Logic Seminar 6 Nov 2024 17:00 hrs by Michael Takaaki Leong at NUS
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Monday, Nov 4, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, November 4, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Logic and discrimination
Abstract: My talk is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood’s ideas in her groundbreaking article ‘The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic’ (1993). Although Plumwood’s paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination at the basis of my analysis, I present Plumwood’s ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how?
- - - - Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Nov 6, 2024 - - - -
Philosophy Colloquium
Wednesday Nov 6, 4:15 P.M. to 6:15 P.M, CUNY Graduate Center Room 9206/9207
“A Chancy Theory of Counterfactuals”
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Speaker: David Jaz Myers, NYU Abu Dhabi.
Date and Time: Wednesday November 6, 2024, SPECIAL TIME: 2:00 PM NYC TIME (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Title: Contextads: Para and Kleisli constructions as wreath products.
Abstract: Given a comonad D on a category C, we can produce a double category whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps are Kleisli maps for D --- this is the Kleisli double category kl(D). Given a monoidal right action & : C x M --> C, we can produce a double category Para(&) whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps A -|-> B are pairs (P, f : A & P --> B) of a parameter space P in M and a parameterised map f.
In this talk, we'll see both these as special cases of a general construction: the Ctx construction which takes a *contextad* on a (double) category and produces a new double category. We'll see that this construction is "just" the wreath product of pseudo-monads in Span(Cat). We'll then exploit this observation to find 2-algebraic structure on the Ctx constructions of suitably structured contextads; vastly generalizing the old observation that a colax monoidal comonad has a monoidal Kleisli category.
This is joint work with Matteo Capucci.
- - - - Thursday, Nov 7, 2024 - - - -
Thursday November 7, 2pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 423
Generic dichotomies for Borel homomorphisms for the finite Friedman-Stanley jumps
- - - - Friday, Nov 8, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Geoff Galgon,
Distributivity and Base trees for
For a regular uncountable cardinal, we show that distributivity and base trees for of intermediate height in the cardinal interval exist in certain models. We also show that base trees of height can exist as well as base trees of various heights depending on the spectrum of cardinalities of towers in . These constructions answer questions of V. Fischer, M. Koelbing, and W. Wohofsky in certain models.
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
- - - - Monday, Nov 11, 2024 - - - -
Monday November 11, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Date: Monday, November 11, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Friederike Moltmann (CNRS).
Title: On the ontology and semantics of absence
Abstract: This talk proposes a new semantic analysis of verbs of absence such as ‘lack’ and ‘be missing’. The semantics is based on the notion of a conceptual whole and its (conceptual) parts, which generates both variable embodiments (of the whole and its structural parts) and modal objects of the sort of a ‘lack’. It involves an extension of truthmaker semantics (applied to modal objects) where truthmakers (satisfiers) now include parts of wholes. The talk rehabilitates entities of the sort of ‘lacks’ often subject to ridicule, most notoriously by Chomsky.
- - - - Tuesday, Nov 12, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Nov 13, 2024 - - - -
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday November 13, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM.IN-PERSON TALK. CUNY Graduate Center Room 6417
Title: Decision Problems on Graphs with Sheaves.
- - - - Thursday, Nov 14, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Nov 15, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 15, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Philipp Schlicht Kurt Gödel Research Center
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 15, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Russell Miller, CUNY
Computable reductions on groups and fields
Hjorth and Thomas established that the complexity of the isomorphism problem for torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank grows dramatically higher as the rank increases: for each , there is no Borel function that maps each rank- group to a rank- group in such a way that . We say that there is no Borel reduction from isomorphism on to isomorphism on . (From lower to higher rank, in contrast, such a reduction is readily seen.) Fields of transcendence degree over have very similar computability properties to groups in . This being so, we extend their investigations to include the isomorphism relations on the classes of such fields. We show that there do exist reductions (not merely Borel, but actually computable, and moreover functorial) from each to the corresponding , and also from each to (which proves more challenging than it was for the groups!). It remains open whether a theorem analogous to that of Hjorth-Thomas holds for the fields, but we use the notion of countable reductions to show that the fundamental obstacle to a reduction from to is the uncountability of these spaces. This is joint work with Meng-Che 'Turbo' Ho and Julia Knight.
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Set Theory in the United Kingdom, Cambridge, November 18, 2024
Summer School on Topology, dynamics, and logic in interaction, in Cetraro, Italy, September 1-5, 2025
Set theory and topology seminar 05.11.2024 Paweł Krupski
An update on hyperspaces of knots.
will be presented by
Paweł Krupski
Abstract: New properties of the hyperspaces of simple closed curves in the plane or in the 3-space will be presented. In particular, the hyperspace of polygonal knots is a sigma-compact, strongly countable-dimensional ANR which is an infinite-dimensional Cantor manifold. The hyperspace of tame knots is an absolute Borel, strongly infinite-dimensional Cantor manifold. Joint work with Krzysztof Omiljanowski.
Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.
I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
PBN
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.
***
Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Wednesday seminar and other events
This Week in Logic at CUNY
MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Sun Mengzhou, National University of Singapore
The Kaufmann–Clote question on end extensions of models of arithmetic and the weak regularity principle
We investigate the end extendibility of models of arithmetic with restricted elementarity. By utilizing the restricted ultrapower construction in the second-order context, for each and any countable model of , we construct a proper -elementary end extension satisfying , which answers a question by Clote positively. We also give a characterization of countable models of in terms of their end extendibility similar to the case of . Along the proof, we will introduce a new type of regularity principles in arithmetic called the weak regularity principle, which serves as a bridge between the model's end extendibility and the amount of induction or collection it satisfies.
The talk is based on this paper from arxiv:2409.03527.
Monday October 28, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Date: Monday, October 28, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 29, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 30, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday October 30, 2024, 2:00PM NYC Time. NOTE SPECIAL TIME. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Speaker: Bruno Gavranović, Symbolica AI.
Title: Categorical Deep Learning: An Algebraic Theory of Architectures.Date and Time:
- - - - Thursday, Oct 31, 2024 - - - -
6th Saul Kripke Lecture
Abstract: The notion of a borderline case has been thought to be central to our understanding of vagueness. I shall argue that there is no intelligible notion that can play this role and that an alternative framework for understanding vagueness needs to be found.
- - - - Friday, Nov 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, Nov 4, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, November 4, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Logic and discrimination
Abstract: My talk is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood’s ideas in her groundbreaking article ‘The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic’ (1993). Although Plumwood’s paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination at the basis of my analysis, I present Plumwood’s ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how?
- - - - Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Nov 6, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Speaker: David Jaz Myers, NYU Abu Dhabi.
Date and Time: Wednesday November 6, 2024, ZOOM TALK. TIME TBA (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Title: Contextads: Para and Kleisli constructions as wreath products.
Abstract: Given a comonad D on a category C, we can produce a double category whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps are Kleisli maps for D --- this is the Kleisli double category kl(D). Given a monoidal right action & : C x M --> C, we can produce a double category Para(&) whose tight maps are those of C and whose loose maps A -|-> B are pairs (P, f : A & P --> B) of a parameter space P in M and a parameterised map f.
In this talk, we'll see both these as special cases of a general construction: the Ctx construction which takes a *contextad* on a (double) category and produces a new double category. We'll see that this construction is "just" the wreath product of pseudo-monads in Span(Cat). We'll then exploit this observation to find 2-algebraic structure on the Ctx constructions of suitably structured contextads; vastly generalizing the old observation that a colax monoidal comonad has a monoidal Kleisli category.
This is joint work with Matteo Capucci.
- - - - Thursday, Nov 7, 2024 - - - -
Thursday November 7, 2pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 423
Generic dichotomies for Borel homomorphisms for the finite Friedman-Stanley jumps
- - - - Friday, Nov 8, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Geoff Galgon,
Distributivity and Base trees for
For a regular uncountable cardinal, we show that distributivity and base trees for of intermediate height in the cardinal interval exist in certain models. We also show that base trees of height can exist as well as base trees of various heights depending on the spectrum of cardinalities of towers in . These constructions answer questions of V. Fischer, M. Koelbing, and W. Wohofsky in certain models.
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, November 8, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Set theory and topology seminar 31.10.2024 Carlos López Callejas
High dimensional sequential compactness
will be presented by
Carlos López Callejas
Abstract: In this talk, we will explore a multidimensional version of sequential compactness introduced by Kubis and Szeptycki, known as n-sequential compactness (n-sc), where n is a natural number. They demonstrated that this property holds in compact metric spaces and showed that it induces a hierarchy of sequential compactness; that is, for any n, if a space X is (n+1)-sc, then it is also n-sc. The question they pose is whether this hierarchy is strict—specifically, whether for each n, it is possible to construct a space that is n-sc but not (n+1)-sc. In this presentation, we will discuss some recent progress on this question and mention further generalizations of sequential compactness to any countable ordinal.
Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.
I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.
***
Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Set theory and topology seminar 29.10.2024 Francisco Santiago Nieto de la Rosa
A property of Laver forcing parameterized
will be presented by
Francisco Santiago Nieto de la Rosa
Abstract: Recently, Cieslak and Matinez-Celis have studied the Marczewski ideal associated with the Miller-Laver forcing \(m^0\) and \(l^0\). In particular, they considered parameterized versions of such forcings with ideals over omega (I) and considered the Marczewski ideal associated with these forcings \(m^0(I)\) and \(l^0(I)\). They are interested in studying the cofinality of such ideals. It is known that if the Laver forcing associated with I L(I) has the 1 to 1 or constant property, then \(l^0(I)\) has higher formality than the continuum. The mentioned mathematicians proved that for a certain class of ideals I, L(I) has the mentioned property, however they wonder what happens with ideals that do not belong to that class, specifically for Fin x Fin. In this talk we will give an affirmative answer to that question.
Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.
I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.
***
Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Set theory and topology seminar 29.10.2024 Ángel Jareb Navarro Castillo
Determinacy of Filter Games from the Closed-Set Covering Property
will be presented by
Ángel Jareb Navarro Castillo
Abstract: In this talk, we will prove the determinacy of some filter games (for example, \(G(F, \omega, F^∗)\) and \(G(F, [\omega]^{<\omega}, F^+)\)), assuming that the dual ideal satisfies the Closed-Set Covering Property. As corollaries, we obtain that these games are determined for every analytic filter (by a theorem of Solecki) and for every set in the Solovay model (by a theorem of Di Prisco and Todorcevic).
Feel free to spread this information among Your colleagues.
I'm looking forward to seeing You,
on behalf of all the organizers,
Szymon Żeberski
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat in the social room.
***
Our webpages:
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/ (legacy page)
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
KGRC Set Theory talks October 28--October 31
Wednesday seminar + colloquium of the MLTCS department
Logic Seminar at NUS Wed 30 Oct 2024 by Desmond Lau
KGRC Set Theory talk October 24
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Monday October 21, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Elementarity of Subgroups and Complexity of Theories for Profinite Groups
Date: Monday, October 21, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Qua, per se, and other topic-transformative operators
Abstract: Recent work challenging principles of topic transparency in topic-sensitive logics has relied on providing accounts of connectives that are topic-transformative, that is, which non-trivially influence the overall topic assigned to a complex. This leads naturally to the question of what operators in natural language might also act as topic-transformative functions. This talk reviews work in progress studying “qua”, “per se”, and other topic-transformative operators. After discussing ways to analyze these operators, we will emphasize how such analyses are likely to assist in a parallel project of updating Richard Sylvan’s work on relevant containment logic.
Note: This is joint work with Pietro Vigiani (Pisa) and Jitka Kadlečková (Rensselaer).
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 22, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 23, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Oct 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Oct 25, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 25, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
More Borel chromatic numbers
Borel chromatic numbers of definable graphs on Polish spaces have been studied for 25 years, starting with the seminal paper by Kechris, Solecky and Todorcevic. I will talk about some recent results about the consistent separation of uncountable Borel chromatic numbers of some particular graphs and about the Borel chromatic number of graphs related to Turing reducibility.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 25, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Computing away negation using ancients: from existential to Diophantine sentences
Last semester, I discussed geometric methods for decidability over a complete discrete valuation ring (DVR) in equal characteristic, suggesting that these methods could be applied effectively. In this talk, I aim to clarify the computability issues surrounding this topic while at the same time shifting focus to the case of mixed characteristic. Whereas quantifier elimination (QE) results are established for p-adic numbers, the general landscape remains less explored. I will demonstrate that for any existential sentence over a computable ring, we can effectively construct a positive existential (or Diophantine) sentence which is logically equivalent to the original in every excellent Henselian DVR containing the ring. This construction hinges on Resolution of Singularities, which is feasible in characteristic zero.
Furthermore, I will utilize ultraproducts, specifically the protoproduct variant, to show how Diophantine statements over a DVR can be reduced to those over a residue ring. Since the residue ring is Artinian—and in the case of p-adics, even finite—the associated problems become significantly more manageable. However, it is important to note that this approach does not yet yield a general QE result, as it applies only to sentences, not formulas. The challenge lies in the dependence of certain effective bounds on parameters. I will provide insights into how to derive a bound based on a refined notion of complexity within the equational system—beyond simply considering its degree—using ultraproducts. Additionally, I will address a request from the audience in my last talk by demonstrating that this bound is indeed effective.
And somehow it will also require some delving into the theory of Witt vectors and ancient elements, as I will explain.- - - - Monday, Oct 28, 2024 - - - -
MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
Sun Mengzhou, National University of Singapore
The Kaufmann–Clote question on end extensions of models of arithmetic and the weak regularity principle
We investigate the end extendibility of models of arithmetic with restricted elementarity. By utilizing the restricted ultrapower construction in the second-order context, for each and any countable model of , we construct a proper -elementary end extension satisfying , which answers a question by Clote positively. We also give a characterization of countable models of in terms of their end extendibility similar to the case of . Along the proof, we will introduce a new type of regularity principles in arithmetic called the weak regularity principle, which serves as a bridge between the model's end extendibility and the amount of induction or collection it satisfies.
The talk is based on this paper from arxiv:2409.03527.
Monday October 28, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Date: Monday, October 28, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 29, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 30, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday October 30, 2024, 2:00PM NYC Time. NOTE SPECIAL TIME. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky noson@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu for zoom link)
Speaker: Bruno Gavranović, Symbolica AI.
Title: Categorical Deep Learning: An Algebraic Theory of Architectures.Date and Time:
- - - - Thursday, Oct 31, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Nov 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Set theory and topology seminar 22.10.2024 Dominik Bargieła
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room.
https://prac.im.pwr.edu.pl/~settheory
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Logic Seminar at NUS on 23.10.2024 at 17:00 hrs by Ellen Hammatt
57th Nankai Logic Colloquium
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Monday, Oct 14, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday October 13, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
From set theory to combinatorics of simplicial maps
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 15, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 16, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Oct 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Oct 18, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 18, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Hanul Jeon, Cornell University
On a cofinal Reinhardt embedding without Powerset
Reinhardt embedding is an elementary embedding from to itself, whose existence was refuted under the Axiom of Choice by Kunen's famous theorem. There were attempts to get a consistent version of a Reinhardt embedding, and dropping the Axiom of Powerset is one possibility. Richard Matthews showed that proves without Powerset is consistent with a Reinhardt embedding, but the embedding in the Matthews' model does not satisfy the cofinality (i.e., for every set there is such that ). In this talk, I will show from that without Powerset is consistent with a cofinal Reinhardt embedding.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 18, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Brian Wynne, CUNY
Old and new decidability results for theories of Abelian lattice-ordered groups
An Abelian lattice-ordered group (l-group) is an Abelian group with a lattice order that is invariant under translations. Examples include , the set of continuous real-valued functions on a topological space with pointwise operations and order, the spaces, and certain spaces of measures. After surveying some of the known decidability results for various classes of l-groups, I will present new decidability results concerning existentially closed l-groups.
Next Week in Logic at CUNY:
- - - - Monday, Oct 21, 2024 - - - -
Monday October 21, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Elementarity of Subgroups and Complexity of Theories for Profinite Groups
Date: Monday, October 21, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Qua, per se, and other topic-transformative operators
Abstract: Recent work challenging principles of topic transparency in topic-sensitive logics has relied on providing accounts of connectives that are topic-transformative, that is, which non-trivially influence the overall topic assigned to a complex. This leads naturally to the question of what operators in natural language might also act as topic-transformative functions. This talk reviews work in progress studying “qua”, “per se”, and other topic-transformative operators. After discussing ways to analyze these operators, we will emphasize how such analyses are likely to assist in a parallel project of updating Richard Sylvan’s work on relevant containment logic.
Note: This is joint work with Pietro Vigiani (Pisa) and Jitka Kadlečková (Rensselaer).
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 22, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 23, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Oct 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Oct 25, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, October 25, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday October 25, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Computing away negation using ancients: from existential to Diophantine sentences
Last semester, I discussed geometric methods for decidability over a complete discrete valuation ring (DVR) in equal characteristic, suggesting that these methods could be applied effectively. In this talk, I aim to clarify the computability issues surrounding this topic while at the same time shifting focus to the case of mixed characteristic. Whereas quantifier elimination (QE) results are established for p-adic numbers, the general landscape remains less explored. I will demonstrate that for any existential sentence over a computable ring, we can effectively construct a positive existential (or Diophantine) sentence which is logically equivalent to the original in every excellent Henselian DVR containing the ring. This construction hinges on Resolution of Singularities, which is feasible in characteristic zero.
Furthermore, I will utilize ultraproducts, specifically the protoproduct variant, to show how Diophantine statements over a DVR can be reduced to those over a residue ring. Since the residue ring is Artinian—and in the case of p-adics, even finite—the associated problems become significantly more manageable. However, it is important to note that this approach does not yet yield a general QE result, as it applies only to sentences, not formulas. The challenge lies in the dependence of certain effective bounds on parameters. I will provide insights into how to derive a bound based on a refined notion of complexity within the equational system—beyond simply considering its degree—using ultraproducts. Additionally, I will address a request from the audience in my last talk by demonstrating that this bound is indeed effective.
And somehow it will also require some delving into the theory of Witt vectors and ancient elements, as I will explain.- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Wednesday seminar
KGRC Set Theory talk October 17
Set theory and topology seminar 15.10.2024 Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja
Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Logic Seminar Wed 9 Oct 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS
Wednesday seminar
This Week in Logic at CUNY (heads up, no email next week)
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 30, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Extremely amenable automorphism groups of countable structures
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 30, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Daniel West (CUNY)
Title: The disjunction property for operational relevance logics
Abstract: A logic has the disjunction property just in case whenever a disjunction is valid, at least one of its disjuncts is valid. The disjunction property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this talk I present joint work with Yale Weiss in which we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property also holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics. This is a known result in the case of the positive semilattice logic, but the proof is quite different, being proof-theoretic rather than semantic. These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.
Note: This is joint work with Yale Weiss (CUNY).
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 2, 2024 - - - -
NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER
- - - - Thursday, Oct 3, 2024 - - - -
NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER
- - - - Friday, Oct 4, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, Oct 7, 2024 - - - -
Monday October 7, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, October 7, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time), GC 4419
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 8, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 9, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday October 9, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK (contact N Yanofsky for zoom link)
Title: Exodromy.
Abstract: A favorite result of first semester algebraic topology is the “monodromy theorem,” which states that for a suitable topological space X, there is a triple equivalence between the categories of covering spaces of X, sets with an action from the fundamental group of X, and locally constant sheaves on X. This result has recently been upgraded by MacPherson and others to a stratified setting, where the underlying space may be carved into a poset of subspaces. In this talk, we’ll look at the main ingredients of the so-called “exodromy theorem,” reviewing stratified spaces and developing “constructible sheaves” and the “exit-path category” along the way.
- - - - Thursday, Oct 10, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Oct 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
KGRC Set Theory talks September 30 - October 4
Wednesday seminar
Wednesday seminar
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 23, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Countable reductions in computable structure theory
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 23, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Value and freedom
Abstract: In order to decide how good a society is, we need some measure of goodness. And the goodness of a society is typically obtained by somehow summing up the well beings of its members. Various approaches include Utilitarianism and Rawlsianism as well as the Leximin approach suggested by Amartya Sen. But Sen and Nussbaum have suggested that the Capability of an individual, what the individual can do, should be the real measure of well being. Another issue is that of freedom. My freedom can be diminished by some restrictive laws. But it can also be diminished by some handicap, or by certain social methods not being available. How to measure the amount of freedom I have? Is it simply the number of options I have, or does the value of the options also matter? And what is the mathematics of freedom?
Note: An extended abstract is available here.
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday September 25, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK, Room 6417
Title: A formal category theory for oo-T-multicategories.
Abstract: We will explore a framework for oo-T-multicategories. To begin, we build a schema for multicategories out of the simplex schema and the monoid schema. The multicategory schema, D_m, inherits the structure of a monad from the +1 monad on the monoid schema. Simplicial T-multicategories are monad preserving functors out of the multicategory schema, [D_m, T], into another monad T. The framework is larger than just [D_m,T]. A larger structure describes notions of yoneda lemma and fibration. Inner fibrant, simplicial T-multicategories are oo-T-multicategories. oo-T-multicategories generalize oo-categories and oo-operads: oo-operads are fm-multicategories, oo-categories are Id-multicategories.
We use this framework to study oo-fc-multicategories, or "oo - virtual double categories". In general, under various assumptions on T (which hold for fc), the collection of oo-T-multicategories [D_m, T] has other useful structure. One such structure is a join operation. This join operation points towards a synthetic definition of op/cartesian cells, which we hope will model oo-virtual equipments. If there is time, I will explain the motivation for this study as it relates to ontologies, meta-theories and type theories.
- - - - Thursday, Sep 26, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 27, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time, Room 3207
Hybrid: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Takashi Yamazoe, Kobe University
Cichoń's maximum with the uniformity and the covering of the -ideal generated by closed null sets
Let denote the -ideal generated by closed null sets on . We show that the uniformity and the covering of can be added to Cichoń's maximum with distinct values, more specifically, it is consistent that holds.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 27, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Victoria Gitman, CUNY
Baby measurable cardinals
Measurable cardinals and other large cardinals on the larger side of things are characterized by the existence of elementary embeddings from the universe of sets into a transitive submodel . The clear pattern the large cardinals in that region follow is that the closer the submodel is to the stronger the large cardinal notion. Smaller large cardinals, such as weakly compact or Ramsey cardinals, are known chiefly for their combinatorial properties, such as the existence of large homogeneous sets for colorings. But, it turns out that they too have elementary embeddings characterizations with embeddings on the correspondingly small models of (a fragment) of set theory (usually , the theory with powerset axiom removed). Elementary embeddings of are often by-definable with the existence of certain ultrafilters or systems of ultrafilters. The classical example is that is measurable if and only if there is a -complete ultrafilter on . The model is then the transitive collapse of the ultrapower of by . The connection between elementary embedding and ultrafilters also exists in the case of the small elementary embeddings. A typical elementary embedding characterization of a small large cardinal follows the following template: for every , there is a (technical condition) model , with , for which there is an -ultrafilter on with (technical properties). A subset is an -ultrafilter if the structure , with a predicate for , satisfies that is a -complete ultrafilter on , meaning that measures all the sets in and its completeness applies to sequences that are elements of . The reason we need to add a predicate for is that in most interesting case, and in contrast to the situation with measurable cardinals, is not an element of (indeed in most cases, does not exist in ). While the structure usually satisfies some large fragment of , once, we add a predicate for the -ultrafilter , the structure can fail to satisfy even -separation. In this talk, I will discuss how smaller large cardinals follow the pattern that the more set theory the structure satisfies the stronger the resulting large cardinal notion. I will use these observations to introduce a new hierarchy of large cardinals between Ramsey and measurable cardinals. This is joint work with Philipp Schlicht, based on earlier work by Bovykin and McKenzie.
- - - - Monday, Sep 30, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 30, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Extremely amenable automorphism groups of countable structures
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 30, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Daniel West (CUNY)
Title: The disjunction property for operational relevance logics
Abstract: A logic has the disjunction property just in case whenever a disjunction is valid, at least one of its disjuncts is valid. The disjunction property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this talk I present joint work with Yale Weiss in which we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property also holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics. This is a known result in the case of the positive semilattice logic, but the proof is quite different, being proof-theoretic rather than semantic. These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.
Note: This is joint work with Yale Weiss (CUNY).
- - - - Tuesday, Oct 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Oct 2, 2024 - - - -
NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER
- - - - Thursday, Oct 3, 2024 - - - -
NO CLASSES SCHEDULED - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER
- - - - Friday, Oct 4, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 16, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Maxwell Levine, University of Freiburg
Namba Forcing, Minimality, and Approximations
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 16, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Mel Fitting (CUNY)
Title: Simple tableaus for simple logics
Abstract: Consider those many-valued logic models in which the truth values are a lattice that supplies interpretations for the logical connectives of conjunction and disjunction, and which has a De Morgan involution supplying an interpretation for negation. Assume the set of designated truth values is a prime filter in the lattice. Each of these structures determines a simple many-valued logic. We show there is a single Smullyan style signed tableau system appropriate for all of the logics these structures determine. Differences between the logics are confined entirely to tableau branch closure rules. Completeness, soundness, and interpolation can be proved in a uniform way for all cases. Since branch closure rules have a limited number of variations, in fact all the semantic structures determine just four different logics, all well-known ones. Asymmetric logics such as strict/tolerant, ST, also share all the same tableau rules, but differ in what constitutes an initial tableau. It is also possible to capture the notion of anti-validity using the same set of tableau rules. Thus a simple set of tableau rules serves as a unifying and classifying device for a natural and simple family of many-valued logics.
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 18, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday September 18, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK, Room 6417
- - - - Friday, Sep 20, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, Sep 23, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Countable reductions in computable structure theory
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 23, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Title: Value and freedom
Abstract: In order to decide how good a society is, we need some measure of goodness. And the goodness of a society is typically obtained by somehow summing up the well beings of its members. Various approaches include Utilitarianism and Rawlsianism as well as the Leximin approach suggested by Amartya Sen. But Sen and Nussbaum have suggested that the Capability of an individual, what the individual can do, should be the real measure of well being. Another issue is that of freedom. My freedom can be diminished by some restrictive laws. But it can also be diminished by some handicap, or by certain social methods not being available. How to measure the amount of freedom I have? Is it simply the number of options I have, or does the value of the options also matter? And what is the mathematics of freedom?
Note: An extended abstract is available here.
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday September 25, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK, Room 6417
Title: A formal category theory for oo-T-multicategories.
Abstract: We will explore a framework for oo-T-multicategories. To begin, we build a schema for multicategories out of the simplex schema and the monoid schema. The multicategory schema, D_m, inherits the structure of a monad from the +1 monad on the monoid schema. Simplicial T-multicategories are monad preserving functors out of the multicategory schema, [D_m, T], into another monad T. The framework is larger than just [D_m,T]. A larger structure describes notions of yoneda lemma and fibration. Inner fibrant, simplicial T-multicategories are oo-T-multicategories. oo-T-multicategories generalize oo-categories and oo-operads: oo-operads are fm-multicategories, oo-categories are Id-multicategories.
We use this framework to study oo-fc-multicategories, or "oo - virtual double categories". In general, under various assumptions on T (which hold for fc), the collection of oo-T-multicategories [D_m, T] has other useful structure. One such structure is a join operation. This join operation points towards a synthetic definition of op/cartesian cells, which we hope will model oo-virtual equipments. If there is time, I will explain the motivation for this study as it relates to ontologies, meta-theories and type theories.
- - - - Thursday, Sep 26, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 27, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 27, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Logic Seminar 18 September 2024 16:45 hrs at NUS by Le Quy Thuong
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*. In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories. (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals. The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields
Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.
- - - - Monday, Sep 16, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm, Rutgers University, Hill Center, Hill 705
Maxwell Levine, University of Freiburg
Namba Forcing, Minimality, and Approximations
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday,September 16, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Mel Fitting (CUNY)
Title: Simple tableaus for simple logics
Abstract: Consider those many-valued logic models in which the truth values are a lattice that supplies interpretations for the logical connectives of conjunction and disjunction, and which has a De Morgan involution supplying an interpretation for negation. Assume the set of designated truth values is a prime filter in the lattice. Each of these structures determines a simple many-valued logic. We show there is a single Smullyan style signed tableau system appropriate for all of the logics these structures determine. Differences between the logics are confined entirely to tableau branch closure rules. Completeness, soundness, and interpolation can be proved in a uniform way for all cases. Since branch closure rules have a limited number of variations, in fact all the semantic structures determine just four different logics, all well-known ones. Asymmetric logics such as strict/tolerant, ST, also share all the same tableau rules, but differ in what constitutes an initial tableau. It is also possible to capture the notion of anti-validity using the same set of tableau rules. Thus a simple set of tableau rules serves as a unifying and classifying device for a natural and simple family of many-valued logics.
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 18, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
Date and Time: Wednesday September 18, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON TALK
Room 5417 (not the usual Room 6417)
- - - - Friday, Sep 20, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
UPDATE: This Week in Logic - today's Logic Workshop is in GC 4419
- - - - Thursday, Sep 05, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 06, 2024 - - - -
Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Reflecting Ordinals and Forcing
Let and either or . An ordinal is called -reflecting if for each and each -formula if then there is a so that where here refers to full second order logic. The least -reflecting ordinal is called and the least -ordinal is called . These ordinals provably exist and are countable (for all ). They arise naturally in proof theory, particularly in calibrating consistency strength of strong arithmetics and weak set theories. Moreover, surprisingly, their relation to one another relies heavily on the background set theory. If then for all we have (due to Cutland) while under PD for all we have if and only if is even (due to Kechris).
Surprisingly nothing was known about these ordinals in any model which satisfies neither nor PD. In this talk I will sketch some recent results which aim at rectifying this. In particular we will show that in any generic extension by any number of Cohen or Random reals, a Sacks, Miller or Laver real, or any lightface, weakly homogeneous Borel ccc forcing notion agrees with about which ordinals are -reflecting (for any and ). Meanwhile, in the generic extension by collapsing many interesting things happen, not least amongst them that and are increased - yet still below for . Along the way we will discuss the plethora of open problems in this area. This is joint work with Juan Aguilera.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 6, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces
(One version of) Cantor's second best theorem states that every pair of countable, dense sets of reals are isomorphic as linear orders. From the perspective of set theory it's natural to ask whether some variant of this theorem can hold consistently when 'countable' is replaced by 'uncountable'. This was shown in the affirmative by Baumgartner in 1973 who showed the consistency of 'all -dense sets of reals are order isomorphic' where a set is -dense for a cardinal if its intersection with any open interval has size . The above became known as Baumgartner's axiom, denoted BA, and is an important axiom in both combinatorial set theory and set theoretic topology. BA has natural higher dimensional analogues - i.e., statements with the same relation to that BA has to . It is a long standing open conjecture of Steprāns and Watson that BA implies its higher dimensional analogues.
In the talk I will describe some attempts to break the ice on this open problem mostly by looking at a family of weaker and stronger variants of BA and investigating their combinatorial, analytic and topological consequences. We will show that while some weak variants of BA have all the same consequences as BA, even weaker ones do not. Meanwhile a strengthening of BA for Baire and Polish space gives much more information.
Next Week in Logic at CUNY:
- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*. In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories. (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals. The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 4419
David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields
Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Logic Seminar 11 September 2024 17:00 hrs by Kihara Takayuki at NUS
Wednesday seminar
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Thursday, Sep 05, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 06, 2024 - - - -
Set Theory Seminar
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, September 6, 11:00am NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for zoom info.
Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Reflecting Ordinals and Forcing
Let and either or . An ordinal is called -reflecting if for each and each -formula if then there is a so that where here refers to full second order logic. The least -reflecting ordinal is called and the least -ordinal is called . These ordinals provably exist and are countable (for all ). They arise naturally in proof theory, particularly in calibrating consistency strength of strong arithmetics and weak set theories. Moreover, surprisingly, their relation to one another relies heavily on the background set theory. If then for all we have (due to Cutland) while under PD for all we have if and only if is even (due to Kechris).
Surprisingly nothing was known about these ordinals in any model which satisfies neither nor PD. In this talk I will sketch some recent results which aim at rectifying this. In particular we will show that in any generic extension by any number of Cohen or Random reals, a Sacks, Miller or Laver real, or any lightface, weakly homogeneous Borel ccc forcing notion agrees with about which ordinals are -reflecting (for any and ). Meanwhile, in the generic extension by collapsing many interesting things happen, not least amongst them that and are increased - yet still below for . Along the way we will discuss the plethora of open problems in this area. This is joint work with Juan Aguilera.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 6, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 6417 (NOTICE THE CHANGE! BACK TO OUR PRE-2023 ROOM)
Corey Switzer, Kurt Gödel Research Center
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces
(One version of) Cantor's second best theorem states that every pair of countable, dense sets of reals are isomorphic as linear orders. From the perspective of set theory it's natural to ask whether some variant of this theorem can hold consistently when 'countable' is replaced by 'uncountable'. This was shown in the affirmative by Baumgartner in 1973 who showed the consistency of 'all -dense sets of reals are order isomorphic' where a set is -dense for a cardinal if its intersection with any open interval has size . The above became known as Baumgartner's axiom, denoted BA, and is an important axiom in both combinatorial set theory and set theoretic topology. BA has natural higher dimensional analogues - i.e., statements with the same relation to that BA has to . It is a long standing open conjecture of Steprāns and Watson that BA implies its higher dimensional analogues.
In the talk I will describe some attempts to break the ice on this open problem mostly by looking at a family of weaker and stronger variants of BA and investigating their combinatorial, analytic and topological consequences. We will show that while some weak variants of BA have all the same consequences as BA, even weaker ones do not. Meanwhile a strengthening of BA for Baire and Polish space gives much more information.
Next Week in Logic at CUNY:
- - - - Monday, Sep 9, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday September 9, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Corey Switzer, KGRC
Weak and Strong Variants of Baumgartner's Axiom for Polish Spaces
Date: Monday,September 9, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 4419
Speaker: Hartry Field (NYU)
Title: Well-behaved truth
Abstract: Common-sense reasoning with truth involves both the use of classical logic and the assumption of the transparency of truth (the equivalence between a sentence and the attribution of truth to it). The semantic paradoxes show that at least one of these must go, and different theorists make different choices. But whatever one’s choice, it’s valuable to carve out one or more domains where both classical logic and transparency can be assumed; domains where everything is *well-behaved*. In this talk I’ll explore a method of adding a predicate of well-behavedness to various truth theories, which works for both classical and nonclassical theories (including non-classical theories with special conditionals). With such a predicate, one can reason more easily, and formulate and prove generalizations that are unavailable without such a predicate. Besides their intrinsic interest, these generalizations greatly increase the proof-theoretic strength of axiomatic theories. (There are some previous proposals for adding a well-behavedness predicate to specific classical theories, and others for adding one to non-classical theories without special conditionals. The current proposal, besides being general, is also more satisfactory in the individual cases, and is the only one I know of for non-classical theories with conditionals.)
- - - - Tuesday, Sep 10, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Sep 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Sep 12, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Sep 13, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday September 13, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 6417 (NOTICE THE CHANGE! BACK TO OUR PRE-2023 ROOM)
David Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields
Shelah showed that it is consistent that there are uncountable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields and, later, he and Mekler proved this in . Answering a question of Enayat, Charlie Steinhorn and I show that there are countable rigid non-archimedean real closed fields by constructing one of transcendence degree two.
- - - - Other Logic News - - - -
- - - - Web Site - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Location change -- Wednesday seminar -- Macpherson
Wednesday seminar -- Macpherson
Logic Seminar 28 August 2024 17:00 hrs by Linus Richter, NUS
Logic Seminar at NUS on 21 Aug 2024 17:00 hrs by Vo Ngoc Thieu
KGRC talk August 16
Logic Seminar 7 August 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS by Zhang Jing
Logic Seminar 31 July 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS by George Barmpalias, CAS
Kyoto University RIMS Set Theory Workshop, October 9-11, 2024
Wednesday seminar
Set theory and topology seminar 25.06.2024 everybody
I am happy to announce that the last seminar this semester in Set Theory and Topology (on Thuesday 25.06.2024 at 17:15) will take place in
"Forma Płynna Beach Bar"
Plaża miejska, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego.
Every participant is the speaker.
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
Wednesday seminar
Set theory and topology seminar 18.06.2024 Aleksander Cieślak
Aleksander Cieślak
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Wednesday seminar
KGRC talk June 20
56th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium will be in the afternoon.
Our speaker this week will be Lionel Nguyen Van The from Aix-Marseille University. This talk will take place this Friday, June 14th, from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time).
Abstract:
Structural Ramsey theory appeared naturally as a branch of Ramsey theory in the seventies, and is concerned with partition properties of combinatorial objects that are equipped with some structure (typically, in the sense of first order logic). While several seminal results were proved in those years, the subject was offered an unexpected revival thirty years later, whose consequences are still being felt today. This talk will be an attempt to describe the main lines of thought behind this story, starting from the pioneering work of Graham, Leeb, Nesetril, Rödl, Rothschild, Spencer and Voigt, continuing with that of Kechris, Pestov and Todorcevic, and finishing with that of Dobrinen.
This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
Set theory and topology seminar 11.06.2024 Jadwiga Świerczyńska
Jadwiga Świerczyńska
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
KGRC talks June 11 -13
55th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium will be in the afternoon.
Our speaker this week will be Rizos Sklinos from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This talk will take place this Friday, June 7th, from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time).
This is going to be an online/offline hybrid event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Time :16:00pm, Jun. 7, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 436 658 8683
Passcode :477893
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
Wednesday seminar
Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Lorenz Halbeisen)
The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.
All the best,
Vincenzo
Wednesday seminar
Set theory and topology seminar 4.06.2024 Andres Uribe-Zapata (TU Wien)
Andres Uribe-Zapata (TU Wien)
In this talk, we present an integration theory with respect to finitely additive measures on a field of sets $\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal(X)$ for some non-empty set $X$. For this, we start by reviewing some fundamental properties of finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras. Later, we present a definition of the integral in this context and some basic properties of the integral and the integrability. We also study integration over subsets of $X$ to introduce the Jordan algebra and compare the integration on this new algebra with the integration on $\mathcal{B}$. Finally, we say that a finitely additive measure on $\mathcal{B}$ is \emph{free} if $\mathcal{B}$ contains any finite subset of $X$ and its measure is zero. We close the talk by providing some characterizations of free finitely additive measures.
This is a joint work with Miguel A. Cardona and Diego A. Mejía.
References:
[CMU] Miguel A. Cardona, Diego A. Mejía and Andrés F. Uribe-Zapata. Finitely additive measures on Boolean algebras. In Preparation.
[UZ23] Andrés Uribe-Zapata. Iterated forcing with finitely additive measures: applications of probability to forcing theory. Master’s thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín, 2023. https://shorturl.at/sHY59.
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
KGRC Talk - June 6
54th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.
Our speaker this week will be Andre Nies from the University of Auckland. This talk is going to take place this Friday, May 31, from 4pm to 5pm (UTC+8, Beijing time).
This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Title :The 54th Nankai Logic Colloquium-- Andre Nies
Time :16:00pm, May. 31, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 436 658 8683
Passcode :477893
Link :https://frontai-hk.zoom.us/j/4366588683?pwd=ob0TsLuLeIl0JT7403RaqvFKgOnuRf.1&omn=82728819387
_____________________________________________________________________
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Mirna Džamonja)
The Cross-Alps Logic Seminar is co-organized by the logic groups of Genoa, Lausanne, Turin and Udine as part of our collaboration in the project PRIN 2022 'Models, Sets and Classifications'.
All the best,
Vincenzo
Wednesday seminar
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Emilio Minichiello , The CUNY Graduate Center.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 22, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN PERSON TALK!
Title: Presenting Profunctors.
Abstract: In categorical database theory, profunctors are ubiquitous. For example, they are used to define schemas in the algebraic data model. However, they can also be used to query and migrate data. In this talk, we will discuss an interesting phenomenon that arises when trying to model profunctors in a computer. We will introduce two notions of profunctor presentations: the UnCurried and Curried presentations. They are modeled on thinking of profunctors as functors P: C^op x D -> Set and as functors P: C^op -> Set^D, respectively. Semantically of course, these are equivalent, but their syntactic properties are quite different. The UnCurried presentations are more intuitive and easier to work with, but they carry a fatal flaw: there does not exist a semantics-preserving composition operation of UnCurried presentations that also preserves finiteness. Therefore we introduce the Curried presentations and show that they remedy this flaw. In the process, we characterize which UnCurried Presentations can be made Curried, and discuss some applications. This talk will be based off of this recent preprint which is joint work with Gabriel Goren Roig and Joshua Meyers.
- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, May 27, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Tuesday, May 28, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 29, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 30, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 31, 2024 - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
KGRC Talks - May 24
Wednesday seminar
53rd Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon, but at an irregular time, as we have two speakers this week.
_____________________________________________________________________
The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893.
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY
Hi everyone,
- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -
Tuesday, May 14, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Abstract: All my working life as a logician epistemic logic came with Kripke models, in particular the kind for multiple agents with equivalence relations to interpret knowledge. Sure enough, I knew about enriched Kripke models, like subset spaces, or with topologies. But at some level of abstraction you get back your standard Kripke model. Imagine my surprise, around 2018, that there is an entirely dual sort of structure on which the epistemic logical language can be interpreted and that results in the same S5 logic: simplicial complexes. Instead of points that are worlds and links labeled with agents, we now have points that are agents and links labeled with worlds. Or, instead of edges (links), triangles, tetrahedrons, etcetera, that represent worlds. Simplicial complexes are well-known within combinatorial topology and have wide usage in distributed systems to model (a)synchronous computation. The link with epistemic modal logic is recent, spreading out from Mexico City and Paris to other parts of the world, like Vienna and Bern. Other logics are relevant too, for example KB4, in order to encode crashed processes/agents. Other epistemics are relevant too, and in particular distributed knowledge, which facilitates further generalizations from simplicial complexes to simplicial sets. It will be my pleasure to present my infatuation with this novel development connecting epistemic logic and distributed computing. Suggested introductory reading is:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08863
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_1
Knowledge and Simplicial Complexes
Hans van Ditmarsch, Eric Goubault, Jeremy Ledent, Sergio Rajsbaum
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.7.34
Epistemic and Topological Reasoning in Distributed Systems (Dagstuhl Seminar 23272)
Armando Castañeda, Hans van Ditmarsch, Roman Kuznets, Yoram Moses, Ulrich Schmid
Section 4.3 Representing Epistemic Attitudes via Simplicial Complexes
- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Raymond Puzio.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 15, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON!
Title: Uniqueness of Classical Retrodiction.
Abstract: In previous talks at this Category seminar and at the Topology, Geometry and Physics seminar, Arthur Parzygnat showed how Bayesian inversion and its generalization to quantum mechanics may be interpreted as a functor on a suitable category of states which satisfies certain axioms. Such a functor is called a retrodiction and Parzygnat and collaborators conjectured that retrodiction is unique. In this talk, I will present a proof of this conjecture for the special case of classical probability theory on finite state spaces.
In this special case, the category in question has non-degenerate probability distributions on finite sets as its objects and stochastic matrices as its morphisms. After preliminary definitions and lemmas, the proof proceeds in three main steps.
In the first step, we focus on certain groups of automorphisms of certain objects. As a consequence of the axioms, it follows that these groups are preserved under any retrodiction functor and that the restriction of the functor to such a group is a certain kind of group automorphism. Since this group is isomorphic to a Lie group, it is easy to prove that the restriction of a retrodiction to such a group must equal Bayesian inversion if we assume continuity. If we do not make that assumption, we need to work harder and derive continuity "from scratch" starting from the positivity condition in the definition of stochastic matrix.
In the second step, we broaden our attention to the full automorphism groups of objects of our category corresponding to uniform distributions. We show that these groups are generated by the union of the subgroup consisting of permutation matrices and the subgroup considered in the first step. From this fact, it follows that the restriction of a retrodiction to this larger group must equal Bayesian inversion.
In the third step, we finally consider all the objects and morphisms of our category. As a consequence of what we have shown in the first two steps and some preliminary lemmas, it follows that retrodiction is given by matrix conjugation. Furthermore, Bayesian inversion is the special case where the conjugating matrices are diagonal matrices. Because the hom sets of our category are convex polytopes and a retrodiction functor is a continuous bijection of such sets, a retodiction must map polytope faces to faces. By an algebraic argument, this fact implies that the conjugating matrices are diagonal, answering the conjecture in the affirmative.
Paper.
- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -
*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***
- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, May 20, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Emilio Minichiello , The CUNY Graduate Center.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 22, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN PERSON TALK!
Title: Presenting Profunctors.
Abstract: In categorical database theory, profunctors are ubiquitous. For example, they are used to define schemas in the algebraic data model. However, they can also be used to query and migrate data. In this talk, we will discuss an interesting phenomenon that arises when trying to model profunctors in a computer. We will introduce two notions of profunctor presentations: the UnCurried and Curried presentations. They are modeled on thinking of profunctors as functors P: C^op x D -> Set and as functors P: C^op -> Set^D, respectively. Semantically of course, these are equivalent, but their syntactic properties are quite different. The UnCurried presentations are more intuitive and easier to work with, but they carry a fatal flaw: there does not exist a semantics-preserving composition operation of UnCurried presentations that also preserves finiteness. Therefore we introduce the Curried presentations and show that they remedy this flaw. In the process, we characterize which UnCurried Presentations can be made Curried, and discuss some applications. This talk will be based off of this recent preprint which is joint work with Gabriel Goren Roig and Joshua Meyers.
- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
This Week in Logic at CUNY
- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -
Tuesday, May 14, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Abstract: All my working life as a logician epistemic logic came with Kripke models, in particular the kind for multiple agents with equivalence relations to interpret knowledge. Sure enough, I knew about enriched Kripke models, like subset spaces, or with topologies. But at some level of abstraction you get back your standard Kripke model. Imagine my surprise, around 2018, that there is an entirely dual sort of structure on which the epistemic logical language can be interpreted and that results in the same S5 logic: simplicial complexes. Instead of points that are worlds and links labeled with agents, we now have points that are agents and links labeled with worlds. Or, instead of edges (links), triangles, tetrahedrons, etcetera, that represent worlds. Simplicial complexes are well-known within combinatorial topology and have wide usage in distributed systems to model (a)synchronous computation. The link with epistemic modal logic is recent, spreading out from Mexico City and Paris to other parts of the world, like Vienna and Bern. Other logics are relevant too, for example KB4, in order to encode crashed processes/agents. Other epistemics are relevant too, and in particular distributed knowledge, which facilitates further generalizations from simplicial complexes to simplicial sets. It will be my pleasure to present my infatuation with this novel development connecting epistemic logic and distributed computing. Suggested introductory reading is:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08863
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-75267-5_1
Knowledge and Simplicial Complexes
Hans van Ditmarsch, Eric Goubault, Jeremy Ledent, Sergio Rajsbaum
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.7.34
Epistemic and Topological Reasoning in Distributed Systems (Dagstuhl Seminar 23272)
Armando Castañeda, Hans van Ditmarsch, Roman Kuznets, Yoram Moses, Ulrich Schmid
Section 4.3 Representing Epistemic Attitudes via Simplicial Complexes
- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -
*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***
- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, May 20, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 22, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 23, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 24, 2024 - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
120 Years of Choice, Leeds, 8–12 July 2024
Set Theory in the United Kingdom, Oxford, 16 May 2024
Wednesday seminar
KGRC Set Theory Talks - May 12-17
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth
Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.
Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).
- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id)
Ali Enayat, University of Gothenburg
Tarski's undefinability of truth theorem strikes again
Tarski's undefinability of truth theorem has two versions, the first one deals with truth itself, takes some effort to prove, and is a descendant of the Epimenides (liar) paradox. The second one deals with the related concept of satisfaction, has a one-line proof, and is a descendent of Russell's paradox. This talk is about the first one, which appeared in the 1953 monograph 'Undecidable Theories' by Tarski, Mostowski, and Robinson; it was employed there to show the essential undecidability of consistent theories that can represent all recursive functions (a strong form of the Gödel-Rosser incompleteness theorem). I will present Tarski's original 1953 formulation (which differs from the common formulation in modern expositions) and will explain how it was used in my recent work with Albert Visser to show that no consistent completion of a sequential theory whose signature is finite is axiomatizable by a collection of sentences of bounded quantifier-alternation-depth. A variant of this result was proved independently by Emil Jeřábek, as I will explain. Our proof method has a pedagogical dividend since it allows one to replace the cryptic Gödel-Carnap fixed point lemma with the perspicuous undefinability of truth theorem in the proof of the Gödel-Rosser incompleteness theorem.
Tuesday, May 7, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Speaker: SREEHARI KALLOORMANA, Graduate Center CUNY
Title: Formal Argumentation Theory and Argumentation Logics.
Abstract: Deductive Logic is monotonic, in that when the set of premises grows, the set of conclusions grows as well. Since the 1980s, Non-monotonic Logics, where this does not hold, have been studied to model commonsense reasoning, especially in the field of artificial intelligence. In this talk, we will be looking at argument-based nonmonotonic logics, which formalize the notion of attack and defeat in the field of argumentation theory. We will consider briefly abstract argumentation frameworks and the various semantic notions proposed by P.M. Dung in 1995, followed by logic-based structured argumentation frameworks `a la John Pollock, and the more recent ASPIC framework. Various notions of argument attack/defeat fundamental to argumentation, such as rebuttal, undercutting, and undermining, will be discussed. We will then introduce and discuss the idea of reasoning about argumentation using Justification logic, by introducing priority orderings over formulas and justification terms.
- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.
Title: Canonical squares in fully faithful and absolutely dense equipments.
Abstract: Equipments are categorical structures of dimension 2 having two separate types of 1-arrows -vertical and horizontal- and supporting restriction and extension of horizontal arrows along vertical ones. Equipments were defined by Wood in [W] as 2-functors satisfying certain conditions, but can also be understood as double categories satisfying a fibrancy condition as in [Sh]. In the zoo of 2-dimensional categorical structures, equipments nicely fit in between 2-categories and double categories, and are generally considered as the 2-dimensional categorical structures where synthetic category theory is done, and in some cases, where monoidal bicategories are more naturally defined.
In a previous talk in the seminar, I discussed the problem of lifting a 2-category into a double category along a given category of vertical arrows, and how this problem allows us to define a notion of length on double categories. The length of a double category is a number that roughly measures the amount of work one needs to do to reconstruct the double category from a bicategory along its set of vertical arrows.
In this talk I will review the length of double categories, and I will discuss two recent developments in the theory: In the paper [OM] a method for constructing different double categories from a given bicategory is presented. I will explain how this construction works. One of the main ingredients of the construction are so-called canonical squares. In the preprint [O] it is proven that in certain classes of equipments -fully faithful and absolutely dense- every square that can be canonical is indeed canonical. I will explain how from this, it can be concluded that fully faithful and absolutely dense equipments are of length 1, and so they can be 'easily' reconstructed from their horizontal bicategories.
References:
[O] Length of fully faithful framed bicategories. arXiv:2402.16296.
[OM] J. Orendain, R. Maldonado-Herrera, Internalizations of decorated bicategories via π-indexings. To appear in Applied Categorical Structures. arXiv:2310.18673.
[W] R. K. Wood, Abstract Proarrows I, Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle 23 3 (1982) 279-290.
[Sh] M. Shulman, Framed bicategories and monoidal fibrations. Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 20, No. 18, 2008, pp. 650–738.
- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495
Alf Dolich, CUNY
The decidability of the rings Z/mZ
In this expository talk I will discuss recent work of Derakhshan and Macintyre on the decidability of the common theory of the rings Z/mZ as m varies through the natural numbers m>1.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic
The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.
Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.
- - - - Monday, May 13, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 15, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 16, 2024 - - - -
*** FINAL EXAMS WEEK BEGINS - CUNY GRADUATE CENTER ***
- - - - Friday, May 17, 2024 - - - -
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Logic Seminar 8 May 2024 17:00 hrs at NUS
Fwd: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory
Od: Grzegorz Plebanek <grzegorz.plebanek@math.uni.wroc.pl>
Date: wt., 30 kwi 2024 o 22:47
Subject: Fwd: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory
To: Szymon Żeberski <szymon.zeberski@pwr.edu.pl>
Cc: <sebastian.jachimek@math.uni.wroc.pl>, Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja <pborod@math.uni.wroc.pl>
Szymonie, rozeslij to, proszę do wszystkich z seminarium. To Jest wiadomość od Tomka Kanii (który prosi o informowanie wszystkich zainteresowanych) w sprawie sesji Przestrzenie Banacha, ale na liście konferencji jest też sesja Teoria Mnogości. Pozdrawiam, G
Od: Tomasz Kania <tomasz2.kania@uj.edu.pl>
Date: wt., 30 kwi 2024 o 21:10
Subject: 9 FMP: przestrzenie Banacha: geometria i operatory
okazuje się, że sesja z przestrzeni Banacha się odbędzie (nie jest jednak jeszcze jasne, którego dnia konferencji); jeżeli nadal wyrażasz zainteresowanie przyjazdem, bardzo proszę o przesłanie abstraktu na:
Abstrakty - 9. Forum Matematyków Polskich (us.edu.pl)
(oraz idealnie potwierdzenie emailowe do mnie, że udało Ci się posłać).
Set Theory Workshop "Compactness and Cardinal Invariants" Vienna, May 2, 2024
UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 29, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap
Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -
Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, April 30
Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM (EDT)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov sartemov@gmail.com
Speaker: Benjamin PrudHomme, Graduate Center CUNY
Title: On Game Theory and Epistemic Logic
Abstract: Review of basic game theory and epistemic game theory concepts, including strictly competitive games, pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria, rationalizability, models of knowledge, distinction between mutual and common knowledge. Review of proofs of when a game has a Nash equilibrium, Nash's Theorem, Muddy Children Problem. Discussions of current and potential future efforts to utilize logic in developing a more comprehensive theory of pure strategy solutions.
- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495
Genericity in models of arithmetic
In this talk, I plan to explore a few notions of 'genericity' in the context of models of arithmetic. I will recall the notion of genericity borrowed from set-theory, used by Simpson to prove that every countable model of PA has an expansion to a pointwise definable model of PA*. I will then explore other notions of genericity inspired by more model-theoretic contexts. One such notion is 'neutrality': in a model M, we say an undefinable set X is neutral if the definable closure relation in (M, X) is the same as in M. Another notion, inspired by work done on model-theoretic genericity by Chatzidakis and Pillay, is called CP-genericity. I will explore these notions and outline some results, including: (1) every model of PA has a neutral set which is not CP-generic, (2) every countable model of PA has a CP-generic which is not neutral (and in fact, fails neutrality spectacularly: ie, we can find a CP-generic where the expansion is pointwise definable), and (3) every countable model of PA has a neutral CP-generic. This talk touches on work contained in two papers, one of which was joint work with Roman Kossak, and the other was joint work with James Schmerl.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing
We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type
In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy and topological pressure on compact shift spaces and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function is not computable for a large set of shift spaces and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).
- - - - Monday, May 6, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth
Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.
Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).
- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.
Title: Canonical squares in regularly framed bicategories.
- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic
The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.
Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Spencer Unger)
Spencer Unger (University of Toronto)
will give a talk on
Iterated ultrapower methods
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 29, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap
Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 12:30pm NY time, Room: 6495
Genericity in models of arithmetic
In this talk, I plan to explore a few notions of 'genericity' in the context of models of arithmetic. I will recall the notion of genericity borrowed from set-theory, used by Simpson to prove that every countable model of PA has an expansion to a pointwise definable model of PA*. I will then explore other notions of genericity inspired by more model-theoretic contexts. One such notion is 'neutrality': in a model M, we say an undefinable set X is neutral if the definable closure relation in (M, X) is the same as in M. Another notion, inspired by work done on model-theoretic genericity by Chatzidakis and Pillay, is called CP-genericity. I will explore these notions and outline some results, including: (1) every model of PA has a neutral set which is not CP-generic, (2) every countable model of PA has a CP-generic which is not neutral (and in fact, fails neutrality spectacularly: ie, we can find a CP-generic where the expansion is pointwise definable), and (3) every countable model of PA has a neutral CP-generic. This talk touches on work contained in two papers, one of which was joint work with Roman Kossak, and the other was joint work with James Schmerl.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing
We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type
In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy and topological pressure on compact shift spaces and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function is not computable for a large set of shift spaces and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).
- - - - Monday, May 6, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, May 6, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Alethic pluralism and Kripkean truth
Abstract: According to alethic pluralism, there is more than one way of being true: truth is not unique, in that there is a plurality of truth properties each of which pertains to a specific domain of discourse. This paper shows how such a plurality can be represented in a coherent formal framework by means of a Kripke-style construction that yields intuitively correct extensions for distinct truth predicates. The theory of truth it develops can handle at least three crucial problems that have been raised in connection with alethic pluralism: mixed compounds, mixed inferences, and semantic paradoxes.
Note: This is joint work with Andrea Iacona (Turin) and Stefano Romeo (Turin).
- - - - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 8, 2024 - - - -
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Juan Orendain, Case Western Univeristy.
Date and Time: Wednesday May 8, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. ZOOM TALK.
Title: Canonical squares in regularly framed bicategories.
- - - - Thursday, May 9, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 10, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 10, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of arithmetic
The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N.
Since the 1970's, the problem generated much research with highly nontrivial results with proofs combining specific methods in the model theory of arithmetic with lattice theory and various combinatorial theorems. The problem has a definite answer in the case of distributive lattices, and, despite much effort, there are still many open questions in the nondistributive case. I will briefly survey some early results and present a few proofs that illustrate the difference between the distributive and nondistributive cases.
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
KGRC Set Theory Talk - May 2
Wednesday seminar
51st Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.
Our speaker this week will be Jiachen Yuan from the University of Leeds. This talk is going to take place this Friday, Apr 26, from 4pm to 5pm(UTC+8, Beijing time).
This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Title :The 51st Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Jiachen Yuan
Time :16:00pm, Apr. 26, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 734 242 5443
Passcode :477893
Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=84627872662
_____________________________________________________________________
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
This Week in Logic at CUNY
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
Monday Apr 22, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Dave Marker, University of Illinois at Chicago
Rigid real closed fields
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 - - - -
Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
zoom link: ask Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Schlögl, Technische Universität Wien
Title: Epistemic Modeling of Truly Private Updates and a Glance at
a New Epistemic Model Checking and Visualization Tool
Abstract: Epistemic logic has been successfully applied to the modeling of epistemic and doxastic attitudes of agents in distributed systems. Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) adds communication via model transforming updates. Since agents in distributed systems often exchange information without other agents knowing, however, the commonly known model updates in DEL are generally not adequate for describing fully private communication. In this talk, I will present a novel update mechanism for solving the fully private consistent update synthesis task: designing a model update that makes a given goal formula true while maintaining the consistency of the agents’ beliefs.
In addition, I will provide a first glimpse of the alpha version of a performant epistemic model checking and visualization tool I am currently working on. Model-checking allows us to verify whether a finite-state model (typically represented as a Kripke structure) satisfies a given specification. Many model-checking tools exist for a variety of logical languages, including epistemic logic. To effectively support foundational theoretical research like developing sound and efficient fully private model updates, however, a tool is needed that simultaneously provides:
.) a flexible and intuitive user interface,
.) powerful visualization capabilities for large models (>10,000 states),
.) a performant model-checking algorithm that also provides explanations/proofs/counter-examples
.) easy extendability w.r.t. logical language features and model generation/updates
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 24, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 26, 2024 - - - -
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 29, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Physicalism, intentionality and normativity: The essential explanatory gap
Abstract: In this paper, I present an explanatory gap argument against the view that the semantic facts are fully grounded in the physical facts. Unlike traditional explanatory gap arguments, which stem from the failure of analytic reductive explanation, the explanatory gap I point to stems from the failure of metaphysical explanation. I argue for the following theses. (i) Physicalist grounding claims are metaphysically necessary, if true. (ii) To be explanatorily adequate, these grounding claims must be deducible from facts about essence. (iii) Semantico-physical grounding claims are possibly false, not (only) because they are conceivably false, but because they cannot be deduced from facts about essence. (iv) Semantic properties are essentially weakly normative: it lies in their natures to have correctness conditions and subjectively rationalize—rather than merely cause—behaviour. This gives rise to an explanatory gap that indicates that the semantic facts are not fully grounded in the physical facts.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 30, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, May 1, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, May 2, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, May 3, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, May 3, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Spencer Unger, University of Toronto
Iterated ultrapower methods in analysis of Prikry type forcing
We survey some old and new results in singular cardinal combinatorics whose proofs can be phrased in terms of iterated ultrapowers and ask a few questions.
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday May 3, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Christian Wolf, CUNY
Computability of entropy and pressure on compact symbolic spaces beyond finite type
In this talk we discuss the computability of the entropy and topological pressure on compact shift spaces and continuous potentials . This question has recently been studied for subshifts of finite type (SFTs) and their factors (Sofic shifts). We develop a framework to address the computability of the entropy pressure on general shift spaces and apply this framework to coded shifts. In particular, we prove the computability of the topological pressure for all continuous potentials on S-gap shifts, generalized gap shifts, and Beta shifts. We also construct shift spaces which, depending on the potential, exhibit computability and non-computability of the topological pressure. We further show that the generalized pressure function is not computable for a large set of shift spaces and potentials . Along the way of developing these computability results, we derive several ergodic-theoretical properties of coded shifts which are of independent interest beyond the realm of computability. The topic of the talk is joint work with Michael Burr (Clemson U.), Shuddho Das (Texas Tech) and Yun Yang (Virginia Tech).
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
Wednesday seminar
Set theory and topology seminar 23.04.2024 Tomasz Żuchowski
Tomasz Żuchowski
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
KGRC Talks - April 25
50th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon, but at an irregular time, as we have two speakers this week.
Time(Stevo Todorcevic) :14:30pm, Apr. 19, 2024(Beijing Time)
Time(Dilip Raghavan) :16:00pm, Apr. 19, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 734 242 5443
Passcode :477893
Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=81450804954
_____________________________________________________________________
The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893.
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 15, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 15, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Imaging is Alpha + Aizerman
Abstract: I give a non-probabilistic account of the imaging revision process. Most familiar in its various probabilistic forms, imaging was introduced by David Lewis (1976) as the form of belief revision appropriate for supposing subjunctively that a hypothesis be true. It has played a central role in the semantics of subjunctive conditionals, in causal decision theory, and, less well known to philosophers, in the computational theory of information retrieval. In the economics literature, non-probabilistic imaging functions have been called “pseudo-rationalizable choice functions”. I show that the imaging functions are precisely those which satisfy both Sen’s Alpha Principle (aka “Chernoff’s Axiom”) and the Aizerman Axiom. This result allows us to see very clearly the formal relationship between non-probabilistic imaging and AGM revision (which is Alpha + Beta).
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 16, 2024 - - - -
Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, April 16, Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link: contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Lukas Zenger, University of Bern
Title: Intuitionistic modal logic with the master modality
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 18, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 19, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 19, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Some applications of model theory to lattice-ordered groups
When does a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group embed into a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group with strong unit? After explaining the meaning of this question, I will describe some partial answers obtained via model theory.
- - - - Monday, Apr 22, 2024 - - - -
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 - - - -
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 24, 2024 - - - -
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
- - - - Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 - - - -
*** CUNY SPRING RECESS APRIL 22 - 30 ***
- - - - Friday, Apr 26, 2024 - - - -
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
-------- ADMINISTRIVIA --------
To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, please email your request to jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
If you have a logic-related event that you would like included in future mailings, please email jreitz@citytech.cuny.edu.
KGRC Talks - April 18
Set theory and toplogy seminar 16.04.2024 Krzysztof Zakrzewski (UW)
Krzysztof Zakrzewski (MIM UW)
Wednesday seminar
Two Related Seminars in Geometry and Topology by Shlpak Banerjee and in Logic by Philipp Kunde on Wednesday 17 April 2024
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 8, Hill Center, Hill 705, SPECIAL TIME: 4:00pm
Jing Zhang, Toronto
Squares, ultrafilters and forcing axioms
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 8, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Social construction and meta-ground
Abstract: The notion of social construction plays an important role in many areas of social philosophy, including the philosophy of gender, the philosophy of race, and social ontology. But it is far from clear how this notion (or cluster of notions) is to be understood. One promising proposal, which has been championed in recent years by Aaron Griffith (2017, 2018) and Jonathan Schaffer (2017), is that the notion of constitutive social construction may be analyzed in terms of the notion of metaphysical grounding. In this paper, I argue that a simple ground-theoretic analysis of social construction is subject to two sorts of problem cases and that existing ground-theoretic accounts do not avoid these problems. I then develop a novel ground-theoretic account of social construction in terms of meta-ground, and I argue that it avoids the problems. The core idea of the account is that in cases of social construction, the meta-ground of the relevant grounding fact includes a suitable connective social fact.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 9, 2024 - - - -
MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, April 9, 1pm
Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Representations of lattices
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 10, 2024 - - - -
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Date and Time: Wednesday April 10, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM. IN-PERSON
Title: Pulse Diagrams and Category Theory.
Abstract: ``Pulse diagrams'' are motivated by the ubiquity of pulsation in biology, from action potentials, to heartbeat, to respiration, and at longer time-scales to circadian rhythms and even to human behavior. The syntax of the diagrams is simple, and the semantics are easy to define and simulate with Python code. They express behaviors of parts and wholes as in categorical mereology, but are missing a compositional framework, like string diagrams. Examples to discuss include cellular automata, leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons, harmonic frequency generation, Gillespie algorithm for the chemical master equation, piecewise-linear genetic regulatory networks, Lotka-Volterra systems, and if time permits, aspects of the adaptive immune system. The talk is more about questions than about answers.
- - - - Thursday, Apr 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 12, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 12, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Boban Velickovic University of Paris
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 12, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Geometric tools for the decidability of the existential theory of
I will give a brief survey how tools from algebraic geometry can be used in finding solutions to Diophantine equations over and similar rings. These tools include Artin approximation, arc spaces, motives and resolution of singularities. This approach yields the definability of the existential theory of (in the ring language with a constant for ) contingent upon the validity of resolution of singularities (Denef-Schoutens). Anscombe-Fehm proved a weaker result using model-theoretic tools and together with Dittmann, they gave a proof assuming only the weaker 'local uniformization conjecture.'
- - - - Monday, Apr 15, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 15, 3:30pm Hill Center, Hill 705
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 15, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Imaging is Alpha + Aizerman
Abstract: I give a non-probabilistic account of the imaging revision process. Most familiar in its various probabilistic forms, imaging was introduced by David Lewis (1976) as the form of belief revision appropriate for supposing subjunctively that a hypothesis be true. It has played a central role in the semantics of subjunctive conditionals, in causal decision theory, and, less well known to philosophers, in the computational theory of information retrieval. In the economics literature, non-probabilistic imaging functions have been called “pseudo-rationalizable choice functions”. I show that the imaging functions are precisely those which satisfy both Sen’s Alpha Principle (aka “Chernoff’s Axiom”) and the Aizerman Axiom. This result allows us to see very clearly the formal relationship between non-probabilistic imaging and AGM revision (which is Alpha + Beta).
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 16, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 17, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 18, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 19, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 19, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Some applications of model theory to lattice-ordered groups
When does a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group embed into a hyperarchimedean lattice-ordered group with strong unit? After explaining the meaning of this question, I will describe some partial answers obtained via model theory.
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Logic Seminar Tuesday 9 April 2023 by Piotr Kowalski
KGRC Talk - April 11
Nankai Logic Colloquium paused for two weeks
Set theory and topology seminar 9.04.2024 Jakub Rondos
Jakub Rondos (University of Vienna)
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
Cross-Alps Logic Seminar (speaker: Luca Motto Ros)
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics
Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -
MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, April 2, 1pm
Athar Abdul-Quader, Purchase College
Representations of lattices
Following up on the series of talks on the history of the problem, in this talk we will discuss the main technique for realizing finite lattices as interstructure lattices, due to Schmerl in 1986. We will motivate this technique by studying an example: the Boolean algebra . We will see how we can modify the technique to produce elementary extensions realizing specific ranked lattices to ensure that such extensions are end, cofinal, or mixed extensions.
Spring 2024 (online)
Abstract: In this presentation I focus on a framework that generalizes dynamic epistemic logic in order to model a wider range of scenarios including those in which agents read or communicate (or somehow gain access to) all the information stored at specific sources, or possessed by some other agents (including information of a non-propositional nature, such as data, passwords, secrets etc). The resulting framework allows one to reason about the state of affairs in which one agent (or group of agents) has ‘epistemic superiority’ over another agent (or group). I will present different examples of epistemic superiority and I will draw a connection to the logic of functional dependence by A. Baltag and J. van Benthem. At the level of group attitudes, I will further introduce the new concept of 'common distributed knowledge', which combines features of both common knowledge and distributed knowledge. This presentation is based on joint work with A. Baltag in [1].
[1] A. Baltag and S. Smets, Learning what others know, in L. Kovacs and E. Albert (eds.), LPAR23 proceedings of the International Conference on Logic for Programming, AI and Reasoning, EPiC Series in Computing, 73:90-110, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29007/plm4
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -
April 5, Friday, 10 AM
Zoom meeting, please contact Rohit Parikh for zoom link
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations
In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.
Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.
- - - - Monday, Apr 8, 2024 - - - -
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Apr 8, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Jing Zhang
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 8, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Social construction and meta-ground
Abstract: The notion of social construction plays an important role in many areas of social philosophy, including the philosophy of gender, the philosophy of race, and social ontology. But it is far from clear how this notion (or cluster of notions) is to be understood. One promising proposal, which has been championed in recent years by Aaron Griffith (2017, 2018) and Jonathan Schaffer (2017), is that the notion of constitutive social construction may be analyzed in terms of the notion of metaphysical grounding. In this paper, I argue that a simple ground-theoretic analysis of social construction is subject to two sorts of problem cases and that existing ground-theoretic accounts do not avoid these problems. I then develop a novel ground-theoretic account of social construction in terms of meta-ground, and I argue that it avoids the problems. The core idea of the account is that in cases of social construction, the meta-ground of the relevant grounding fact includes a suitable connective social fact.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 9, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 10, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 11, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 12, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 12, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Boban Velickovic University of Paris
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 12, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Hans Schoutens, CUNY
Geometric tools for the decidability of the existential theory of
I will give a brief survey how tools from algebraic geometry can be used in finding solutions to Diophantine equations over and similar rings. These tools include Artin approximation, arc spaces, motives and resolution of singularities. This approach yields the definability of the existential theory of (in the ring language with a constant for ) contingent upon the validity of resolution of singularities (Denef-Schoutens). Anscombe-Fehm proved a weaker result using model-theoretic tools and together with Dittmann, they gave a proof assuming only the weaker 'local uniformization conjecture.'
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
Wednesday seminar
49th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.
This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Title :The 49th Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos
Time :16:00pm, Mar. 29, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 734 242 5443
Passcode :477893
The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893.
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
Logic Seminar Talks 27 March 2024 and 3 April 2024 at NUS
UPDATE: This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Mar 25, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Date: Monday, March 25, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: A moderate theory of overall resemblance
Abstract: This paper defends the moderate theory of overall resemblance stated by: A) y is at least as similar to x as z is iff: i) every resemblance property shared by x and z is also shared by x and y, and ii) for any resemblance family of properties F, y is at least as similar to x as z is with respect to F. In this account, a resemblance property is a property that corresponds to a genuine respect in which two things can resemble each other, whereas a resemblance family is a set of properties with respect to which things can be more or less similar to each other. An example of a resemblance property is being cubical, an example of a non-resemblance property is being either a gold cube or a silver sphere, and an example of a resemblance family is the set of specific mass properties.
- - - - Tuesday, Mar 26, 2024 - - - -
MOPA (Models of Peano Arithmetic)
CUNY Graduate Center
Virtual (email Victoria Gitman for meeting id)
Tuesday, March 26, 1pm
Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of PA: Part ii
The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N. I will talk about the history of the problem, from the seminal paper of Haim Gaifman from 1976 and other early results to some recent work of Jim Schmerl. There is much to talk about.
Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, March 26 Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link: contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Studer, University of Bern
Title: Simplicial Complexes for Epistemic Logic
- - - - Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Mar 28, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Mar 29, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, Apr 1, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics
Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations
In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.
Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
Set theory and topology seminar 26.03.2024 Tomasz Żuchowski
Tomasz Żuchowski
(on behalf of the organizers, i.e. Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja, Paweł Krupski, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Grzegorz Plebanek, Robert Rałowski and myself)
About 15 minutes before the seminar we invite you for coffee and a chat to social room A.4.1.A in C-19.
https://settheory.pwr.edu.pl/
http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/seminarium/topologia
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Rutgers Logic Seminar
Monday Mar 25, 3:30pm, Hill Center, Hill 705
Date: Monday, March 25, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: A moderate theory of overall resemblance
Abstract: This paper defends the moderate theory of overall resemblance stated by: A) y is at least as similar to x as z is iff: i) every resemblance property shared by x and z is also shared by x and y, and ii) for any resemblance family of properties F, y is at least as similar to x as z is with respect to F. In this account, a resemblance property is a property that corresponds to a genuine respect in which two things can resemble each other, whereas a resemblance family is a set of properties with respect to which things can be more or less similar to each other. An example of a resemblance property is being cubical, an example of a non-resemblance property is being either a gold cube or a silver sphere, and an example of a resemblance family is the set of specific mass properties.
- - - - Tuesday, Mar 26, 2024 - - - -
Computational Logic Seminar
Spring 2024 (online)
Tuesday, March 26 Time 2:00 - 4:00 PM
zoom link: contact Sergei Artemov (sartemov@gmail.com)
Speaker: Thomas Studer, University of Bern
Title: Simplicial Complexes for Epistemic Logic
- - - - Wednesday, Mar 27, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Mar 28, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Mar 29, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Monday, Apr 1, 2024 - - - -
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, April 1, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Andrew Tedder (Vienna).
Title: Relevant logics as topical logics
Abstract: There is a simple way of reading a structure of topics into the matrix models of a given logic, namely by taking the topics of a given matrix model to be represented by subalgebras of the algebra reduct of the matrix, and then considering assignments of subalgebras to formulas. The resulting topic-enriched matrix models bear suggestive similarities to the two-component frame models developed by Berto et. al. in Topics of Thought. In this talk I’ll show how this reading of topics can be applied to the relevant logic R, and its algebraic characterisation in terms of De Morgan monoids, and indicate how we can, using this machinery and the fact that R satisfies the variable sharing property, read R as a topic-sensitive logic. I’ll then suggest how this approach to modeling topics can be applied to a broader range of logics/classes of matrices, and gesture at some avenues of research.
- - - - Tuesday, Apr 2, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Wednesday, Apr 3, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Thursday, Apr 4, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Apr 5, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, April 5, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Kameryn Williams Bard College at Simon's Rock
Logic Workshop
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday April 5, 2:00pm-3:30pm, Room 5417
Decision problem for groups as equivalence relations
In 1911, Dehn proposed three decision problems for finitely presented groups: the word problem, the conjugacy problem, and the isomorphism problem. These problems have been central to both group theory and logic, and were each proven to be undecidable in the 50's. There is much current research studying the decidability of these problems in certain classes of groups.
Classically, when a decision problem is undecidable, its complexity is measured using Turing reducibility. However, Dehn's problems can also be naturally thought of as computably enumerable equivalence relations (ceers). We take this point of view and measure their complexity using computable reductions. This yields behaviors different from the classical context: for instance, every Turing degree contains a word problem, but not every ceer degree does. This leads us to study the structure of ceer degrees containing a word problem and other related questions.
Speakers:
Paul Baginski (Fairfield)
Artem Chernikov (Maryland)
Alf Dolich (CUNY)
Alexei Kolesnikov (Towson)
NEMTD 2024 sponsored by the Mid-Atlantic Mathematical Logic Seminar (NSF grant #DMS-1834219) and the Wesleyan Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
Organizers: Alex Kruckman, Rehana Patel, Alex Van Abel. Contact akruckman@wesleyan.edu with any questions.
Find us on the web at: nylogic.github.io
(site designed, built & maintained by Victoria Gitman)
Wednesday seminar
48th Nankai Logic Colloquium
Hello everyone,
This week our weekly Nankai Logic Colloquium is going to be in the afternoon.
This is going to be an online event. Follow the link below to join the Zoom meeting. Please use your real name to join the meeting.
Title :The 48th Nankai Logic Colloquium -- Dominique LecomteTime :16:00pm, Mar. 22, 2024(Beijing Time)
Zoom Number : 734 242 5443
Passcode :477893
Link :https://zoom.us/j/7342425443?pwd=NnO2EFts9VOfCR9eDFUkoI3lNn2QTo.1&omn=87996387829
_____________________________________________________________________
The records of past talks can be accessed at https://space.bilibili.com/253421893.
Best wishes,
Ming Xiao
Logic Seminar 20 March 2024 17:00 hrs by Sun Mengzhou
This Week in Logic at CUNY
Logic and Metaphysics Workshop
Date: Monday, March 18, 4.15-6.15pm (NY time)
Room: Graduate Center Room 7395
Title: Modal quantifiers, potential infinity, and Yablo sequences
Abstract: When properly arithmetized, Yablo’s paradox results in a set of formulas which (with local disquotation in the background) turns out to be consistent, but omega-inconsistent. Adding either uniform disquotation or the omega-rule results in inconsistency. Since the paradox involves an infinite sequence of sentences, one might think that it doesn’t arise in finitary contexts. We study whether it does. It turns out that the issue depends on how the finitistic approach is formalized. On one of them, proposed by Marcin Mostowski, all the paradoxical sentences simply fail to hold. This happens at a price: the underlying finitistic arithmetic itself is omega-inconsistent. Finally, when studied in the context of a finitistic approach which preserves the truth of standard arithmetic, the paradox strikes back — it does so with double force, for now the inconsistency can be obtained without the use of uniform disquotation or the omega-rule.
Note: This is joint work with Rafał Urbaniak (Gdańsk).
- - - - Tuesday, Mar 19, 2024 - - - -
Roman Kossak, CUNY
The lattice problem for models of PA
The lattice problem for models of PA is to determine which lattices can be represented either as lattices of elementary substructures of a model of PA or, more generally, which can be represented as lattices of elementary substructures of a model N that contain a given elementary substructure M of N. I will talk about the history of the problem, from the seminal paper of Haim Gaifman from 1976 and other early results to some recent work of Jim Schmerl. There is much to talk about.
Spring 2024 (online)
Title: Logics of Intuitionistic Knowledge and Verification
The New York City Category Theory Seminar
Department of Computer Science
Department of Mathematics
The Graduate Center of The City University of New York
URL: http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~noson/Seminar/index.html
Speaker: Sina Hazratpour, Johns Hopkins University.
Date and Time: Wednesday March 20, 2024, 7:00 - 8:30 PM.
Title: Fibred Categories in Lean.
Abstract: Fibred categories are one of the most important and useful concepts in category theory and its application in categorical logic. In this talk I present my recent formalization of fibred categories in the interactive theorem prover Lean 4. I begin by highlighting certain technical challenges associated with handling the equality of objects and functors within the extensional dependent type system of Lean, and how they can be overcome. In this direction, I will demonstrate how we can take advantage of dependent coercion, instance synthesis, and automation tactics from the Lean toolbox. Finally I will discuss a formalization of Homotopy Type Theory in Lean 4 using a fired categorical framework.
- - - - Thursday, Mar 21, 2024 - - - -
- - - - Friday, Mar 22, 2024 - - - -
CUNY Graduate Center
Friday, March 22, 12:30pm NY time
Virtual: Please email Victoria Gitman (vgitman@gmail.com) for meeting id.
Arthur Apter, CUNY
A choiceless answer to a question of Woodin
In a lecture presented in July 2023, Moti Gitik discussed the following question from the 1980s due to Woodin, as well as approaches to its solution and why it is so difficult to solve:
Question: Assuming there is no inner model of ZFC with a strong cardinal, is it possible to have a model of ZFC such that ' and for every ', together with the existence of an inner model of ZFC such that for the so that and