight cofinitary groups. If time permits, we will see how these result may be combined with recent developments regarding projective well-orders and cardinal characteristics to obtain: Consistently, $\mathfrak{a}_g = \mathfrak{d} < \mathfrak{c} = \aleph_2$ alongside the existence of a $\Delta^1_3$-wellorder of the reals and a co-analytic witness for $\mathfrak{a}_g$. This is joint work with Vera Fischer and David Schrittesser. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, October 3, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Measures on omega" P. Borodulin-Nadzieja (U Wroclaw, PL) A (finitely additive) measure on omega is a natural generalization of an ultrafilter. In my talk I will discuss how to upgrade some classical notions studied for ultrafilters (such as P-points, Q-points, Rudin-Blass ordering) to the measure context. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Logic Colloquium Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090, 2nd floor, HS 11, Thursday, October 3, 3:00pm--3:50pm, hybrid mode "Definable hypergraphs on large spaces" P. Schlicht (U Wien) The open graph dichotomy states that the complete graph on the Cantor space is least among open graphs on analytic sets with respect to the ordering given by continuous graph homomorphisms. Ben Miller used dichotomies of this form to prove many interesting theorems in descriptive set theory. I will survey some results in this area focusing on generalised descriptive set theory, games and the Wadge hierarchy, and consider combinatorial counterparts to dichotomies such as the open graph axiom. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to matthias.aschenbrenner@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/. -- ________________________________________________ Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0) 1 4277-50501

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday October 2nd at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Pedro Marun -- MM for posets of size aleph_1 While the Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA) and its strengthening Martin’s Maximum (MM) have considerable large cardinal strength, the same is not true for posets of size aleph_1. If we write FA(aleph_1) for the restricted axiom, then Shelah showed that PFA(aleph_1) is relatively consistent with ZFC, while the consistency of MM(aleph_1) follows from an inaccessible. Mota asked whether Shelah’s inaccessible could be taken away. In joint work with Dobrinen, Krueger, Mota and Zapletal, we showed that the inaccessible is not necessary. The goal of this talk is to give (sketch?) the proof of this fact. We will also mention some open problems. Best, David

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday September 25th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: David Chodounsky -- Big Ramsey degrees of the pseudotree Yet again, I will talk about the big Ramsey degrees of the (binary) pseudotree, i.e. the countable universal homogeneous meet-tree, also the Fraisse limit of the class of finite meet trees (and its binary analogue). I plan to sketch again the proof that two element anti-chains do not have finite big Ramsey degree, and I will introduce some ideas for proving that finite chains do have finite big Ramsey degrees. This will be a 'work in progress' talk which make take unexpected turns and stops. Best, David

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 23, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 23, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Russell Miller, CUNY
Countable reductions in computable structure theory


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 23, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Rohit Parikh (CUNY)
Title: Value and freedom

Abstract: In order to decide how good a society is, we need some measure of goodness. And the goodness of a society is typically obtained by somehow summing up the well beings of its members. Various approaches include Utilitarianism and Rawlsianism as well as the Leximin approach suggested by Amartya Sen. But Sen and Nussbaum have suggested that the Capability of an individual, what the individual can do, should be the real measure of well being. Another issue is that of freedom. My freedom can be diminished by some restrictive laws. But it can also be diminished by some handicap, or by certain social methods not being available. How to measure the amount of freedom I have? Is it simply the number of options I have, or does the value of the options also matter? And what is the mathematics of freedom?

Note: An extended abstract is available here.





- - - - Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday September 25, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK,  Room 6417
Speaker:     Noah Chrein, University of Maryland

Title:     A formal category theory for oo-T-multicategories.


Abstract: We will explore a framework for oo-T-multicategories. To begin, we build a schema for multicategories out of the simplex schema and the monoid schema. The multicategory schema, D_m, inherits the structure of a monad from the +1 monad on the monoid schema. Simplicial T-multicategories are monad preserving functors out of the multicategory schema, [D_m, T], into another monad T. The framework is larger than just [D_m,T]. A larger structure describes notions of yoneda lemma and fibration. Inner fibrant, simplicial T-multicategories are oo-T-multicategories. oo-T-multicategories generalize oo-categories and oo-operads: oo-operads are fm-multicategories, oo-categories are Id-multicategories.

We use this framework to study oo-fc-multicategories, or "oo - virtual double categories". In general, under various assumptions on T (which hold for fc), the collection of oo-T-multicategories [D_m, T] has other useful structure. One such structure is a join operation. This join operation points towards a synthetic definition of op/cartesian cells, which we hope will model oo-virtual equipments. If there is time, I will explain the motivation for this study as it relates to ontologies, meta-theories and type theories.



- - - - Thursday, Sep 26, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 27, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Takashi Yamazoe, Kobe University
Cichoń's maximum with the uniformity and the covering of the -ideal  generated by closed null sets

Let  denote the -ideal generated by closed null sets on . We show that the uniformity and the covering of  can be added to Cichoń's maximum with distinct values, more specifically, it is consistent that  holds.




Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 27, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Victoria Gitman, CUNY
Baby measurable cardinals

Measurable cardinals and other large cardinals on the larger side of things are characterized by the existence of elementary embeddings  from the universe  of sets into a transitive submodel . The clear pattern the large cardinals in that region follow is that the closer the submodel  is to  the stronger the large cardinal notion. Smaller large cardinals, such as weakly compact or Ramsey cardinals, are known chiefly for their combinatorial properties, such as the existence of large homogeneous sets for colorings. But, it turns out that they too have elementary embeddings characterizations with embeddings on the correspondingly small models  of (a fragment) of set theory (usually , the theory  with powerset axiom removed). Elementary embeddings of  are often by-definable with the existence of certain ultrafilters or systems of ultrafilters. The classical example is that  is measurable if and only if there is a -complete ultrafilter on . The model  is then the transitive collapse of the ultrapower of  by . The connection between elementary embedding and ultrafilters also exists in the case of the small elementary embeddings. A typical elementary embedding characterization of a small large cardinal  follows the following template: for every , there is a (technical condition) model , with , for which there is an -ultrafilter  on  with (technical properties). A subset  is an -ultrafilter if the structure , with a predicate for , satisfies that  is a -complete ultrafilter on , meaning that  measures all the sets in  and its completeness applies to sequences that are elements of . The reason we need to add a predicate for  is that in most interesting case, and in contrast to the situation with measurable cardinals,  is not an element of  (indeed in most cases,  does not exist in ). While the structure  usually satisfies some large fragment of , once, we add a predicate for the -ultrafilter , the structure  can fail to satisfy even -separation. In this talk, I will discuss how smaller large cardinals follow the pattern that the more set theory the structure  satisfies the stronger the resulting large cardinal notion. I will use these observations to introduce a new hierarchy of large cardinals between Ramsey and measurable cardinals. This is joint work with Philipp Schlicht, based on earlier work by Bovykin and McKenzie.




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 30, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 30, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Su Gao, University of North Texas
Extremely amenable automorphism groups of countable structures



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 30, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Daniel West (CUNY)
Title: The disjunction property for operational relevance logics

Abstract: A logic has the disjunction property just in case whenever a disjunction is valid, at least one of its disjuncts is valid. The disjunction property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this talk I present joint work with Yale Weiss in which we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property also holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics. This is a known result in the case of the positive semilattice logic, but the proof is quite different, being proof-theoretic rather than semantic. These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.

Note: This is joint work with Yale Weiss (CUNY).



- - - - Tuesday, Oct 1, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Oct 2, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER

- - - - Thursday, Oct 3, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER

- - - - Friday, Oct 4, 2024 - - - -

NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER


- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 16, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 16, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Maxwell Levine, University of Freiburg
Namba Forcing, Minimality, and Approximations


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 16, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Mel Fitting (CUNY)
Title: Simple tableaus for simple logics

Abstract: Consider those many-valued logic models in which the truth values are a lattice that supplies interpretations for the logical connectives of conjunction and disjunction, and which has a De Morgan involution supplying an interpretation for negation. Assume the set of designated truth values is a prime filter in the lattice. Each of these structures determines a simple many-valued logic. We show there is a single Smullyan style signed tableau system appropriate for all of the logics these structures determine. Differences between the logics are confined entirely to tableau branch closure rules. Completeness, soundness, and interpolation can be proved in a uniform way for all cases. Since branch closure rules have a limited number of variations, in fact all the semantic structures determine just four different logics, all well-known ones. Asymmetric logics such as strict/tolerant, ST, also share all the same tableau rules, but differ in what constitutes an initial tableau. It is also possible to capture the notion of anti-validity using the same set of tableau rules. Thus a simple set of tableau rules serves as a unifying and classifying device for a natural and simple family of many-valued logics.



- - - - Tuesday, Sep 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 18, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday September 18, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK,  Room 6417
Speaker:     Jake Araujo-Simon, Cornell Tech.
Title:     Categorifying the Volterra series: towards a compositional theory of nonlinear signal processing.

Abstract:The Volterra series is a model of nonlinear behavior that extends the convolutional representation of linear and time-invariant systems to the nonlinear regime. Though well-known and applied in electrical, mechanical, biomedical, and audio engineering, its abstract and especially compositional properties have been less studied. In this talk, we present an approach to categorifying the Volterra series, in which a Volterra series is defined as a functor on a category of signals and linear maps, a morphism between Volterra series is a lens map and natural transformation, and together, Volterra series and their morphisms assemble into a category, which we call Volt. We study three monoidal structures on Volt, and outline connections of our work to the field of time-frequency analysis. We also include an audio demo.



- - - - Thursday, Sep 19, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 20, 2024 - - - -




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 23, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Russell Miller, CUNY
Countable reductions in computable structure theory


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 23, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Rohit Parikh (CUNY)
Title: Value and freedom

Abstract: In order to decide how good a society is, we need some measure of goodness. And the goodness of a society is typically obtained by somehow summing up the well beings of its members. Various approaches include Utilitarianism and Rawlsianism as well as the Leximin approach suggested by Amartya Sen. But Sen and Nussbaum have suggested that the Capability of an individual, what the individual can do, should be the real measure of well being. Another issue is that of freedom. My freedom can be diminished by some restrictive laws. But it can also be diminished by some handicap, or by certain social methods not being available. How to measure the amount of freedom I have? Is it simply the number of options I have, or does the value of the options also matter? And what is the mathematics of freedom?

Note: An extended abstract is available here.





- - - - Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday September 25, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK,  Room 6417
Speaker:     Noah Chrein, University of Maryland

Title:     A formal category theory for oo-T-multicategories.


Abstract: We will explore a framework for oo-T-multicategories. To begin, we build a schema for multicategories out of the simplex schema and the monoid schema. The multicategory schema, D_m, inherits the structure of a monad from the +1 monad on the monoid schema. Simplicial T-multicategories are monad preserving functors out of the multicategory schema, [D_m, T], into another monad T. The framework is larger than just [D_m,T]. A larger structure describes notions of yoneda lemma and fibration. Inner fibrant, simplicial T-multicategories are oo-T-multicategories. oo-T-multicategories generalize oo-categories and oo-operads: oo-operads are fm-multicategories, oo-categories are Id-multicategories.

We use this framework to study oo-fc-multicategories, or "oo - virtual double categories". In general, under various assumptions on T (which hold for fc), the collection of oo-T-multicategories [D_m, T] has other useful structure. One such structure is a join operation. This join operation points towards a synthetic definition of op/cartesian cells, which we hope will model oo-virtual equipments. If there is time, I will explain the motivation for this study as it relates to ontologies, meta-theories and type theories.



- - - - Thursday, Sep 26, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 27, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 27, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Victoria Gitman, CUNY
TBA


- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Logic Seminar 18 September 2024 16:45 hrs at NUS by Le Quy Thuong

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 18 September 2024, 16:45 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Le Quy Thuong Title: Motivic integration in valued fields and applications to singularity theory Abstract: Since 1995, motivic integration has been a powerful tool in algebraic geometry and other branches of mathematics. In particular, it has many important applications to singularity theory. For instance, Denef-Loeser around 2000 gave a breakthrough point of view in the study of singularities, by introducing the so-called motivic Milnor fiber, with the philosophy that this is a motivic incarnation of the classical Milnor fiber. One shows that many singularity invariants can be easily recovered from motivic zeta function and motivic Milnor fiber employing an appropriate Hodge realization. Furthermore, there are important problems concerning singularity theory such as monodromy conjecture, the integral identity conjecture, and the Thom-Sebastiani theorem that are waiting for new methods in motivic integration to have a solution. In this talk, we will describe some surprising interactions between motivic integration, model theory and singularity theory that lead to our proofs for the integral identity conjecture, and the motivic Thom-Sebastiani theorem, as well as other applications to singularities. The talk will avoid technical aspects and emphasize key ideas in motivic integration and singularity theory, which may be friendly to a general audience. Note that this week the seminar starts 15 minutes earlier than usual. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
 
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*.  In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories.  (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals.  The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
 


- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields

Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 16, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Maxwell Levine, University of Freiburg
Namba Forcing, Minimality, and Approximations


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 16, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Mel Fitting (CUNY)
Title: Simple tableaus for simple logics

Abstract: Consider those many-valued logic models in which the truth values are a lattice that supplies interpretations for the logical connectives of conjunction and disjunction, and which has a De Morgan involution supplying an interpretation for negation. Assume the set of designated truth values is a prime filter in the lattice. Each of these structures determines a simple many-valued logic. We show there is a single Smullyan style signed tableau system appropriate for all of the logics these structures determine. Differences between the logics are confined entirely to tableau branch closure rules. Completeness, soundness, and interpolation can be proved in a uniform way for all cases. Since branch closure rules have a limited number of variations, in fact all the semantic structures determine just four different logics, all well-known ones. Asymmetric logics such as strict/tolerant, ST, also share all the same tableau rules, but differ in what constitutes an initial tableau. It is also possible to capture the notion of anti-validity using the same set of tableau rules. Thus a simple set of tableau rules serves as a unifying and classifying device for a natural and simple family of many-valued logics.



- - - - Tuesday, Sep 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 18, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time:     Wednesday September 18, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK
Room 5417 (not the usual Room 6417)
Speaker:     Jake Araujo-Simon, Cornell Tech.
Title:     Categorifying the Volterra series: towards a compositional theory of nonlinear signal processing.



- - - - Thursday, Sep 19, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 20, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

UPDATE: This Week in Logic - today's Logic Workshop is in GC 4419

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Please note, the room for the Logic Workshop, including today's talk at  has been changed to 4419.

Best,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Thursday, Sep 05, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 06, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Reflecting Ordinals and Forcing

Let  and  either  or . An ordinal  is called -reflecting if for each  and each -formula  if  then there is a  so that  where here  refers to full second order logic. The least -reflecting ordinal is called  and the least -ordinal is called . These ordinals provably exist and are countable (for all ). They arise naturally in proof theory, particularly in calibrating consistency strength of strong arithmetics and weak set theories. Moreover, surprisingly, their relation to one another relies heavily on the background set theory. If  then for all  we have  (due to Cutland) while under PD for all  we have  if and only if  is even (due to Kechris).
Surprisingly nothing was known about these ordinals in any model which satisfies neither  nor PD. In this talk I will sketch some recent results which aim at rectifying this. In particular we will show that in any generic extension by any number of Cohen or Random reals, a Sacks, Miller or Laver real, or any lightface, weakly homogeneous Borel ccc forcing notion agrees with  about which ordinals are -reflecting (for any  and ). Meanwhile, in the generic extension by collapsing  many interesting things happen, not least amongst them that  and  are increased - yet still below  for . Along the way we will discuss the plethora of open problems in this area. This is joint work with Juan Aguilera.



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 6, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces

(One version of) Cantor's second best theorem states that every pair of countable, dense sets of reals are isomorphic as linear orders. From the perspective of set theory it's natural to ask whether some variant of this theorem can hold consistently when 'countable' is replaced by 'uncountable'. This was shown in the affirmative by Baumgartner in 1973 who showed the consistency of 'all -dense sets of reals are order isomorphic' where a set is -dense for a cardinal  if its intersection with any open interval has size . The above became known as Baumgartner's axiom, denoted BA, and is an important axiom in both combinatorial set theory and set theoretic topology. BA has natural higher dimensional analogues - i.e., statements with the same relation to  that BA has to . It is a long standing open conjecture of Steprāns and Watson that BA implies its higher dimensional analogues.

In the talk I will describe some attempts to break the ice on this open problem mostly by looking at a family of weaker and stronger variants of BA and investigating their combinatorial, analytic and topological consequences. We will show that while some weak variants of BA have all the same consequences as BA, even weaker ones do not. Meanwhile a strengthening of BA for Baire and Polish space gives much more information.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
 
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*.  In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories.  (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals.  The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
 


- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419

David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields

Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Logic Seminar 11 September 2024 17:00 hrs by Kihara Takayuki at NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 11 September 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Kihara Takayuki Title: Degrees of unsolvability of natural problems: A realizability-theoretic approach Abstract: The theories of degrees of unsolvability and realizability interpretation both have long histories, having both been born in the 1940s. S. C. Kleene was a key figure who led the development of both theories. Despite having been developed by the same person, there seems to have been little deep mixing of these theories until recently. In this talk, we will reconstruct the theory of degrees of unsolvability from the perspective of realizability theory. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday September 11th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Pedro Marun -- Labelled sets A theorem of Dilworth asserts that, if a poset P has no antichains of size m+1, where m is a natural number, then P can be written as a union of m many chains. If m is instead an infinite cardinal, then the analogous statement is false, counterexamples were constructed by Perles. In recent work, Abraham and Pouzet gave a basis for the class of such counterexamples, and asked if it could be somewhat simplified. Labelled sets arise in connection with these counterexamples. We show that, when the underlying sets are aleph_1-dense, then any two labelled sets embed into each other. Best, David

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This initial edition of This Week in Logic at CUNY is going out midweek, but in future our mailings will be on Sunday evenings as in the past.  Welcome back, everyone!

Best,
Jonas

This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Thursday, Sep 05, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 06, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.

Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Reflecting Ordinals and Forcing

Let  and  either  or . An ordinal  is called -reflecting if for each  and each -formula  if  then there is a  so that  where here  refers to full second order logic. The least -reflecting ordinal is called  and the least -ordinal is called . These ordinals provably exist and are countable (for all ). They arise naturally in proof theory, particularly in calibrating consistency strength of strong arithmetics and weak set theories. Moreover, surprisingly, their relation to one another relies heavily on the background set theory. If  then for all  we have  (due to Cutland) while under PD for all  we have  if and only if  is even (due to Kechris).
Surprisingly nothing was known about these ordinals in any model which satisfies neither  nor PD. In this talk I will sketch some recent results which aim at rectifying this. In particular we will show that in any generic extension by any number of Cohen or Random reals, a Sacks, Miller or Laver real, or any lightface, weakly homogeneous Borel ccc forcing notion agrees with  about which ordinals are -reflecting (for any  and ). Meanwhile, in the generic extension by collapsing  many interesting things happen, not least amongst them that  and  are increased - yet still below  for . Along the way we will discuss the plethora of open problems in this area. This is joint work with Juan Aguilera.



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 6, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 6417 (NOTICE THE CHANGE! BACK TO OUR PRE-2023 ROOM)

Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces

(One version of) Cantor's second best theorem states that every pair of countable, dense sets of reals are isomorphic as linear orders. From the perspective of set theory it's natural to ask whether some variant of this theorem can hold consistently when 'countable' is replaced by 'uncountable'. This was shown in the affirmative by Baumgartner in 1973 who showed the consistency of 'all -dense sets of reals are order isomorphic' where a set is -dense for a cardinal  if its intersection with any open interval has size . The above became known as Baumgartner's axiom, denoted BA, and is an important axiom in both combinatorial set theory and set theoretic topology. BA has natural higher dimensional analogues - i.e., statements with the same relation to  that BA has to . It is a long standing open conjecture of Steprāns and Watson that BA implies its higher dimensional analogues.

In the talk I will describe some attempts to break the ice on this open problem mostly by looking at a family of weaker and stronger variants of BA and investigating their combinatorial, analytic and topological consequences. We will show that while some weak variants of BA have all the same consequences as BA, even weaker ones do not. Meanwhile a strengthening of BA for Baire and Polish space gives much more information.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
 
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*.  In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories.  (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals.  The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
 


- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 6417 (NOTICE THE CHANGE! BACK TO OUR PRE-2023 ROOM)

David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields

Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -



- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Location change -- Wednesday seminar -- Macpherson

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, LOCATION CHANGE The seminar tomorrow will take place in the blue lecture hall, ground floor, rear building, Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25. Time is the same, we meet at 11:00. Best, David On 30/08/2024 14:36, David Chodounsky wrote: > Dear all, > > The seminar meets on Wednesday September 4th at 11:00 in the Institute > of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. > > > Program: Dugald Macpherson -- Definable set in finite structures, and > generalised measurable structures > > A result of Chatzidakis, van den Dries and Macintyre says that  if > \phi(x,y) is a formula in the language of rings (x,y tuples), then there > are finitely many pairs (\mu,d)  (\mu positive rational, d a natural > number) such that for any finite field F_q and parameter a,  the set > \phi(F_q,a) has size roughly \mu.q^d for one of the pairs (\mu,d). This > builds on the Lang-Weil estimates for the number of rational points in > an algebraic variety over a finite field. The result ensures that > pseudofinite fields have a notion of measure assigned to definable sets > and satisfying various axioms (such as a Fubini condition) and in > particular that pseudofinite fields have supersimple theory. > > I will describe various generalisations of this result, starting with > work  with Steinhorn, extended by Elwes, Ryten and others, and leading > to a further framework from a recent paper with Anscombe, Steinhorn and > Wolf. > > > > Best, > David

Wednesday seminar -- Macpherson

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday September 4th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Dugald Macpherson -- Definable set in finite structures, and generalised measurable structures A result of Chatzidakis, van den Dries and Macintyre says that if \phi(x,y) is a formula in the language of rings (x,y tuples), then there are finitely many pairs (\mu,d) (\mu positive rational, d a natural number) such that for any finite field F_q and parameter a, the set \phi(F_q,a) has size roughly \mu.q^d for one of the pairs (\mu,d). This builds on the Lang-Weil estimates for the number of rational points in an algebraic variety over a finite field. The result ensures that pseudofinite fields have a notion of measure assigned to definable sets and satisfying various axioms (such as a Fubini condition) and in particular that pseudofinite fields have supersimple theory. I will describe various generalisations of this result, starting with work with Steinhorn, extended by Elwes, Ryten and others, and leading to a further framework from a recent paper with Anscombe, Steinhorn and Wolf. Best, David

Logic Seminar 28 August 2024 17:00 hrs by Linus Richter, NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 28 August 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Linus Richter Title: Definable (Classical) Mathematics URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html Abstract: I will outline a few connections between various notions of definability (which vary in degree of logical formality), give examples, and describe some open questions at the intersection of logic and classical mathematics.

Logic Seminar at NUS on 21 Aug 2024 17:00 hrs by Vo Ngoc Thieu

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 21 August 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Vo Ngoc Thieu Title: Some Computational Aspects of Differential-Algebraic Equations Abstracts: Let DAE denote ``Differential-Algebraic Equation''. The main aim of this talk is to introduce our recent results on computational problems related to DAEs, including the effective differential Nullstellensatz, effective differential elimination, and finding general solutions of low-order algebraic ODEs. The effective differential Nullstellensatz involves finding a positive integer N for a given DAE system, such that one can check the consistency of the system by performing N differentiations and polynomial eliminations. Differential elimination involves removing independent variables from a DAE system. Differential Nullstellensatz and elimination are two fundamental problems in differential algebra and differential algebraic geometry. Since the number N represents the computational complexity of the effective differential Nullstellensatz and elimination, finding an upper bound for N is crucial. We will present our recent investigations into the problem of determining an upper bound for N. In addition, our results on the problem of determining algebraic/rational general solutions of first-order algebraic ODEs, as well as their connection with the Poincare problem, will also be presented. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

KGRC talk August 16

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talk: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Friday, August 16, 1:00pm--2:00pm, hybrid mode "Inaccessible cardinals and weak compactness in ZF" H. Duncan (U of Leeds, GB) Symmetric extensions are a generalisation of forcing used to extend models of ZF. We will give an introduction to the technique of symmetric extensions and use them to prove results in ZF. Specifically, we will show that $\omega_1$ can be inaccessible in ZF. We will finally examine weak compactness in ZF, as many weak compactness results which are equivalent in ZFC are not equivalent in ZF. These non equivalences can be shown explicitly at $\omega_1$. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/

Logic Seminar 7 August 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS by Zhang Jing

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Zhang Jing Title: Higher dimensional combinatorics URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html We expose an organizing framework to study higher dimensional infinitary combinatorics based on Cech cohomology, originating from works by Barry Mitchell, Barbara Osofsky and others. Key combinatorial notions include n-coherence and n-triviality for sequences of functions. We will use some recent vanishing and non-vanishing results to demonstrate "aleph_n is incompact for (n+1)-dimensional combinatorics" and "aleph_{omega+1} can be compact for n-dimensional combinatorics for all n". Time permitting, we will also discuss the possibility of generalizing classical 2-dimensional properties like being special or being Suslin to higher dimensions. The talk will be purely combinatorial. This is joint work with Jeffrey Bergfalk and Chris Lambie-Hanson.

Logic Seminar 31 July 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS by George Barmpalias, CAS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 31 July 2023, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-05 Speaker: George Barmpalias, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Title: Questions and progress in Algorithmic Randomness Abstract: I will discuss current challenges and progress in algorithmic randomness, focusing on Chaitin's halting probability, almost everywhere domination and measures of relative randomness. I will offer conjectures, partial results and benchmark problems toward solving the main questions. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

Kyoto University RIMS Set Theory Workshop, October 9-11, 2024

Conference
Kyoto University RIMS Set Theory Workshop 2024 Announcement / Call for Contributions Kyoto University RIMS Workshop: Recent Developments in Axiomatic Set Theory Hybrid workshop Date: Wednesday October 9th to Friday October 11th, 2024 Organizer: Masahiro Shioya (University of Tsukuba) Overview: RIMS Set Theory Workshop is held annually at the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Japan. It aims to bring together researchers in Set Theory from Japan and abroad and to foster research exchange. We encourage both young researchers and experts to contribute with talks. Any topics in Set Theory and relevant areas, as well as both in-person talks at RIMS and online talks via Zoom, are welcome. Invited Lectures: Monroe Eskew (University of Vienna): Dense ideals Gabriel Goldberg (UC Berkeley): The Ultrapower Axiom Registration through the website https://sites.google.com/view/rims-set-theory-2024/home Registration deadlines: Contributed talks: August 31st, 2024 Attendance in person: August 31st, 2024 Attendance via Zoom: October 7th, 2024
Link to more info

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday July 3rd at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, blue lecture hall, ground floor, rear building. NOTE THE UNUSUAL LOCATION! Program: Jindrich Zapletal -- A convenient axiomatization of the Solovay model I provide a simple forcing-free axiomatization of the choiceless Solovay model, which proves many of its features and features of its generic extensions. It is unlikely that there will be more Wednesday seminars during the rest of July. Seminars in August are uncertain. You might be interested in the Midsummer Combinatorial Workshop which will take place during July 29--August 2nd at Mala Strana, there will be a number of interesting visitors. Best, David

Set theory and topology seminar 25.06.2024 everybody

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar

I am happy to announce that the last seminar this semester in Set Theory and Topology (on Thuesday 25.06.2024 at 17:15) will take place in 

"Forma Płynna Beach Bar"

Plaża miejska, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego.


Every participant is the speaker.


Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday June 26th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Tristan Bice -- Constructing Compacta from Posets Trees are commonly used to construct topological spaces from their branches. However, the resulting spaces are usually quite special, e.g. having lots of clopen sets. Our goal is to construct more general (e.g. connected) spaces in a similar way from posets that are still quite 'tree-like'. This leads to a simple construction allowing us to build any second countable compact T_1 space (e.g. any metrisable compactum) from a countable graded poset with finite levels. In particular, this can be used to construct spaces like the pseudoarc and Lelek fan as Fraïssé limits in appropriate categories of graphs with relational morphisms. Continuous maps can also be encoded by certain relations between the posets with potential applications to finding dense and comeagre conjugacy classes of homeomorphisms, again in a simple Fraïssé theoretic way (joint work with Adam Bartoš, Maciej Malicki and Alessandro Vignati). Best, David

Set theory and topology seminar 18.06.2024 Aleksander Cieślak

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 18.06.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"The splitting ideal"
will be presented by

Aleksander Cieślak


Abstract: 
We will investigate the cardinal invariants and the Katetov position of certain ideal on \omega. As a result we will obtain a new upper boundary of the covering number of the density zero ideal.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday June 19th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Katerina Fukova -- Structure of semiartinian rings For (von Neumann) regular semiartinian rings with primitive factors artinian there is an invariant called dimension sequence (Theorem 2.1 in [1]) formed by slices of socle chain of the ring. The necessary conditions on this invariant were studied for example in [2]. We will focus on how much the dimension sequence determines the ring. I will discuss some specific case of commutative rings for which the ring corresponding to any suitable dimension sequence is (up to isomorphism) given by one construction from the ring of eventually constant sequences. Based on the joint work in progress with Jan Trlifaj. [1] P. Růžička, J. Trlifaj, J. Žemlička: Criteria of Steadiness. Marcel Dekker Abelian Groups, Module Theory, and Topology, 1998. [2] J. Žemlička: On socle chains of semiartinian rings with primitive factors artinian. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, Volume 37, 2016, Pages 316-322. Best, David

KGRC talk June 20

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talk: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, June 20, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Dense ideals (3/3) M. Eskew (U Wien) This is part of a three talk series. The first installment was on June 6 https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/f89ENYQLkdg4BNo, the second one on June 13 https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/HcbKs6J9LrdtKSD. In the third and final lecture of this series, we will finish outlining the proof of the consistency result that all $\aleph_n$ can simultaneously carry dense ideals.  This will involve a "uniformization" forcing that follows the Shioya collapse, several strategic closure arguments, and lifting an almost-huge embedding.  We will focus on the arguments for getting the result on $\aleph_1$ and $\aleph_2$, and briefly describe how to modify the uniformization forcing to go further. Zoom info: If you have not received the zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: June 11: L. Notaro (U Turin, IT), "Computable vs. Descriptive Combinatorics of Local Problems" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/s5D8KKtfrHASKeG June 13: M. Eskew (U Wien), "Dense ideals (2/3)" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/HcbKs6J9LrdtKSD Video recordings available so far of the Logic Colloquium: June 13: P. Speissegger (McMaster U, Hamilton, CA), "How can model theory help understand Hilbert's 16th problem?" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/7sdpoGbM3nWFe8o * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

56th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium will be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Lionel Nguyen Van The from Aix-Marseille University. This talk will take place this Friday,  June 14th,  from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: Ramsey theory in the context of Fraisse classes.

Abstract:
Structural Ramsey theory appeared naturally as a branch of Ramsey theory in the seventies, and is concerned with partition properties of combinatorial objects that are equipped with some structure (typically, in the sense of first order logic). While several seminal results were proved in those years, the subject was offered an unexpected revival thirty years later, whose consequences are still being felt today. This talk will be an attempt to describe the main lines of thought behind this story, starting from the pioneering work of Graham, Leeb, Nesetril, Rödl, Rothschild, Spencer and Voigt, continuing with that of Kechris, Pestov and Todorcevic, and finishing with that of Dobrinen. 

________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 56th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Lionel Nguyen Van The
Time :16:00pm, Jun. 14, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 436 658 8683
Passcode :477893
Link :https://frontai-hk.zoom.us/j/4366588683?pwd=ob0TsLuLeIl0JT7403RaqvFKgOnuRf.1&omn=86266820140
_____________________________________________________________________


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




Set theory and topology seminar 11.06.2024 Jadwiga Świerczyńska

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 11.06.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"On Q- and selective measures"
will be presented by

Jadwiga Świerczyńska


Abstract: 
We will present some generalizations of well-known definitions of types of ultrafilters to the realm of finitely additive measures on $\omega$. We will show a few results similar to the ones for ultrafilters: measure is selective if and only if it is a P-measure and a Q-measure, and that selective measures (Q-measures, respectively) are minimal in the Rudin-Keisler (Rudin-Blass) ordering. We will also show an example of a selective non-atomic measure. The second part will be focused on the integration: we will briefly describe Lebesgue integral with respect to finitely additive measures on $\omega$ and prove that it is a generalization of an ultralimit. Finally, we will present an idea of further generalizations of these definitions for functionals on $\ell^{\infty}$.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

KGRC talks June 11 -13

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: (updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Tuesday, June 11, 3:00pm--4:30pm, hybrid mode "Does $\mathsf{DC}$ imply $\mathsf{AC_\omega}$, uniformly?" L. Notaro (U Turin, IT) The axiom of dependent choice $\mathsf{DC}$ and the axiom of countable choice $\mathsf{AC_\omega}$ are two weak forms of the axiom of choice that can be stated for a specific set: $\mathsf{DC}(X)$ assets that any total binary relation on $X$ has an infinite chain; $\mathsf{AC_\omega}(X)$ assets that any countable family of nonempty subsets of $X$ has a choice function. It is well-known that $\mathsf{DC}$ implies $\mathsf{AC_\omega}$. We discuss and sketch the proof of the following theorem: it is consistent with $\mathsf{ZF}$ that there is a set $A\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $\mathsf{DC}(A)$ holds but $\mathsf{AC_\omega}(A)$ fails. This is joint work with Alessandro Andretta. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk tovera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, June 13, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Dense ideals (2/3) M. Eskew (U Wien) This is part of a three talk series. The first installment was on June 6 https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/event-details/news/dense-ideals-13/. In the second lecture, we will begin the consistency proof that all $\omega_n$ can carry dense ideals simultaneously.  We start with preliminaries on complete $\kappa$-closure, continuous projections, and inverse limits.  Then we introduce our main forcing, the Dual Shioya collapse, and establish its key properties. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: June 6: M. Eskew (U Wien) "Dense ideals (1/3)" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/f89ENYQLkdg4BNo -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

55th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium will be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Rizos Sklinos from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This talk will take place this Friday,  June 7th,  from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: First-order sentences in random groups 

Abstract: Gromov in his seminal paper introducing hyperbolic groups claimed that a “typical” finitely presented group is hyperbolic. His statement can be made rigorous in various natural ways. The model of randomness that is preferentially focused on is Gromov's density model, as it allows a fair amount of flexibility. In this model a random group is hyperbolic with overwhelming probability. In a different line of thought, Tarski asked whether all non-abelian free groups share the same first-order theory (in the language of groups). This question proved very hard to tackle and only after more than 50 years Sela and Kharlampovich-Myasnikov answered the question positively. Combining the two, J. Knight conjectured that a first-order sentence holds with overwhelming probability in a random group if and only if it is true in a no abelian free group. In joint work with O. Kharlampovich we answer the question positively for universal-existential sentences.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is going to be an online/offline hybrid event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.


Title :The 55th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Rizos Sklinos

Time :16:00pm, Jun. 7, 2024(Beijing Time)

Zoom Number : 436 658 8683

Passcode :477893

_____________________________________________________________________


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao





Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday June 12th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Bryant Rosado Silva -- Generically hereditarily equivalent Peano continua We say that a continuum $X$ is hereditarily equivalent if every nondegenerate subcontinuum of it is homeomorphic to X. This concept is one of the main motivations behind the construction of the pseudo-arc. If considered in the hyperspace of continua of X, denoted by Cont(X), it means that Cont(X) \ Fin(X) = { K in Cont(X) : \ K ~ X }. This is an open and dense set, hence comeager, thus we can say that the generic subcontinua of X is homeomorphic to X. Therefore, it is natural to ask if there exist other spaces that satisfy this property of having such collection of homeomorphic sets comeager in the hyperspace. We call these spaces generically hereditarily equivalent continua and show that the generalized Wazewski dendrites W_M for M subset { 3,4,..., infinity } are examples. Moreover, in the hyperspace of maximal order arcs of W_M, the chains having every nondegenerate element homeomorphic to W_M make a comeager subset of the maximal order arcs. Finally, we show that it is possible to find a comeager collection of chains with even more specific properties. This is a joint work with Benjamin Vejnar (Charles University). Best, David

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Lorenz Halbeisen)

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar
On Friday 07.06.2024 at 16.00 CEST
Lorenz Halbeisen (ETH Zürich)
will give a talk on 
The Graph Embedding Property and its relation to the Prime Ideal
Please refer to the usual webpage of our LogicGroup for more details and the abstract of the talk.

The seminar will be held remotely through Webex. Please write to vincenzo.dimonte [at] uniud [dot] it for the link to the event.

The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.

All the best,
Vincenzo

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, No seminar this Wednesday June 5th as many of the regular participants are not available. Best, David

Set theory and topology seminar 4.06.2024 Andres Uribe-Zapata (TU Wien)

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 4.06.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras: freeness and integration"
will be presented by

Andres Uribe-Zapata (TU Wien)


Abstract: 

In this talk, we present an integration theory with respect to finitely additive measures on a field of sets $\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal(X)$ for some non-empty set $X$. For this, we start by reviewing some fundamental properties of finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras. Later, we present a definition of the integral in this context and some basic properties of the integral and the integrability. We also study integration over subsets of $X$ to introduce the Jordan algebra and compare the integration on this new algebra with the integration on $\mathcal{B}$. Finally, we say that a finitely additive measure on $\mathcal{B}$ is \emph{free} if $\mathcal{B}$ contains any finite subset of $X$ and its measure is zero. We close the talk by providing some characterizations of free finitely additive measures.  

This is a joint work with Miguel A. Cardona and Diego A. Mejía.

References: 

[CMU] Miguel A. Cardona, Diego A. Mejía and Andrés F. Uribe-Zapata. Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras. In Preparation. 

[UZ23] Andrés Uribe-Zapata. Iterated forcing with finitely additive measures: applications of probability to forcing theory. Master’s thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, 2023. https://shorturl.at/sHY59.


Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

KGRC Talk - June 6

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talk: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, June 6, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode  "Dense ideals (1/3)" M. Eskew (U Wien) In this three-part lecture series, I will present my recent result with Yair Hayut that it is consistent for all successors of regular cardinals to carry dense ideals. We will start a bit out of order with applications, beginning with Woodin’s "transfer theorem" that shows that if we have diamonds and a normal ideal $J$ on $\kappa^+$ such that $\mathcal{P}(\kappa^+)/J$ is equivalent to $\mathrm{Col}(\kappa$, \kappa^+$), then there is a uniform $\kappa$-complete ideal $K$ on $\kappa^+$ such that $\mathcal{P}(\kappa^+)/K$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{P}(\kappa)/\mathrm{bounded}$. From this we can derive several combinatorial consequences that address some questions from graph theory and recent work on homological algebra on the ordinals. In the second and third lecture, we will outline the consistency proof. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * May, 23: V. Haberl (TU Wien); "Concentrated sets and γ-sets in the Miller model" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/7GA9fX7MfSHXYYR Video recordings available so far of the Logic Colloquium: May, 23: P. Szewczak (Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński U, Warsaw, PL); "Centenary of the Menger Conjecture" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/Zgt6x6sdTpHMq2o * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

54th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,


This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Andre Nies from the University of Auckland. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  May 31,  from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: Borel classes of closed subgroups of Sym(N) 

Abstract: Closed subgroups of the permutation group Sym(N) are interesting,  being the automorphism groups of models M with domain the natural numbers.   We study various conjugation-invariant Borel classes from a logician’s point of view. The locally Roelcke precompact groups form the largest class considered. Interesting subclasses include the totally disconnected locally compact (t.d.l.c.)  groups, and the oligomorphic group (when M is omega-categorical). 

We establish for each class a Borel duality with a class of countable structures that are based on Roelcke precompact open cosets.  This is used for an upper bound on the Borel complexity of topological isomorphism relations (with Schlicht and Tent), and for an algorithmic theory in the t.d.l.c. case (with Melnikov).

A lower bound on the complexity of topological isomorphism remains open for the oligomorphic groups. Paolini and Shelah obtained smoothness under the additional hypothesis that each open subgroup has the pointwise stabiliser of a finite set as a subgroup of finite index. Work in progress with Paolini establishes such an upper bound for several other subclasses, such as the case when the model M has no algebraicity.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 54th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Andre Nies

Time :16:00pm, May. 31, 2024(Beijing Time)

Zoom Number : 436 658 8683

Passcode :477893

Link :https://frontai-hk.zoom.us/j/4366588683?pwd=ob0TsLuLeIl0JT7403RaqvFKgOnuRf.1&omn=82728819387

_____________________________________________________________________


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Mirna Džamonja)

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar
On Friday 31.05.2024 at 16.00 CEST
Mirna Džamonja (CNRS-Université de Paris / IHPST)
will give a talk on 
Transfer principles in logic
Please refer to the usual webpage of our LogicGroup for more details and the abstract of the talk.

The seminar will be held remotely through Webex. Please write to vincenzo.dimonte [at] uniud [dot] it for the link to the event.

The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.

All the best,
Vincenzo

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday May 29th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Jonathan Cancino Manriquez -- Ultrafilters and large continuum The exact content of the talk has not yet been determined. However, for sure it will involve ultrafilters on the natural numbers, forcing and continuum bigger than omega_2. Best, David

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 20, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Emilio Minichiello , The CUNY Graduate Center.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 22, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN PERSON TALK!

Title:     Presenting Profunctors.


Abstract: In categorical database theory, profunctors are ubiquitous. For example, they are used to define schemas in the algebraic data model. However, they can also be used to query and migrate data. In this talk, we will discuss an interesting phenomenon that arises when trying to model profunctors in a computer. We will introduce two notions of profunctor presentations: the UnCurried and Curried presentations. They are modeled on thinking of profunctors as functors P: C^op x D -> Set and as functors P: C^op -> Set^D, respectively. Semantically of course, these are equivalent, but their syntactic properties are quite different. The UnCurried presentations are more intuitive and easier to work with, but they carry a fatal flaw: there does not exist a semantics-preserving composition operation of UnCurried presentations that also preserves finiteness. Therefore we introduce the Curried presentations and show that they remedy this flaw. In the process, we characterize which UnCurried Presentations can be made Curried, and discuss some applications. This talk will be based off of this recent preprint which is joint work with Gabriel Goren Roig and Joshua Meyers.


- - - - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 27, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 28, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 29, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 30, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 31, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

KGRC Talks - May 24

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, May 23, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode  "Concentrated sets and $\gamma$-sets in the Miller model" V. Haberl (TU Wien) Bartoszyński and Halbeisen conjectured that  in the Miller model there exists a concentrated set of reals of size $\mathfrak{c} = \omega_2$. Let us recall that a set $X\subseteq 2^\omega$ is concentrated if there exists a countable $Q\subseteq X$ such that $|X\setminus U|\leq \omega$ for every open set $U \subseteq 2^\omega$ with $Q\subseteq U$. In our talk we shall present the main ideas of the proof that this conjecture is false. Concentrated sets are canonical examples of Rothberger spaces of reals. We want to analyse the possible cardinalities of sets of reals satisfying selection principles in the Miller model. To avoid triviality we are interested in the totally imperfect cases, i.e. spaces that do not contain a copy of the Cantor space. Note that since $\mathfrak{d}$-concentrated sets are totally imperfect Menger spaces, there are such spaces of size continuum (since $\mathfrak{d} = \mathfrak{c}$). We shall sketch the proof that for the strongest selection principle, the $\gamma$-set  property, only cardinality atmost $\omega_1$ is possible. We hope that the tools of our results can be used as a prototype for the non-existence of Rothberger sets of reals with cardinality $\mathfrak{c}$. The goal would be to prove the same for Hurewicz totally imperfect sets of reals, the latter being a weaker property than Rothberger in the Miller model. The talk will be based on a recent joint work  with Piotr Szewczak and Lyubomyr Zdomskyy. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Logic Colloquium Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090, 2nd floor, HS 11, Thursday, May 23, 3:00pm--3:50pm, hybrid mode "Centenary of the Menger Conjecture" P. Szewczak (Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warsaw, PL) In 1924, Menger observed that any metric space $X$ which is \emph{$\sigma$-compact} (i.e., it is a countable union of its compact subsets) has such a property that for any basis $\mathcal{B}$ of $X$, there are sets $B_0,B_1,\ldots\in\mathcal{B}$, such that $\mathrm{lim}_{n\to\infty}\mathrm{diam}(B_n)=0$ and $X=\bigcup_{n\in \omega }B_n$. Menger conjectured that the above property  characterizes $\sigma$-compactness in the class of metric spaces. Soon thereafter Hurewicz reformulated the  Menger property without using a metric: for any sequence $\mathcal{U}_0,\mathcal{U}_1,\ldots$ of open covers of a given topological space, there are finite sets $\mathcal{F}_1\subseteq\mathcal{U}_0, \mathcal{F}_1\subseteq\mathcal{U}_1,\ldots$ such that the family $\bigcup_{n\in\omega}\mathcal{F}_n$ is an open cover of the space.In that way, the definition of the Menger property was extended on all topological spaces. By the results of Fremlin--Miller and Bartoszyński--Tsaban, there is in ZFC a subspace of the real line which is Menger but no $\sigma$-compact. The aim of the talk is to present an overview of the Menger property which is one of the most influential property in the topological selections theory and it has many connections to topology, set-theory and function spaces. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to matthias.aschenbrenner@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: May, 14:  O. Zindulka (Czech Technical U, Prague, CZ) "Combinatorics of Uniform Covers" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/2BBqLQZy7TownbM May, 16: C.B. Switzer (U Wien) "Baumgartner's Axiom and Cardinal Characteristics: A Sparse Look at Dense Sets of Reals III" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/BtQZfJS54fSnTJM Video recordings available so far of the Logic Colloquium: May, 16: R. Sklinos (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, CN) "First-order sentences in random groups" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/59BbzjWPdGiCB8x * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/. -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday May 22nd at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Next week there will also be an extra session of the Set Theory and Analysis seminar on Friday May 24th at 14:00, talk delivered by John Truss. (As well as an interesting talk on Tuesday morning.) See here: https://www.math.cas.cz/index.php/events/seminar/6 Program (Wednesday): Jindřich Zapletal -- Partition properties of omega one without choice I will show that certain natural partition properties of omega one which follow from the axiom of determinacy still hold in balanced extensions of the Solovay model, making them consistent with such objects as Vitali sets or ultrafilters. Best, David

53rd Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon, but at an irregular time, as we have two speakers this week.

Our speakers this week will be Yang Zheng and Ruiwen Li, both from Nankai University. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  May 17th,  from 2:30 pm to 5 pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). The first talk is starting at 2:30pm, and the second talk is starting at 4pm. Both talks are offline/online hybrid. 

Yang Zheng:
Title: On equivalence relations induced by Polish groups
Abstract: In this talk, we introduce Borel orbit equivalence relations, denoted by E(G), which can well-describe the structures and properties of a Polish group G from the perspective of Borel reduction.

Given a Polish group G, let E(G) be the right coset equivalence relation $G^\omega/c(G)$, where c(G) is the group of all convergent sequences in G. We shall present the following results: for a non-trivial Polish group G, we have that: (1) G is a countable group iff $E(G)\sim_B E_0$; (2) G is TSI non-archimedean uncountable iff $E(G)\sim_B E^\omega_0$; and (3) G is non-archimedean iff $E(G)\leq_B =^+$. In particular, $E(S_\infty)\sim_B =^+$ holds. Moreover, we will provide some Rigid Theorems and a Pre-rigid Theorem on TSI Polish groups, which can transform the existence problem of Borel reduction between E(G) equivalence relations, into the existence problem of well-behaved continuous homomorphisms between Polish groups. This is a joint work with Longyun Ding.


Ruiwen Li:
Title: Topological Type and Conjugacy Relation on Minimal Systems
Abstract: The complexity of conjugacy relation on minimal systems under Borel reducibility is a well-known question in descriptive set theory. In this talk, by analyzing the conjugacy relation on Oxtoby systems, I'll define an equivalence relation named topological type, this relation gives a lower bound of conjugacy complexity of minimal systems and shows that the conjugacy relation on minimal systems cannot be classified by countable structures. Moreover, when considering the  isomorphism relation of pointed minimal systems, the topological type relation describes its exact complexity.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is going to be an offline/online hybrid event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 53th Nankai Logic Colloquium 
Time :14:30pm, May. 17, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 371 037 9317
Passcode :477893
Link :https://zoom.us/j/3710379317?pwd=WEpLTjBtV1B2SHZaaFpnWU1qNzJVQT09&omn=92298090494

_____________________________________________________________________

The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893

Best wishes,

Ming Xiao





UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY

Hi everyone,


Note the addition of two talks in the NYC Category Theory Seminar, May 15 and May 22.

Best,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 13, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -

Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, May 14, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
SpeakerHans van Ditmarsch, CNRS, IRIT, University of Toulouse, France
Title: Epistemic logic and simplicial complexes


Abstract: All my working life as a logician epistemic logic came with Kripke models, in particular the kind for multiple agents with equivalence relations to interpret knowledge. Sure enough, I knew about enriched Kripke models, like subset spaces, or with topologies. But at some level of abstraction you get back your standard Kripke model. Imagine my surprise, around 2018, that there is an entirely dual sort of structure on which the epistemic logical language can be interpreted and that results in the same S5 logic: simplicial complexes. Instead of points that are worlds and links labeled with agents, we now have points that are agents and links labeled with worlds. Or, instead of edges (links), triangles, tetrahedrons, etcetera, that represent worlds. Simplicial complexes are well-known within combinatorial topology and have wide usage in distributed systems to model (a)synchronous computation. The link with epistemic modal logic is recent, spreading out from Mexico City and Paris to other parts of the world, like Vienna and Bern. Other logics are relevant too, for example KB4, in order to encode crashed processes/agents. Other epistemics are relevant too, and in particular distributed knowledge, which facilitates further generalizations from simplicial complexes to simplicial sets. It will be my pleasure to present my infatuation with this novel development connecting epistemic logic and distributed computing. Suggested introductory reading is:


https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08863
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_1
Knowledge and Simplicial Complexes
Hans van Ditmarsch, Eric Goubault, Jeremy Ledent, Sergio Rajsbaum

https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.7.34
Epistemic and Topological Reasoning in Distributed Systems (Dagstuhl Seminar 23272)
Armando Castañeda, Hans van Ditmarsch, Roman Kuznets, Yoram Moses, Ulrich Schmid
Section 4.3 Representing Epistemic Attitudes via Simplicial Complexes



- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Raymond Puzio.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 15, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON!

Title:     Uniqueness of Classical Retrodiction.


Abstract: In previous talks at this Category seminar and at the Topology, Geometry and Physics seminar, Arthur Parzygnat showed how Bayesian inversion and its generalization to quantum mechanics may be interpreted as a functor on a suitable category of states which satisfies certain axioms. Such a functor is called a retrodiction and Parzygnat and collaborators conjectured that retrodiction is unique. In this talk, I will present a proof of this conjecture for the special case of classical probability theory on finite state spaces.


In this special case, the category in question has non-degenerate probability distributions on finite sets as its objects and stochastic matrices as its morphisms. After preliminary definitions and lemmas, the proof proceeds in three main steps.

In the first step, we focus on certain groups of automorphisms of certain objects. As a consequence of the axioms, it follows that these groups are preserved under any retrodiction functor and that the restriction of the functor to such a group is a certain kind of group automorphism. Since this group is isomorphic to a Lie group, it is easy to prove that the restriction of a retrodiction to such a group must equal Bayesian inversion if we assume continuity. If we do not make that assumption, we need to work harder and derive continuity "from scratch" starting from the positivity condition in the definition of stochastic matrix.

In the second step, we broaden our attention to the full automorphism groups of objects of our category corresponding to uniform distributions. We show that these groups are generated by the union of the subgroup consisting of permutation matrices and the subgroup considered in the first step. From this fact, it follows that the restriction of a retrodiction to this larger group must equal Bayesian inversion.

In the third step, we finally consider all the objects and morphisms of our category. As a consequence of what we have shown in the first two steps and some preliminary lemmas, it follows that retrodiction is given by matrix conjugation. Furthermore, Bayesian inversion is the special case where the conjugating matrices are diagonal matrices. Because the hom sets of our category are convex polytopes and a retrodiction functor is a continuous bijection of such sets, a retodiction must map polytope faces to faces. By an algebraic argument, this fact implies that the conjugating matrices are diagonal, answering the conjecture in the affirmative.

Paper.




- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -

*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***


- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 20, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Emilio Minichiello , The CUNY Graduate Center.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 22, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN PERSON TALK!

Title:     Presenting Profunctors.


Abstract: In categorical database theory, profunctors are ubiquitous. For example, they are used to define schemas in the algebraic data model. However, they can also be used to query and migrate data. In this talk, we will discuss an interesting phenomenon that arises when trying to model profunctors in a computer. We will introduce two notions of profunctor presentations: the UnCurried and Curried presentations. They are modeled on thinking of profunctors as functors P: C^op x D -> Set and as functors P: C^op -> Set^D, respectively. Semantically of course, these are equivalent, but their syntactic properties are quite different. The UnCurried presentations are more intuitive and easier to work with, but they carry a fatal flaw: there does not exist a semantics-preserving composition operation of UnCurried presentations that also preserves finiteness. Therefore we introduce the Curried presentations and show that they remedy this flaw. In the process, we characterize which UnCurried Presentations can be made Curried, and discuss some applications. This talk will be based off of this recent preprint which is joint work with Gabriel Goren Roig and Joshua Meyers.


- - - - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.


This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Hi everyone,

This will be our last edition of "This Week in Logic at CUNY" for the Spring 2024  semester -- regular mailings will resume in late August.  Special updates may be sent for events that arise in the meantime.

Wishing you a happy and productive summer!
All the best,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 13, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -

Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, May 14, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
SpeakerHans van Ditmarsch, CNRS, IRIT, University of Toulouse, France
Title: Epistemic logic and simplicial complexes


Abstract: All my working life as a logician epistemic logic came with Kripke models, in particular the kind for multiple agents with equivalence relations to interpret knowledge. Sure enough, I knew about enriched Kripke models, like subset spaces, or with topologies. But at some level of abstraction you get back your standard Kripke model. Imagine my surprise, around 2018, that there is an entirely dual sort of structure on which the epistemic logical language can be interpreted and that results in the same S5 logic: simplicial complexes. Instead of points that are worlds and links labeled with agents, we now have points that are agents and links labeled with worlds. Or, instead of edges (links), triangles, tetrahedrons, etcetera, that represent worlds. Simplicial complexes are well-known within combinatorial topology and have wide usage in distributed systems to model (a)synchronous computation. The link with epistemic modal logic is recent, spreading out from Mexico City and Paris to other parts of the world, like Vienna and Bern. Other logics are relevant too, for example KB4, in order to encode crashed processes/agents. Other epistemics are relevant too, and in particular distributed knowledge, which facilitates further generalizations from simplicial complexes to simplicial sets. It will be my pleasure to present my infatuation with this novel development connecting epistemic logic and distributed computing. Suggested introductory reading is:


https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08863
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_1
Knowledge and Simplicial Complexes
Hans van Ditmarsch, Eric Goubault, Jeremy Ledent, Sergio Rajsbaum

https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.7.34
Epistemic and Topological Reasoning in Distributed Systems (Dagstuhl Seminar 23272)
Armando Castañeda, Hans van Ditmarsch, Roman Kuznets, Yoram Moses, Ulrich Schmid
Section 4.3 Representing Epistemic Attitudes via Simplicial Complexes



- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -

*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***


- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 20, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

120 Years of Choice, Leeds, 8–12 July 2024

Conference
120 Years of Choice, 8–12 July, 2024 This is a reminder for our conference 120 Years of Choice that will take place at the University of Leeds from 8th to 12th of July. For those that are still undecided, the scope of the conference is not limited to the Axiom of Choice and we will have a wide variety of speakers coming from different areas. The same of course also applies to poster submissions. Registration is still open until June 20th (20/06/2024), but we would like to ask all participants to register at their earliest convenience, so that we can plan accordingly. We have now extended the submission deadline for posters to May 31st (31/05/2024). Let us reiterate that we may be able to offer some financial support to those presenting a poster. We encourage any early career researchers to apply. For registration see more details at https://120ac.set-theory.info or email us at 120ac@leeds.ac.uk.
Link to more info

Set Theory in the United Kingdom, Oxford, 16 May 2024

Conference
STUK 13 ("Set Theory in the United Kingdom") will take place at the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford on Thursday, 16 May 2024. We have already secured István Juhász and Thilo Weinert as invited speakers who both plan to be there in person. https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~dbl25/STUK/ The schedule will be roughly as for the past meetings: we start in the late morning, have one talk before lunch, then lunch, then two more talks, and then ample time for "informal presentations" where everyone can and should speak to present themselves, their open questions, their research project, or their results.
Link to more info

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday May 15th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Jonathan Cancino Manriquez -- Basically generated ultrafilters This is a continuation of the last talk. We will recall and extend some facts that were already presented. Then we will prove some results on the existence of basically generated ultrafilters. Best, David

KGRC Set Theory Talks - May 12-17

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: SetTheory Seminar Kolingasse 14–16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, hybrid mode TUESDAY, May 14, 3:00pm–4:30pm ”Combinatorics of Uniform Covers” O. Zindulka (Czech Technological University, Prague, CZ) We look at diagonalization properties for sequences of various flavors of uniform covers of separable metric spaces and we describe them with game-theoretic and Ramsey-like partition properties. Applications include strong measure zero, null-additive and meager-additive sets in Polish groups, Menger-bounded spaces etc. Some highlights: a link to fractal measures and how it can help with calculation of cardinal invariants; Galvin-Mycielski-Solovay Theorem in various contexts;a solution to a Scheepers problem regarding products of strong measure zero spaces. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, May 16, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Baumgartner's Axiom and Cardinal Characteristics: A Sparse Look at Dense Sets of Reals III" C. B. Switzer (U Wien) Mini-course (25.04.2024-16.05.2024, 3 lectures) - 3rd lecture: Given a cardinal $\kappa$, a set of reals $A\subseteq \mathbb R$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with any open interval has size $\kappa$. Baumgartner's axiom (BA)---proved consistent by Baumgartner in 1973---states that all $\aleph_1$-dense sets of reals are order isomorphic with the induced linear order from $\mathbb R$. This is the most straightforward generalization to the uncountable of Cantor's proof that all countable dense linear orders without endpoints are order isomorphic. BA has variations to other topological spaces---given a topological space $X$, a subset $A \subseteq X$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with each non-empty open subset has size $\kappa$. The axiom BA($X$) states that given any two $\aleph_1$-dense subsets of $X$, say $A$ and $B$, there is an autohomeomorphism of $X$ mapping $A$ onto $B$. In this parlance BA is equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R$). Surprisingly BA is not equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R^n$) for any finite $1< n < \omega$. In fact BA does not follow from Martin's Axiom (Abraham-Rubin-Shelah) though BA($\mathbb R^n$) does (in fact from $\mathfrak{p} > \aleph_1$) for each $n > 1$ (Steprāns-Watson). In these three lectures I will discuss these ideas and some related ones including the question of when BA($X$) implies BA($Y$) for Polish spaces $X$ and $Y$. Central to these questions are the role of cardinal characteristics including the celebrated theorem of Todorčević that BA implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ as well as a recent, higher dimensional analogue of this result that for any $n < \omega$ BA($\mathbb R^n$) implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ (S.-Steprāns). There are many beautiful open problems in this area and I plan to make discussing them a focal point of the talks. The talks will start slowly and should be accessible to students. Time permitting, the final talk will include some new results. If and when these results are presented, they are joint work with Juris Steprāns. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available of the Set Theory Workshop ”Compactness and Cardinal Invariants, Vienna, May 3, 2024: C. Agostini (TU Wien), "On Nagata-Smirnov spaces and metrizability-like properties" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/DpQiNFzdqxpptfT S. Bardyla (U Wien), "Bohr compactification of discrete groups and Schur ultrafilters" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/3cpFpjNMZ6z5ejG J. Cancino (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, CZ), "Some results on Tukey types of ultrafilters on the natural numbers" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/8eiGqEsGCszYEG6 M. Iannella (TU Wien), "Descriptive consequences of rank-into-rank axioms" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/rSjEQYjTzbdE6os Ch. Lambie-Hanson (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, CZ), "Hajnal-Máté graphs and club guessing" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/pzpofnbPMyJZ9WY A. Medini (TU Wien), "A complete classification of the zero-dimensional homogeneous spaces under determinacy" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/QfZ8ccqaKk5anwH J.M. Millhouse (U Wien), "Projectively definable mad families of multiple sizes" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/kGPsfCgqJBQPKPk Š. Stejskalová (Charles U, Prague, CZ), "Forcing over a free Suslin tree" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/HTpXbwd9cd5zcRJ C.B. Switzer (U Wien), "Baumgartner’s axiom and its higher dimensional versions" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/224KHG2b9nJgp3w T. van der Vlugt (TU Wien), "The horizontal direction" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/nSGmaJNbzpoHAoN * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/) -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 6, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Lorenzo Rossi (Turin)
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth

Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.

Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).



- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman  (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)
Tuesday, May 7, 1pm

Ali Enayat, University of Gothenburg
Tarski's undefinability of truth theorem strikes again

Tarski's undefinability of truth theorem has two versions, the first one deals with truth itself, takes some effort to prove, and is a descendant of the Epimenides (liar) paradox. The second one deals with the related concept of satisfaction, has a one-line proof, and is a descendent of Russell's paradox. This talk is about the first one, which appeared in the 1953 monograph 'Undecidable Theories' by Tarski, Mostowski, and Robinson; it was employed there to show the essential undecidability of consistent theories that can represent all recursive functions (a strong form of the Gödel-Rosser incompleteness theorem). I will present Tarski's original 1953 formulation (which differs from the common formulation in modern expositions) and will explain how it was used in my recent work with Albert Visser to show that no consistent completion of a sequential theory whose signature is finite is axiomatizable by a collection of sentences of bounded quantifier-alternation-depth. A variant of this result was proved independently by Emil Jeřábek, as I will explain. Our proof method has a pedagogical dividend since it allows one to replace the cryptic Gödel-Carnap fixed point lemma with the perspicuous undefinability of truth theorem in the proof of the Gödel-Rosser incompleteness theorem.


Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, May 7, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Speaker: SREEHARI KALLOORMANA, Graduate Center CUNY
Title: Formal Argumentation Theory and Argumentation Logics.

Abstract: Deductive Logic is monotonic, in that when the set of premises grows, the set of conclusions grows as well. Since the 1980s, Non-monotonic Logics, where this does not hold, have been studied to model commonsense reasoning, especially in the field of artificial intelligence. In this talk, we will be looking at argument-based nonmonotonic logics, which formalize the notion of attack and defeat in the field of argumentation theory. We will consider briefly abstract argumentation frameworks and the various semantic notions proposed by P.M. Dung in 1995, followed by logic-based structured argumentation frameworks `a la John Pollock, and the more recent ASPIC framework. Various notions of argument attack/defeat fundamental to argumentation, such as rebuttal, undercutting, and undermining, will be discussed. We will then introduce and discuss the idea of reasoning about argumentation using Justification logic, by introducing priority orderings over formulas and justification terms.



- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.

Title:     Canonical squares in fully faithful and absolutely dense equipments.


Abstract: Equipments are categorical structures of dimension 2 having two separate types of 1-arrows -vertical and horizontal- and supporting restriction and extension of horizontal arrows along vertical ones. Equipments were defined by Wood in [W] as 2-functors satisfying certain conditions, but can also be understood as double categories satisfying a fibrancy condition as in [Sh]. In the zoo of 2-dimensional categorical structures, equipments nicely fit in between 2-categories and double categories, and are generally considered as the 2-dimensional categorical structures where synthetic category theory is done, and in some cases, where monoidal bicategories are more naturally defined.


In a previous talk in the seminar, I discussed the problem of lifting a 2-category into a double category along a given category of vertical arrows, and how this problem allows us to define a notion of length on double categories. The length of a double category is a number that roughly measures the amount of work one needs to do to reconstruct the double category from a bicategory along its set of vertical arrows.

In this talk I will review the length of double categories, and I will discuss two recent developments in the theory: In the paper [OM] a method for constructing different double categories from a given bicategory is presented. I will explain how this construction works. One of the main ingredients of the construction are so-called canonical squares. In the preprint [O] it is proven that in certain classes of equipments -fully faithful and absolutely dense- every square that can be canonical is indeed canonical. I will explain how from this, it can be concluded that fully faithful and absolutely dense equipments are of length 1, and so they can be 'easily' reconstructed from their horizontal bicategories.

References:
[O] Length of fully faithful framed bicategories. arXiv:2402.16296.
[OM] J. Orendain, R. Maldonado-Herrera, Internalizations of decorated bicategories via π-indexings. To appear in Applied Categorical Structures. arXiv:2310.18673.
[W] R. K. Wood, Abstract Proarrows I, Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle 23 3 (1982) 279-290.
[Sh] M. Shulman, Framed bicategories and monoidal fibrations. Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 20, No. 18, 2008, pp. 650–738.



- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -




- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -

Model Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495

Alf Dolich, CUNY
The decidability of the rings Z/mZ

In this expository talk I will discuss recent work of Derakhshan and Macintyre on the decidability of the common theory of the rings Z/mZ as m varies through the natural numbers m>1.





Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic

The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.

Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 13, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -

*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***


- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Logic Seminar 8 May 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 08 May 2024, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-04 Speaker: Vittorio Cipriano Title: Characterizing different notions of learnability of structures URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html In this talk, we combine computable structure theory and inductive inference to study learning of families of structures. All the structures we consider are relational and countable and all the families of structures we consider are at most countable. The framework we use was defined in a series of papers by Bazhenov, Fokina, Koetzing and San Mauro. In a nutshell, the framework models the scenario in which, given a family of structures K, a learner receives more and more information about the atomic diagram of a copy of some A in K and, at each stage, is required to output a conjecture about the isomorphism type of such a structure. In this context, a natural criterion to consider is Ex-learning in which we require the learner to stabilize to the correct conjecture after finitely many steps. Together with Bazhenov and San Mauro we gave a descriptive set-theoretic characterization of Ex-learning. Namely, we showed that a family of structures is Ex-learnable if and only if the corresponding isomorphism problem continuously reduces to E_0, the equivalence relation of eventual agreement on infinite binary sequences. Replacing E_0 with other equivalence relations, one obtains a hierarchy to rank such isomorphism problems. That is, a family of structures K is E-learnable, for an equivalence relation E, if there is a continuous reduction from the isomorphism problem associated with K to E. We aim to obtain model-theoretic characterization of E-learning for different equivalence relations E. Some characterizations are already present in the literature: here we show that a family of structures K such that for any A_i, A_j in K there is a Sigma_n^{inf} formula satisfied by A_i but not by A_j is E-learnable if and only if E is the (iteration of the) Friedman-Stanely jump of the identity either on natural numbers or on Cantor space. We also show that other learning criteria coming from the classical setting of inductive inference of formal languages or recursive functions have a nice model-theoretic characterization. This talk collects joint works with Bazhenov, Jain, Marcone, San Mauro and Stephan.

Fwd: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar


---------- Forwarded message ---------
Od: Grzegorz Plebanek <grzegorz.plebanek@math.uni.wroc.pl>
Date: wt., 30 kwi 2024 o 22:47
Subject: Fwd: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory
To: Szymon Żeberski <szymon.zeberski@pwr.edu.pl>
Cc: <sebastian.jachimek@math.uni.wroc.pl>, Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja <pborod@math.uni.wroc.pl>



Szymonie, rozeslij to, proszę do wszystkich z seminarium. To Jest wiadomość od Tomka Kanii (który prosi o informowanie wszystkich zainteresowanych) w sprawie sesji Przestrzenie Banacha, ale na liście konferencji jest też sesja Teoria Mnogości. Pozdrawiam, G

---------- Forwarded message ---------
Od: Tomasz Kania <tomasz2.kania@uj.edu.pl>
Date: wt., 30 kwi 2024 o 21:10
Subject: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory


okazuje się, że sesja z przestrzeni Banacha się odbędzie (nie jest jednak jeszcze jasne, którego dnia konferencji); jeżeli nadal wyrażasz zainteresowanie przyjazdem, bardzo proszę o przesłanie abstraktu na:

Abstrakty - 9. Forum Matematyków Polskich (us.edu.pl)

(oraz idealnie potwierdzenie emailowe do mnie, że udało Ci się posłać).

 

Set Theory Workshop "Compactness and Cardinal Invariants" Vienna, May 2, 2024

Conference
Set Theory Workshop at OMP and Kolingasse Together with our Czech research partners we invite you to this Workshop. Time and location: Morning session 9:00-12:00, Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, SR 6, 1st fl. Afternoon session 14:00-17:55, Kolingasse 14-16, SR 1, 1st fl. Zoom info: Please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Program: 09 : 00 − 9 : 30 Andrea Medini 09 : 35 − 10 : 05 Šárka Stejskalová 10 : 05 − 10 : 40 COFFEE 10 : 40 − 11 : 10 Corey Switzer 11 : 15 − 11 : 45 Serhii Bardyla 12 : 00 − 14 : 00 LUNCH 14 : 00 − 14 : 30 Chris Lambie-Hanson 14 : 35 − 15 : 05 Jonathan Cancino 15 : 05 − 15 : 40 COFFEE 15 : 40 − 16 : 10 Julia Millhouse 16 : 15 − 16 : 45 Tristan van der Vlugt 16 : 50 − 17 : 20 Martina Iannella 17 : 25 − 17 : 55 Claudio Agostini Organizer: Vera Fischer (U Wien) Radek Honzik (Charles University, Prague, CZ) If you have any questions, please write to the organizers. For more information see the program.
Link to more info

UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Hi everyone,

Note the addition of a talk by Benjamin Prudhomme in the Computational Logic Seminar on Tuesday 4/30.

All best,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Monday, Apr 29, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 29, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Gabe Goldberg, Berkeley
Generalizations of the Ultrapower Axiom



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Anandi Hattiangadi (Stockholm).
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap

Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.



- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -


Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, April 30  
Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Speaker: Benjamin PrudHomme, Graduate Center CUNY
Title: On Game Theory and Epistemic Logic

Abstract: Review of basic game theory and epistemic game theory concepts, including strictly competitive games, pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria, rationalizability, models of knowledge, distinction between mutual and common knowledge. Review of proofs of when a game has a Nash equilibrium, Nash's Theorem, Muddy Children Problem. Discussions of current and potential future efforts to utilize logic in developing a more comprehensive theory of pure strategy solutions.




- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -

Model Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495
Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Genericity in models of arithmetic

In this talk, I plan to explore a few notions of 'genericity' in the context of models of arithmetic. I will recall the notion of genericity borrowed from set-theory, used by Simpson to prove that every countable model of PA has an expansion to a pointwise definable model of PA*. I will then explore other notions of genericity inspired by more model-theoretic contexts. One such notion is 'neutrality': in a model M, we say an undefinable set X is neutral if the definable closure relation in (M, X) is the same as in M. Another notion, inspired by work done on model-theoretic genericity by Chatzidakis and Pillay, is called CP-genericity. I will explore these notions and outline some results, including: (1) every model of PA has a neutral set which is not CP-generic, (2) every countable model of PA has a CP-generic which is not neutral (and in fact, fails neutrality spectacularly: ie, we can find a CP-generic where the expansion is pointwise definable), and (3) every countable model of PA has a neutral CP-generic. This talk touches on work contained in two papers, one of which was joint work with Roman Kossak, and the other was joint work with James Schmerl.



Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.

Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing

We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type

In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy  and topological pressure  on compact shift spaces  and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function  is not computable for a large set of shift spaces  and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 6, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Lorenzo Rossi (Turin)
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth

Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.

Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).



- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.

Title:     Canonical squares in regularly framed bicategories.




- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -




- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic

The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.

Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.





- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Spencer Unger)

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar
On Friday 03.05.2024 at 16.00 CEST
Spencer Unger (University of Toronto)
will give a talk on
Iterated ultrapower methods
Please refer to the usual webpage of our LogicGroup for more details and the abstract of the talk.

The seminar will be held remotely through Webex. Please write to vincenzo.dimonte [at] uniud [dot] it for the link to the event.

The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.

All the best,
Vincenzo

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Monday, Apr 29, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 29, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Gabe Goldberg, Berkeley
Generalizations of the Ultrapower Axiom



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Anandi Hattiangadi (Stockholm).
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap

Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.



- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -

Model Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495
Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Genericity in models of arithmetic

In this talk, I plan to explore a few notions of 'genericity' in the context of models of arithmetic. I will recall the notion of genericity borrowed from set-theory, used by Simpson to prove that every countable model of PA has an expansion to a pointwise definable model of PA*. I will then explore other notions of genericity inspired by more model-theoretic contexts. One such notion is 'neutrality': in a model M, we say an undefinable set X is neutral if the definable closure relation in (M, X) is the same as in M. Another notion, inspired by work done on model-theoretic genericity by Chatzidakis and Pillay, is called CP-genericity. I will explore these notions and outline some results, including: (1) every model of PA has a neutral set which is not CP-generic, (2) every countable model of PA has a CP-generic which is not neutral (and in fact, fails neutrality spectacularly: ie, we can find a CP-generic where the expansion is pointwise definable), and (3) every countable model of PA has a neutral CP-generic. This talk touches on work contained in two papers, one of which was joint work with Roman Kossak, and the other was joint work with James Schmerl.



Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.

Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing

We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type

In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy  and topological pressure  on compact shift spaces  and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function  is not computable for a large set of shift spaces  and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, May 6, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Lorenzo Rossi (Turin)
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth

Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.

Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).



- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.

Date and Time:     Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.

Title:     Canonical squares in regularly framed bicategories.




- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -




- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic

The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.

Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.





- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

KGRC Set Theory Talk - May 2

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following Set Theory Seminar talk: "Baumgartner's Axiom and Cardinal Characteristics: A Sparse Look at Dense Sets of Reals II" C. B. Switzer (U Wien) Kolingasse 14–16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, May 2, 11:30am–1:00pm, hybrid mode Mini-course (25.04.2024-16.05.2024, 3 lectures) - 2nd lecture: Given a cardinal $\kappa$, a set of reals $A\subseteq \mathbb R$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with any open interval has size $\kappa$. Baumgartner's axiom (BA)---proved consistent by Baumgartner in 1973---states that all $\aleph_1$-dense sets of reals are order isomorphic with the induced linear order from $\mathbb R$. This is the most straightforward generalization to the uncountable of Cantor's proof that all countable dense linear orders without endpoints are order isomorphic. BA has variations to other topological spaces---given a topological space $X$, a subset $A \subseteq X$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with each non-empty open subset has size $\kappa$. The axiom BA($X$) states that given any two $\aleph_1$-dense subsets of $X$, say $A$ and $B$, there is an autohomeomorphism of $X$ mapping $A$ onto $B$. In this parlance BA is equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R$). Surprisingly BA is not equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R^n$) for any finite $1< n < \omega$. In fact BA does not follow from Martin's Axiom (Abraham-Rubin-Shelah) though BA($\mathbb R^n$) does (in fact from $\mathfrak{p} > \aleph_1$) for each $n > 1$ (Steprāns-Watson). In these three lectures I will discuss these ideas and some related ones including the question of when BA($X$) implies BA($Y$) for Polish spaces $X$ and $Y$. Central to these questions are the role of cardinal characteristics including the celebrated theorem of Todorčević that BA implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ as well as a recent, higher dimensional analogue of this result that for any $n < \omega$ BA($\mathbb R^n$) implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ (S.-Steprāns). There are many beautiful open problems in this area and I plan to make discussing them a focal point of the talks. The talks will start slowly and should be accessible to students. Time permitting, the final talk will include some new results. If and when these results are presented, they are joint work with Juris Steprāns. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: April, 25: C.B. Switzer (U Wien), "Baumgartner's Axiom and Cardinal Characteristics: A Sparse Look at Dense Sets of Reals I". https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/EoKqnND8XYdmyL6 Video recordings available so far of the Logic Colloquium: April, 25: J. Lopez-Abad (UNED, Barcelona, ES), "Banach spaces as metric model-theoretical structures". https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/6G4MRfPMzBjYb8e * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/. -- Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, There will be no Wednesday seminar the following two weeks, May 1st and May 8th (public holidays). The seminar should resume on Wednesday May 15th, Jonathan Cancino Manriquez will be presenting his results on basically generated and Tukey-top ultrafilters. Sean Cox will be visiting Prague starting next week, he will give seminar talks on Monday May 6th at the Algebra seminar in Karlin https://www.mff.cuni.cz/cs/math/ka/akce/seminare/algebraicky-seminar and on Tuesday May 7th at the Set Theory and Analysis seminar in the Institute https://www.math.cas.cz/index.php/events/event/3764 Best, David

51st Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Jiachen Yuan from the University of Leeds. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  Apr 26,  from 4pm to 5pm(UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: What happens at the limit of a sequence of models of ZFC

Abstract: The technique of taking the tail model is an understudied object in the study of Mathematical logic. With Assaf Rinot and Zhixing You, we find it is a useful tool for constructing interesting ultrafilters. In this talk, I'll illustrate how we use it to answer a question about $\delta$-complete ultrafilters and to extend some results in infinitary combinatorics.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 51st Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Jiachen Yuan 

Time :16:00pm, Apr. 26, 2024(Beijing Time)

Zoom Number : 734 242 5443

Passcode :477893

Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=84627872662

_____________________________________________________________________


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Hi everyone,

CUNY is on Spring Break through April 30th - however, there are still some logic events happening in and around New York City, at CUNY and beyond.

Hope all is well,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Monday, Apr 22, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 22, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Dave Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 - - - -

Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, April 23, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Schlögl, Technische Universität Wien
Title:  Epistemic Modeling of Truly Private Updates and a Glance at
a New Epistemic Model Checking and Visualization Tool

Abstract: Epistemic logic has been successfully applied to the modeling of epistemic and doxastic attitudes of agents in distributed systems. Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) adds communication via model transforming updates. Since agents in distributed systems often exchange information without other agents knowing, however, the commonly known model updates in DEL are generally not adequate for describing fully private communication. In this talk, I will present a novel update mechanism for solving the fully private consistent update synthesis task: designing a model update that makes a given goal formula true while maintaining the consistency of the agents’ beliefs.

In addition, I will provide a first glimpse of the alpha version of a performant epistemic model checking and visualization tool I am currently working on. Model-checking allows us to verify whether a finite-state model (typically represented as a Kripke structure) satisfies a given specification. Many model-checking tools exist for a variety of logical languages, including epistemic logic. To effectively support foundational theoretical research like developing sound and efficient fully private model updates, however, a tool is needed that simultaneously provides:
.) a flexible and intuitive user interface,
.) powerful visualization capabilities for large models (>10,000 states),
.) a performant model-checking algorithm that also provides explanations/proofs/counter-examples
.) easy extendability w.r.t. logical language features and model generation/updates


- - - - Wednesday, Apr 24, 2024 - - - -


- - - - Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 - - - -


- - - - Friday, Apr 26, 2024 - - - -




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Monday, Apr 29, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Anandi Hattiangadi (Stockholm).
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap

Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.



- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.

Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing

We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.




Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type

In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy  and topological pressure  on compact shift spaces  and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function  is not computable for a large set of shift spaces  and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).




- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday April 24th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Jonathan has some major results and he will give a couple of talks on these new things. Jonathan Cancino Manriquez -- Introduction to Tukey types of ultrafilters on the natural numbers This will be an introductory talk to the Tukey types of ultrafilters on the natural numbers. We will review some of the classical facts related to Tukey top ultrafilters and basically generated ultrafilters. The talks will be mostly based on the papers "Tukey classes of ultrafilters on ω" (D. Millovich), and "Tukey types of ultrafilters" (N. Dobrinen and S. Todorcevic). Best, David

Set theory and topology seminar 23.04.2024 Tomasz Żuchowski

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 23.04.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"The Nikodym property and filters on $\omega$. Part II"
will be presented by

Tomasz Żuchowski


Abstract: 
In this talk we will continue studying the family $\mathcal{AN}$ of ideals on $\omega$ presented in the Part I. Recall that $\mathcal{I}\in\mathcal{AN}$ iff there exists a density submeasure $\varphi$ on $\omega$ such that $\varphi(\omega)=\infty$ and $\mathcal{I}\subseteq Exh(\varphi)$. 
We will present several conditions for a density ideal $\mathcal{I}$ equivalent to the fact that $\mathcal{I}\in\mathcal{AN}$. Next, we will make an analysis of the cofinal structure of the family $\mathcal{AN}$  ordered by the Katetov order $\leq_K$. We will prove that there is a family of size $\mathfrak{d}$ which is $\leq_K$-dominating in $\mathcal{AN}$, but there are no $\leq_K$-maximal elements in $\mathcal{AN}$.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia


KGRC Talks - April 25

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14--16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, April 25, 11:30am--1:00pm, hybrid mode "Baumgartner's Axiom and Cardinal Characteristics: A Sparse Look at Dense Sets of Reals" C. B. Switzer (U Wien) Mini-course (25.04.2024-16.05.2024, 3 lectures) - 1st lecture: Given a cardinal $\kappa$, a set of reals $A\subseteq \mathbb R$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with any open interval has size $\kappa$. Baumgartner's axiom (BA)---proved consistent by Baumgartner in 1973---states that all $\aleph_1$-dense sets of reals are order isomorphic with the induced linear order from $\mathbb R$. This is the most straightforward generalization to the uncountable of Cantor's proof that all countable dense linear orders without endpoints are order isomorphic. BA has variations to other topological spaces---given a topological space $X$, a subset $A \subseteq X$ is $\kappa$-dense if its intersection with each non-empty open subset has size $\kappa$. The axiom BA($X$) states that given any two $\aleph_1$-dense subsets of $X$, say $A$ and $B$, there is an autohomeomorphism of $X$ mapping $A$ onto $B$. In this parlance BA is equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R$). Surprisingly BA is not equivalent to BA ($\mathbb R^n$) for any finite $1< n < \omega$. In fact BA does not follow from Martin's Axiom (Abraham-Rubin-Shelah) though BA($\mathbb R^n$) does (in fact from $\mathfrak{p} > \aleph_1$) for each $n > 1$ (Steprāns-Watson). In these three lectures I will discuss these ideas and some related ones including the question of when BA($X$) implies BA($Y$) for Polish spaces $X$ and $Y$. Central to these questions are the role of cardinal characteristics including the celebrated theorem of Todorčević that BA implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ as well as a recent, higher dimensional analogue of this result that for any $n < \omega$ BA($\mathbb R^n$) implies $\mathfrak b > \aleph_1$ (S.-Steprāns). There are many beautiful open problems in this area and I plan to make discussing them a focal point of the talks. The talks will start slowly and should be accessible to students. Time permitting, the final talk will include some new results. If and when these results are presented, they are joint work with Juris Steprāns. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Logic Colloquium Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090, 2nd floor, HS 11, Thursday, April 25, 3:00pm--3:50pm, hybrid mode "Banach spaces as metric model-theoretical structures" J. López Abad, UNED, Barcelona, ES Banach spaces are a reach family of metric model structures. We will discuss this in particular focussing on omega-categoricity, ultrahomogeneity and extreme amenability, where also combinatorics plays a crucial role. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at Please direct any questions about this talk to matthias.aschenbrenner@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: April, 18: R. Sullivan (U Münser, DE), "Generic embeddings into Fraïssé structures": https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/riHYm5qikdkPCws Video recordings available so far of the Logic Colloquium: April, 18: C. Agostini (TU Wien), "Countable spaces and realcompactness": https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/6Az7PQPE5x8aEEy * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/

50th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon, but at an irregular time, as we have two speakers this week.

Our speakers this week will be Stevo Todorcevic from the University of Toronto and Dilip Raghavan from the National University of Singapore. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  April 19,  from 2:30 pm to 5 pm (UTC+8, Beijing time). The first talk is offline/online hybrid starting at 2:30pm, and the second talk is online starting at 4pm.

Stevo Todorcevic: 
Title: Ultrafilters in L(R)[U]
Abstract: We give analysis of the inner model L(R)[U] under the assumptions that L(R) is a Solovay model and U is a selective ultrafilter on N. A survey of known results and open problems will be given.

Dilip Raghavan:
Title: Stable ordered-union ultrafilters
Abstract: Stable ordered-union ultrafilters were introduced by Blass in 1987. They stand in the same relation to the Milliken-Taylor theorem as selective ultrafilters do to Ramsey's theorem. In this talk, I will survey some results and problems about stable ordered-union ultrafilters.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 50th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Time(Stevo Todorcevic) :14:30pm, Apr. 19, 2024(Beijing Time)

Time(Dilip Raghavan) :16:00pm, Apr. 19, 2024(Beijing Time)

Zoom Number : 734 242 5443

Passcode :477893

Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=81450804954

_____________________________________________________________________

The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 15, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 15, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Mark Poor, Cornell
Shelah groups in ZFC



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 15, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Jessica Collins (Columbia)
Title: Imaging is Alpha + Aizerman

Abstract: I give a non-probabilistic account of the imaging revision process. Most familiar in its various probabilistic forms, imaging was introduced by David Lewis (1976) as the form of belief revision appropriate for supposing subjunctively that a hypothesis be true. It has played a central role in the semantics of subjunctive conditionals, in causal decision theory, and, less well known to philosophers, in the computational theory of information retrieval. In the economics literature, non-probabilistic imaging functions have been called “pseudo-rationalizable choice functions”. I show that the imaging functions are precisely those which satisfy both Sen’s Alpha Principle (aka “Chernoff’s Axiom”) and the Aizerman Axiom. This result allows us to see very clearly the formal relationship between non-probabilistic imaging and AGM revision (which is Alpha + Beta).




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 16, 2024 - - - -

Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, April 16, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link: contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Lukas Zenger, University of Bern
Title: Intuitionistic modal logic with the master modality

Abstract: I present a cyclic sequent calculus for intuitionistic modal logic with the master modality. Formulas of the logic are evaluated over bi-relational Kripke models with three different frame conditions: functional frames, `triangle' confluent frames, and arbitrary frames. It is shown that the calculus is sound and complete for all three classes of models. This, in particular, proves that intuitionistic modal logic with the master modality cannot distinguish between arbitrary models and functional models. Soundness is established by a standard argument while completeness is proven via a detour to non-wellfounded proofs, using a proof-search argument that draws on analyticity of the calculus. The framework is robust in the sense that it can be naturally adapted to account for various frame conditions, such as serial models, reflexive models or S4-models, as well as for a polymodal extension that can be interpreted as intuitionistic common knowledge. This is joint work with Lide Grotenhuis, Bahareh Afshari and Graham Leigh.




- - - - Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 18, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 19, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 19, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Philip Scowcroft, Wesleyan University
Some applications of model theory to lattice-ordered groups

When does a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group embed into a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group with strong unit? After explaining the meaning of this question, I will describe some partial answers obtained via model theory.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 22, 2024 - - - -

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 - - - -

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Wednesday, Apr 24, 2024 - - - -

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 - - - -

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Friday, Apr 26, 2024 - - - -

*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***

- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.




- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

--------  ADMINISTRIVIA  --------

To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.

 

KGRC Talks - April 18

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following talks: Set Theory Seminar Kolingasse 14–16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, April 18, 11:30am–1:00pm, hybrid mode "Generic embeddings into Fraïssé structures" R. Sullivan (U Münster, DE) This project, in the writing-up stage, is work with A. Codenotti (Münster), A. Panagiotopoulos (Vienna) and J. Winkel. Let M be a Fraïssé structure (eg the random graph), and let A be a countably infinite structure which is embeddable in M. If M has free amalgamation, then there exists a Katetov embedding of A into M: an embedding such that each automorphism of A extends to an automorphism of M. Is this embedding "common" or "uncommon"? To answer this, we investigate generic embeddings of A into M. An embedding of A into M is said to be generic if it lies in a comeagre set inside the Polish space Emb(A, M). We will answer the following three questions: - When are two embeddings of A into M generically isomorphic via an automorphism of M? - When is A generically corigid (i.e. Aut(M/A) trivial)? - Let g lie in Aut(A). When is g generically extensible to an automorphism of M? We will also discuss a wide range of examples in the context of these three questions. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact richard.springer@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Logic Colloquium Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090, 2nd floor, HS 11, Thursday, April 18, 3:00pm--3:50pm, hybrid mode "Countable spaces and realcompactness" C. Agostini (TU Wien) In this talk, we analyze the realcompactness number of countable spaces. We will show that, for every cardinal $\kappa$, there exists a countable crowded space $X$ such that $\mathsf{Exp}(X)=\kappa$ if and only if $\mathfrak{p}\leq\kappa\leq\mathfrak{c}$. On the other hand, we show that a scattered space of weight $\kappa$ has pseudocharacter at most $\kappa$ in any compactification. will allow us to calculate $\mathsf{Exp}(X)$ for an arbitrary (that is, not necessarily crowded) countable space. This is a joint work with Andrea Medini and Lyubomyr Zdomskyy. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact richard.springer@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to matthias.aschenbrenner@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: April, 11: J. M. Millhouse (U Wien), "Definable well-orderings of a large continuum". https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/twWpnZPHd8DscTe Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- Mag. Petra Czarnecki de Czarnce-Chalupa Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

Set theory and toplogy seminar 16.04.2024 Krzysztof Zakrzewski (UW)

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 16.04.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"Function spaces on Corson-like compacta"
will be presented by

Krzysztof Zakrzewski (MIM UW)


Abstract: 
Recall that a compact space is Eberlein compact if it is homeomorphic to a subspace of some Banach space equipped with the weak topology. A compact space is \omega-Corson compact if it embeds into a \sigma-product of real lines, that is a subspace of the product R^{\Gamma} consisting of sequences with finitely many nonzero coordinates for some set \Gamma. 
Every  \omega-Corson compact space is Eberlein compact. For a Tichonoff space X, let Cp(X) denote the space of real continuous functions on X endowed with the pointwise convergence topology.
During the talk we will show that the class \omega-Corson compact spaces K is invariant under linear homeomorphism of function spaces Cp(K) and other related results.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski



Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, There will be no seminar tomorrow, Wednesday April 10th due to the expected lack of speakers. (Apologies for the late notice.) The seminar will again next week, Wednesday April 17th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Ziemowit Kostana -- Diamond on Kurepa trees I will discuss a restricted variant of Jensen's Diamond, that is guessing only cofinal branches of a given Kurepa tree. It turns out to be a very weak guessing principle, in particular does not imply CH, and follows from Club. Nevertheless, this weak variant may still consistently fail. This is joint work with Assaf Rinot and Saharon Shelah. Best, David

Two Related Seminars in Geometry and Topology by Shlpak Banerjee and in Logic by Philipp Kunde on Wednesday 17 April 2024

NUS Logic Seminar
On 17 April 2024 there will be two related lectures in two seminar series at the NUS. At 15:30 hrs, Dr. Shilpak Banerjee will give talk at Geometry&Topology seminar with title "(Anti-)classification results in Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory" in S17-05-12, (Abstract_talk1). At 17:00 hrs, Dr. Philipp Kunde will present at logic seminar in S17-04-05 with title Non-classifiability of ergodic flows up to time change, (Abstract_talk2). Best regards, Frank and Yue for Logic Seminar, Daren for Geometry and Topology Seminar; all of us at Department of Mathematics, NUS.

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 8, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 8, Hill Center, Hill 705, SPECIAL TIME: 4:00pm
Jing Zhang, Toronto
Squares, ultrafilters and forcing axioms



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 8, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Asya Passinsky (CEU)
Title: Social construction and meta-ground

Abstract: The notion of social construction plays an important role in many areas of social philosophy, including the philosophy of gender, the philosophy of race, and social ontology. But it is far from clear how this notion (or cluster of notions) is to be understood. One promising proposal, which has been championed in recent years by Aaron Griffith (2017, 2018) and Jonathan Schaffer (2017), is that the notion of constitutive social construction may be analyzed in terms of the notion of metaphysical grounding. In this paper, I argue that a simple ground-theoretic analysis of social construction is subject to two sorts of problem cases and that existing ground-theoretic accounts do not avoid these problems. I then develop a novel ground-theoretic account of social construction in terms of meta-ground, and I argue that it avoids the problems. The core idea of the account is that in cases of social construction, the meta-ground of the relevant grounding fact includes a suitable connective social fact.




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 9, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, April 9, 1pm
Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Representations of lattices

Following up on the series of talks on the history of the problem, in this talk we will discuss the main technique for realizing finite lattices as interstructure lattices, due to Schmerl in 1986. We will motivate this technique by studying an example: the Boolean algebra B2. We will see how we can modify the technique to produce elementary extensions realizing specific ranked lattices to ensure that such extensions are end, cofinal, or mixed extensions.




- - - - Wednesday, Apr 10, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker:     Ellis D. Cooper.
Date and Time:     Wednesday April 10, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON
Title:     Pulse Diagrams and Category Theory.

Abstract: ``Pulse diagrams'' are motivated by the ubiquity of pulsation in biology, from action potentials, to heartbeat, to respiration, and at longer time-scales to circadian rhythms and even to human behavior. The syntax of the diagrams is simple, and the semantics are easy to define and simulate with Python code. They express behaviors of parts and wholes as in categorical mereology, but are missing a compositional framework, like string diagrams. Examples to discuss include cellular automata, leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons, harmonic frequency generation, Gillespie algorithm for the chemical master equation, piecewise-linear genetic regulatory networks, Lotka-Volterra systems, and if time permits, aspects of the adaptive immune system. The talk is more about questions than about answers.




- - - - Thursday, Apr 11, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 12, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 12, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Boban Velickovic University of Paris



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 12, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Geometric tools for the decidability of the existential theory of 

I will give a brief survey how tools from algebraic geometry can be used in finding solutions to Diophantine equations over  and similar rings. These tools include Artin approximation, arc spaces, motives and resolution of singularities. This approach yields the definability of the existential theory of  (in the ring language with a constant for ) contingent upon the validity of resolution of singularities (Denef-Schoutens). Anscombe-Fehm proved a weaker result using model-theoretic tools and together with Dittmann, they gave a proof assuming only the weaker 'local uniformization conjecture.'




Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 15, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 15, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Mark Poor, Cornell



Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 15, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Jessica Collins (Columbia)
Title: Imaging is Alpha + Aizerman

Abstract: I give a non-probabilistic account of the imaging revision process. Most familiar in its various probabilistic forms, imaging was introduced by David Lewis (1976) as the form of belief revision appropriate for supposing subjunctively that a hypothesis be true. It has played a central role in the semantics of subjunctive conditionals, in causal decision theory, and, less well known to philosophers, in the computational theory of information retrieval. In the economics literature, non-probabilistic imaging functions have been called “pseudo-rationalizable choice functions”. I show that the imaging functions are precisely those which satisfy both Sen’s Alpha Principle (aka “Chernoff’s Axiom”) and the Aizerman Axiom. This result allows us to see very clearly the formal relationship between non-probabilistic imaging and AGM revision (which is Alpha + Beta).




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 16, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 18, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 19, 2024 - - - -

Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 19, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Philip Scowcroft, Wesleyan University
Some applications of model theory to lattice-ordered groups

When does a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group embed into a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group with strong unit? After explaining the meaning of this question, I will describe some partial answers obtained via model theory.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.

 

Logic Seminar Tuesday 9 April 2023 by Piotr Kowalski

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Tuesday, 9 April 2023, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#05-11 Speaker: Piotr Kowalski Title: Model Completeness and Matrix Groups Abstract: I plan to discuss the notions of model companion and model completeness focusing on algebraic and geometric examples. For instance, I will mention recent joint work with Daniel Max Hoffmann, Chieu-Minh Tran and Jinhe Ye, where we consider model completeness of certain matrix groups. URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html

KGRC Talk - April 11

Kurt Godel Research Center
KGRC/Institute of Mathematics invites you to the following Set Theory Seminar talk: ”Definable well-orderings of a large continuum” J. M. Millhouse (U Wien) Kolingasse 14–16, 1090, 1st floor, SR 10, Thursday, April 11, 11:30am–1:00pm, hybrid mode This is the first in a series of talks where I will be going over the history and the more recent advancements in forcing techniques used to produce models of set theory where the continuum is strictly greater than \(\aleph_1\), a projective well-order of the reals. In the first talk we will establish preliminaries, understand the motivation for obtaining such models, and go over L. Harrington's initial 1977 construction. Subsequent talks will focus on some more recent results, including applications of the techniques to the theory of cardinal characteristics and the definability of various combinatorial sets of reals. Zoom info: If you have not received the Zoom data by the day before the talk, please contact petra.czarnecki@univie.ac.at. Please direct any questions about this talk to vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. * * * * * * * * * Video recordings available so far of the Set Theory Seminar: March, 21: M. Iannela (TU Wien), "(Piecewise) convex embeddability on linear orders" https://ucloud.univie.ac.at/index.php/s/eMc25cWsJzswFAx * * * * * * * * * Updates at https://kgrc.univie.ac.at/eventsnews/ -- Mag. Petra Czarnecki de Czarnce-Chalupa Institute of Mathematics (Kurt Goedel Research Center, Logic) University of Vienna Kolingasse 14-16, #7.48 1090 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43/ (0)1 4277-50501

Nankai Logic Colloquium paused for two weeks

Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello Everyone,

Our Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to pause for these two weeks (April 5th and April 12th) for The 4th International Conference on Topological Algebras and Their Applications, which is currently being held at Nankai University.

The Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be resumed after two weeks (April 19th). On that day we are going to have two talks: one given by Stevo Todorcevic and one given by Dilip Raghavan.

See you online in two weeks!

Best wishes,
Ming Xiao



Set theory and topology seminar 9.04.2024 Jakub Rondos

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 9.04.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"Topological properties of compact spaces K that are preserved by isomorphisms of C(K)"
will be presented by

Jakub Rondos (University of Vienna)


Abstract: 
In the talk, we present some newly discovered properties of compact Hausdorff spaces that are preserved by isomorphisms of their Banach spaces of continuous functions. 


Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Luca Motto Ros)

Cross-Alps Logic Seminar
On Friday 05.04.2024 at 16.00 CEST
Luca Motto Ros (University of Torino)
will give a talk on 
Borel complexity of graph homomorphism

Please refer to the usual webpage of our LogicGroup for more details and the abstract of the talk.

The seminar will be held remotely through Webex. Please write to vincenzo.dimonte [at] uniud [dot] it for the link to the event.

The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.

All the best,
Vincenzo

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 1, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics

Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, April 2, 1pm

Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Representations of lattices

Following up on the series of talks on the history of the problem, in this talk we will discuss the main technique for realizing finite lattices as interstructure lattices, due to Schmerl in 1986. We will motivate this technique by studying an example: the Boolean algebra . We will see how we can modify the technique to produce elementary extensions realizing specific ranked lattices to ensure that such extensions are end, cofinal, or mixed extensions.



Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 
(online) 
Tuesday, April 2, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM 
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov
Speaker: Sonja J.L. Smets, The University of Amsterdam 
Title: Reasoning about Epistemic Superiority and Data Exchange

Abstract: In this presentation I focus on a framework that generalizes dynamic epistemic logic in order to model a wider range of scenarios including those in which agents read or communicate (or somehow gain access to) all the information stored at specific sources, or possessed by some other agents (including information of a non-propositional nature, such as data, passwords, secrets etc). The resulting framework allows one to reason about the state of affairs in which one agent (or group of agents) has ‘epistemic superiority’ over another agent (or group). I will present different examples of epistemic superiority and I will draw a connection to the logic of functional dependence by A. Baltag and J. van Benthem. At the level of group attitudes, I will further introduce the new concept of 'common distributed knowledge', which combines features of both common knowledge and distributed knowledge. This presentation is based on joint work with A. Baltag in [1].  

[1] A. Baltag and S. Smets, Learning what others know, in L. Kovacs and E. Albert (eds.), LPAR23 proceedings of the International Conference on Logic for Programming, AI and Reasoning, EPiC Series in Computing, 73:90-110, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29007/plm4




- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -

Philog Seminar
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
April 5, Friday, 10 AM
Zoom meeting, please contact Rohit Parikh for zoom link
Gilberto Gomes, Northern Rio de Janeiro State University
The Implicative Conditional

This talk will present and discuss the paper The implicative conditional, by Eric Raidl and myself, recently published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (with free access). The paper presents a proposal for a strong conditional, that is, one that really expresses that the consequent is a consequence of the antecedent, or that the antecedent is a sufficient reason for believing the consequent, in a given context. We claim that the implicative conditional describes the logical behavior of an empirically defined class of natural language conditionals, also named implicative conditionals, which excludes concessive and some other conditionals. The logical properties of this conditional in a reflexive normal Kripke semantics will be discussed. Its axiomatic system, which was proved sound and complete, will be presented. The implicative conditional avoids the paradoxes of the material and strict conditionals, presents connexive properties, and assures the relevance of the antecedent to the consequent.



Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Meng-Che 'Turbo' Ho, California State University at Northridge
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations

In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.

Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.



Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 8, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 8, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Jing Zhang


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 8, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Asya Passinsky (CEU)
Title: Social construction and meta-ground

Abstract: The notion of social construction plays an important role in many areas of social philosophy, including the philosophy of gender, the philosophy of race, and social ontology. But it is far from clear how this notion (or cluster of notions) is to be understood. One promising proposal, which has been championed in recent years by Aaron Griffith (2017, 2018) and Jonathan Schaffer (2017), is that the notion of constitutive social construction may be analyzed in terms of the notion of metaphysical grounding. In this paper, I argue that a simple ground-theoretic analysis of social construction is subject to two sorts of problem cases and that existing ground-theoretic accounts do not avoid these problems. I then develop a novel ground-theoretic account of social construction in terms of meta-ground, and I argue that it avoids the problems. The core idea of the account is that in cases of social construction, the meta-ground of the relevant grounding fact includes a suitable connective social fact.




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 9, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Apr 10, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 11, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 12, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 12, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Boban Velickovic University of Paris



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 12, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417

Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Geometric tools for the decidability of the existential theory of 

I will give a brief survey how tools from algebraic geometry can be used in finding solutions to Diophantine equations over  and similar rings. These tools include Artin approximation, arc spaces, motives and resolution of singularities. This approach yields the definability of the existential theory of  (in the ring language with a constant for ) contingent upon the validity of resolution of singularities (Denef-Schoutens). Anscombe-Fehm proved a weaker result using model-theoretic tools and together with Dittmann, they gave a proof assuming only the weaker 'local uniformization conjecture.'





- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.

 

- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday April 3rd at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Sam Braunfeld -- S_infinity-invariance in random expansions and Keisler measures We will be concerned with randomly expanding an omega-categorical structure M to a larger language in an Aut(M)-invariant manner. We show that under certain conditions, such an expansion is not just Aut(M)-invariant but fully S_infinity-invariant, which allows us to classify such expansions. We show that the problem of classifying Aut(M)-invariant Keisler measures on M-definable subsets may be seen as a special case of this problem. The resulting classifications of Aut(M)-invariant Keisler measures yield natural examples of (simple) theories where there are non-forking formulas that are universally measure zero. This is joint work-in-progress with Colin Jahel and Paolo Marimon. Best, David

49th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,

This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos from the Kurt Gödel Research Center. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  Mar 29,  from 4pm to 5pm(UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title. Strong ergodicity phenomena for Bernoulli shifts of bounded algebraic dimension

Abstract. For every Polish permutation group $P\leq \mathrm{Sym}(\mathbb{N})$ let  $A\mapsto [A]_{P}$ be the assignment which maps every $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ to the set of all  $k\in \mathbb{N}$ whose orbit under the action of the stabilizer $P_F$ of some finite $F\subseteq A$ is finite. Then $A\mapsto [A]_{P}$ is a closure operator and hence it endows $P$ with a natural notion of dimension $\mathrm{dim}(P)$. This notion of dimension has been extensively studied in model theory when  $A\mapsto [A]_{P}$  satisfies additionally the \emph{exchange principle}; that is, when $A\mapsto [A]_{P}$  forms a pregeometry. However, under the exchange principle every Polish permutation group $P$ with $\mathrm{dim}(P)<\infty$ is locally compact and therefore unable to generate any ``wild" dynamics.

 In this talk we will discuss the relationship between  $\mathrm{dim}(P)$ and certain strong ergodicity phenomena in the absence of the exchange principle. In particular, for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$ we will provide a Polish permutation group $P$, with $\mathrm{dim}(P)=n$, whose  Bernoulli shift $P\curvearrowright \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}$ is generically ergodic relative to the injective part of the Bernoulli shift of any permutation group $Q$ with $\mathrm{dim}(Q)<n$. We will use this to exhibit an equivalence relation of pinned cardinal $\aleph_1^{+}$ which strongly resembles Zapletal's counterexample to a question of Kechris, but which does not Borel reduce to the latter.  Our proofs rely on the theory of  symmetric models of choiceless set-theory and in the process we establish that a vast collection of  symmetric models admit a theory of supports similar to the basic Cohen model. This is joint work with Assaf Shani.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 49th Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos 

Time :16:00pm, Mar. 29, 2024(Beijing Time)

Zoom Number : 734 242 5443

Passcode :477893

_____________________________________________________________________

The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




Logic Seminar Talks 27 March 2024 and 3 April 2024 at NUS

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore for the following subsequent two talks, see also the webpage http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html (a) Date: Wednesday, 27 March 2023, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-05 Speaker: Kyle Gannon Title: Model Theoretic Events Abstract: This talk is motivated by the following two soft questions: How do we sample an infinite sequence from a first order structure? What model theoretic properties might hold on almost all sampled sequences? We advance a plausible framework in an attempt to answer these kinds of questions. The central object of this talk is a proability space. The underlying set of our space is a standard model theoretic object, namely the space of types in countably many variables over a monster model. Our probability measure is an iterated Morley product of a fixed Borel-definable Keisler measure. Choosing a point randomly in this space with respect to our distribution yields a random generic type in infinitely many variables. We are interested in which model theoretic events hold for almost all random generic types. Two different kinds of events will be discussed: (1) The event that the induced structure on a random generic type is isomorphic to a fixed structure; (2) the event that a random generic type witnesses a dividing line. This work is joint with James Hanson. (b) Date: Wednesday 3 April 2023, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-05 Speaker: Frank Stephan Title: Fuzzy Logic and Completeness Abstract: Fuzzy Logic allows either finitely many truth values of the form 0,1/k,2/k,...,k/k or an infinite number of truth values which is dense in the real interval from 0 to 1 and which includes the two end-points 0 and 1. The specific properties depend on the formulas chosen for calculating logical connectives; for this talk, the following are chosen: NOT q is 1-q; p OR q is max{p,q}; p AND q is min{p,q}; p EOR q is min{p+q,2-p-q}; p IMPLIES q is min{1,1+q-p}; p EQUIV q is min{1+p-q,1+q-p}. An interesting question is when is the Fuzzy Logic with these truth-values complete in the following sense, for Propositional Logic: One says that S logically implies alpha iff for all truth-assignments for the atoms which make all formulas in S have the truth value 1 it also holds that alpha has the truth value 1. The question is now whether there is a set of axioms for the Propositional Fuzzy Logic which allows to prove alpha from S and these axioms. Vilem Novak has proven in 1980 that this is the case when there are only finitely many truth-values 0,1/k,2/k,...,k/k; furthermore, this talk will provide a countable set S of propositional formulas which logically imply one atoms B such that, whenever there is an infinite set of truth-values, no finite subset T of S logically implies B. Hence one can for infinitely many truth-values not expect completeness, independently of what axioms one allows. Furthermore, the set of axioms must depend on the number of truth-values k+1 in the case of finitely many values. This is joint work with Neo Wei Qing and Wong Tin Lok.

UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
Please note the addition of a talk in the MOPA seminar this Tuesday, 3/26 (tomorrow) by Roman Kossak.

Best,
Jonas


This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Mar 25, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Mar 25, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Arthur Apter, CUNY
A Choiceless Answer to a Question of Woodin


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, March 25, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Dan Marshall (Lingnan)
Title: A moderate theory of overall resemblance

Abstract: This paper defends the moderate theory of overall resemblance stated by: A) y is at least as similar to x as z is iff: i) every resemblance property shared by x and z is also shared by x and y, and ii) for any resemblance family of properties F, y is at least as similar to x as z is with respect to F. In this account, a resemblance property is a property that corresponds to a genuine respect in which two things can resemble each other, whereas a resemblance family is a set of properties with respect to which things can be more or less similar to each other. An example of a resemblance property is being cubical, an example of a non-resemblance property is being either a gold cube or a silver sphere, and an example of a resemblance family is the set of specific mass properties.



- - - - Tuesday, Mar 26, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, March 26, 1pm

Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of PA: Part ii

The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N. I will talk about the history of the problem, from the seminal paper of Haim Gaifman from 1976 and other early results to some recent work of Jim Schmerl. There is much to talk about.




Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, March 26 Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link:  contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Studer, University of Bern
Title: Simplicial Complexes for Epistemic Logic

Abstract: In formal epistemology, group knowledge is often modeled as the knowledge that the group would have if the agents shared all their individual knowledge. However, this interpretation does not account for relations between agents. In this talk, we propose the notion of synergistic knowledge, which makes it possible to model different relationships between agents, e.g., groups of agents having access to shared objects. As an example, we model the problem of dining cryptographers.


- - - - Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Mar 28, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Mar 29, 2024 - - - -

** NO CLASSES AT CUNY GRADUATE CENTER **


Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 1, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics

Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Meng-Che 'Turbo' Ho, California State University at Northridge
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations

In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.

Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.

 

- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

Set theory and topology seminar 26.03.2024 Tomasz Żuchowski

Wrocław Set Theory Seminar
I am happy to announce that at the seminar in set theory and topology (on Tuesday 26.03.2024 at 17:15 in room A.4.1 C-19  (Wrocław University of Science and Technology) the lecture:
"The Nikodym property and filters on $\omega$. Part I"
will be presented by

Tomasz Żuchowski


Abstract: 
For a free filter $F$ on $\omega$, we consider the space $N_F=\omega\cup\{p_F\}$, where every element of $\omega$ is isolated and open neighborhoods of $p_F$ are of the form $A\cup\{p_F\}$ for $A\in F$. 
In this talk we will study the family $\mathcal{AN}$ of such ideals $\mathcal{I}$ on $\omega$ that the space $N_{\mathcal{I}^*}$ carries a sequence $\langle\mu_n\colon n\in\omega\rangle$ of finitely supported signed measures satisfying $\|\mu_n\|\rightarrow\infty$ and $\mu_n(A)\rightarrow 0$ for every $A\in Clopen(N_{\mathcal{I}^*})$. If $\mathcal{I}\in\mathcal{AN}$ and $N_{\mathcal{I}^*}$ is embeddable into the Stone space $St(\mathcal{A})$ of a given Boolean algebra $\mathcal{A}$, then $\mathcal{A}$ does not have the Nikodym property.

Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.

I'm looking forward to seeing You
Szymon Żeberski

(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski  and myself)


About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19. 


*****************************************************************************************************************

Our webpages:
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Mar 25, 2024 - - - -

Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Mar 25, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Arthur Apter, CUNY
A Choiceless Answer to a Question of Woodin


Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, March 25, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Dan Marshall (Lingnan)
Title: A moderate theory of overall resemblance

Abstract: This paper defends the moderate theory of overall resemblance stated by: A) y is at least as similar to x as z is iff: i) every resemblance property shared by x and z is also shared by x and y, and ii) for any resemblance family of properties F, y is at least as similar to x as z is with respect to F. In this account, a resemblance property is a property that corresponds to a genuine respect in which two things can resemble each other, whereas a resemblance family is a set of properties with respect to which things can be more or less similar to each other. An example of a resemblance property is being cubical, an example of a non-resemblance property is being either a gold cube or a silver sphere, and an example of a resemblance family is the set of specific mass properties.



- - - - Tuesday, Mar 26, 2024 - - - -

Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, March 26 Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link:  contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Studer, University of Bern
Title: Simplicial Complexes for Epistemic Logic

Abstract: In formal epistemology, group knowledge is often modeled as the knowledge that the group would have if the agents shared all their individual knowledge. However, this interpretation does not account for relations between agents. In this talk, we propose the notion of synergistic knowledge, which makes it possible to model different relationships between agents, e.g., groups of agents having access to shared objects. As an example, we model the problem of dining cryptographers.


- - - - Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Mar 28, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Mar 29, 2024 - - - -

** NO CLASSES AT CUNY GRADUATE CENTER **


Next Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Apr 1, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics

Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.




- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock



Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Meng-Che 'Turbo' Ho, California State University at Northridge
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations

In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.

Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.



- - - - Other Logic News - - - -

CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
Northeast Model Theory Day
We are pleased to announce that Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT will be hosting a Northeast Model Theory Day on Saturday May 4, 2024. This one-day meeting is the first in what we hope will become an annual series, bringing together those interested in model theory from across the region.

Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)

All are welcome, but please register by Monday, April 22nd. Limited travel support is available. For more information and registration, please visit http://nemtd24.wescreates.wesleyan.edu/

NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.

 

- - - - Web Site - - - -

Find us on the web at:  nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)

Wednesday seminar

Prague Set Theory Seminar
Dear all, The seminar meets on Wednesday March 27th at 11:00 in the Institute of Mathematics CAS, Zitna 25, seminar room, 3rd floor, front building. Program: Egbert Thümmel -- Old questions for young people I will present questions that arose in this seminar in the old days and which we could not solve, but to which the young people in the seminar will know an answer. Best, David

48th Nankai Logic Colloquium

Nankai Logic Colloquium

Hello everyone,


This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.

Our speaker this week will be Dominique Lecomte from Sorbonne University. This talk is going to take place this Friday,  Mar 22,  from 4pm to 5pm(UTC+8, Beijing time). 

Title: Descriptive properties of the irrationality type

Abstract. We present a bridge between descriptive set theory and number theory. The number-theoretic function defined by the irrationality type measures how well an irrational number can be approximated by rational numbers. We give and prove descriptive properties of the type function. In particular, it has a universality property. This is joint work with W. Banks and A. Harcharras.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.

Title :The 48th Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Dominique Lecomte
Time :16:00pm, Mar. 22, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 734 242 5443
Passcode :477893
Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=87996387829

_____________________________________________________________________

The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893


Best wishes,

Ming Xiao




Logic Seminar 20 March 2024 17:00 hrs by Sun Mengzhou

NUS Logic Seminar
Invitation to the Logic Seminar at the National University of Singapore Date: Wednesday, 20 March 2023, 17:00 hrs Place: NUS, Department of Mathematics, S17#04-05 Speaker: Sun Mengzhou Title: The Kaufmann-Clote question on end extensions of models of arithmetic URL: http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~fstephan/logicseminar.html A general question in the model theory of arithmetic is: For each theories S, T and natural number n, is it true that every countable sufficiently saturated model of S has a proper n-elementary end extension to a model of a T? Efforts over the past four decades have revealed answers to this question for S and T in the induction-collection hierarchy IΣ_n, BΣ_n, except the following instance by Clote and Kaufmann: Is it true that, given any integer n, every countable model of BΣ_n+2 has a proper n-elementary end extension to a model of BΣ_n+1? We present a positive answer to the Kaufmann-Clote question. The proof consists of a second-order ultrapower construction based on a low basis theorem. We also include a survey on the results related to the general question above. This is a joint work with Tin Lok Wong and Yue Yang.

This Week in Logic at CUNY

This Week in Logic at CUNY
This Week in Logic at CUNY:

- - - - Monday, Mar 18, 2024 - - - -

Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, March 18, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Michał Godziszewski (Warsaw).
Title: Modal quantifiers, potential infinity, and Yablo sequences

Abstract: When properly arithmetized, Yablo’s paradox results in a set of formulas which (with local disquotation in the background) turns out to be consistent, but omega-inconsistent. Adding either uniform disquotation or the omega-rule results in  inconsistency. Since the paradox involves an infinite sequence of sentences, one might think that it doesn’t arise in finitary contexts. We study whether it does. It turns out that the issue depends on how the finitistic approach is formalized. On one of them, proposed by Marcin Mostowski, all the paradoxical sentences simply fail to hold. This happens at a price: the underlying finitistic arithmetic itself is omega-inconsistent. Finally, when studied in the context of a finitistic approach which preserves the truth of standard arithmetic, the paradox strikes back — it does so with double force, for now the inconsistency can be obtained without the use of uniform disquotation or the omega-rule.

Note: This is joint work with Rafał Urbaniak (Gdańsk).




- - - - Tuesday, Mar 19, 2024 - - - -

MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, March 19, 1pm

Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of PA

The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N. I will talk about the history of the problem, from the seminal paper of Haim Gaifman from 1976 and other early results to some recent work of Jim Schmerl. There is much to talk about.



Computational Logic Seminar  
Spring 2024 
(online)
Tuesday, March 19, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM 
zoom link: contact Sergei Artremov sartemov@gmail.com
SpeakerTudor ProtopopescuCUNY
Title: Logics of Intuitionistic Knowledge and Verification

Abstract: We present intuitionistic epistemic systems IEL-, IEL and IEL+, systems of verification based belief, knowledge and strict knowledge. The intuitionistic epistemic language captures basic reasoning about intuitionistic knowledge and belief, but its language has expressive limitations. Following Gödel's explication of IPC as a fragment of the more expressive system of classical modal logic S4, we present a faithful embedding of the intuitionistic systems into S4 extended with a verification modality. These systems in turn have explicit counterparts in the Logic of Proofs extended with a verification modality.



- - - - Wednesday, Mar 20, 2024 - - - -

The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL:  http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html

Speaker:     Sina Hazratpour, Johns Hopkins University.

Date and Time:     Wednesday March 20, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM.

Title:     Fibred Categories in Lean.


Abstract: Fibred categories are one of the most important and useful concepts in category theory and its application in categorical logic. In this talk I present my recent formalization of fibred categories in the interactive theorem prover Lean 4. I begin by highlighting certain technical challenges associated with handling the equality of objects and functors within the extensional dependent type system of Lean, and how they can be overcome. In this direction, I will demonstrate how we can take advantage of dependent coercion, instance synthesis, and automation tactics from the Lean toolbox. Finally I will discuss a formalization of Homotopy Type Theory in Lean 4 using a fired categorical framework.




- - - - Thursday, Mar 21, 2024 - - - -



- - - - Friday, Mar 22, 2024 - - - -

Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, March 22, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.

Arthur Apter, CUNY
A choiceless answer to a question of Woodin

In a lecture presented in July 2023, Moti Gitik discussed the following question from the 1980s due to Woodin, as well as approaches to its solution and why it is so difficult to solve:

Question: Assuming there is no inner model of ZFC with a strong cardinal, is it possible to have a model  of ZFC such that ' and  for every ', together with the existence of an inner model  of ZFC such that for the  so that  and